<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nissan GT-R refreshed for 2011 model year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-315246</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-315246</guid>
		<description>Well, I can go to Bugatti Veyron&#039;s Wikipedia page and change its horsepower to 1000bhp to 2000bhp, no problem. So what do you think? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can go to Bugatti Veyron&#039;s Wikipedia page and change its horsepower to 1000bhp to 2000bhp, no problem. So what do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leagm</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-315144</link>
		<dc:creator>leagm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-315144</guid>
		<description>ok i want this gtr </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok i want this gtr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icyd</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-272034</link>
		<dc:creator>icyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-272034</guid>
		<description>driving a supercomputer </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>driving a supercomputer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazda 3 MPS</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268987</link>
		<dc:creator>Mazda 3 MPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268987</guid>
		<description>next wait for mazda rx-7 to bite u all guys </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>next wait for mazda rx-7 to bite u all guys</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torque</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268354</link>
		<dc:creator>torque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268354</guid>
		<description>Victor said, 
October 22, 2009 @ 9:32 pm  
 
Oh yea, why not Nissan make a TRANSMISSION upgrade for this beast? Since the transmission has issues with the LC (Launch Control).. Not forgetting after the usage of LC and disabling the VDC, it will void the warranty. OUCH !! 
 
_________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Victor, I read somewhere that the new Nissan GTR model (I think it&#039;s 2010 upwards la) will not be equip with any LC anymore due to what u just said...transmission issue!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Victor said,</p>
<p>October 22, 2009 @ 9:32 pm </p>
<p>Oh yea, why not Nissan make a TRANSMISSION upgrade for this beast? Since the transmission has issues with the LC (Launch Control).. Not forgetting after the usage of LC and disabling the VDC, it will void the warranty. OUCH !!</p>
<p>_________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Victor, I read somewhere that the new Nissan GTR model (I think it&#039;s 2010 upwards la) will not be equip with any LC anymore due to what u just said&#8230;transmission issue!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hani mechy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268345</link>
		<dc:creator>hani mechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268345</guid>
		<description>Drag coefficient (Cd) of 0.27 doesn&#039;t mean it experience drag force lower than for example porche with Cd of 0.3. Drag force is measured by effective front area times the drag coefficient times the speed. Let&#039;s say Porsche front area is 200mm2 and GTR boxy front area is 400mm2. The Porsche will experience 60N/mm2 of drag compared to 108N/mm2 on GTR in same speed. Drag coefficient mean nothing just the measure of effectiveness in one single design. Yup that boxy design is effective. But there&#039;s still room for improvement by reducing the boxyness thus reducing front area. To all readers out there this piece of information is important for you. Cd are just used for advertisement purposes. Get more information before you embarass yourself. Hey Paul, maybe you should start posting some lessons to educate us the readers. Not just updates on motoring industry. Regards </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drag coefficient (Cd) of 0.27 doesn&#039;t mean it experience drag force lower than for example porche with Cd of 0.3. Drag force is measured by effective front area times the drag coefficient times the speed. Let&#039;s say Porsche front area is 200mm2 and GTR boxy front area is 400mm2. The Porsche will experience 60N/mm2 of drag compared to 108N/mm2 on GTR in same speed. Drag coefficient mean nothing just the measure of effectiveness in one single design. Yup that boxy design is effective. But there&#039;s still room for improvement by reducing the boxyness thus reducing front area. To all readers out there this piece of information is important for you. Cd are just used for advertisement purposes. Get more information before you embarass yourself. Hey Paul, maybe you should start posting some lessons to educate us the readers. Not just updates on motoring industry. Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268197</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268197</guid>
		<description>Comparing V10 to a V6?? hahahaha.... 
 
i wonder if Nissan developed a V10 engine, how much horse will be produced then??  
 
Oh yea, why not Nissan make a TRANSMISSION upgrade for this beast? Since the transmission has issues with the LC (Launch Control).. Not forgetting after the usage of LC and disabling the VDC, it will void the warranty. OUCH !! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing V10 to a V6?? hahahaha&#8230;.</p>
<p>i wonder if Nissan developed a V10 engine, how much horse will be produced then?? </p>
<p>Oh yea, why not Nissan make a TRANSMISSION upgrade for this beast? Since the transmission has issues with the LC (Launch Control).. Not forgetting after the usage of LC and disabling the VDC, it will void the warranty. OUCH !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: God[of]War</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268171</link>
		<dc:creator>God[of]War</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268171</guid>
		<description>tim said, 
October 21, 2009 @ 10:34 pm  
 
*quote* 
 
Mohd said, 
October 21, 2009 @ 6:49 pm 
 
&#8220;Japanese sports car maker Nissan&#8221; 
 
What ? Nissan is neither a sportscar maker  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March)&lt;/a&gt; nor a japanese company any more  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault)..&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault)..&lt;/a&gt;.  
 
Quote from the second link: &#8216;The Renault-Nissan Alliance is much closer, in practice to Renault takeover of Nissan with Renault holding 44.3% of Nissan shares, while Nissan holds 15% of Renault shares which does not give Nissan a voting or board representation due to legal restriction in France.&#8217; 
 
___________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Proton owns Lotus, so this doesn&#8217;t make Lotus a British company anymore? Pfft.. 
 
Oh yea, and Wikipedia blows, fyi =) 
 
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
Oh yea, and Wikipedia blows, fyi =) (Is it true? any evidence?) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tim said,</p>
<p>October 21, 2009 @ 10:34 pm </p>
<p>*quote*</p>
<p>Mohd said,</p>
<p>October 21, 2009 @ 6:49 pm</p>
<p>&ldquo;Japanese sports car maker Nissan&rdquo;</p>
<p>What ? Nissan is neither a sportscar maker  <a href="http://(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March)" rel="nofollow">(</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March</a>) nor a japanese company any more  <a href="http://(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault).." rel="nofollow">(</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault</a>)... </p>
<p>Quote from the second link: &lsquo;The Renault-Nissan Alliance is much closer, in practice to Renault takeover of Nissan with Renault holding 44.3% of Nissan shares, while Nissan holds 15% of Renault shares which does not give Nissan a voting or board representation due to legal restriction in France.&rsquo;</p>
<p>___________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Proton owns Lotus, so this doesn&rsquo;t make Lotus a British company anymore? Pfft..</p>
<p>Oh yea, and Wikipedia blows, fyi =)</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Oh yea, and Wikipedia blows, fyi =) (Is it true? any evidence?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azrai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268136</link>
		<dc:creator>azrai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268136</guid>
		<description>One word only. geramnya tengok GTR ni. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One word only. geramnya tengok GTR ni.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nizam80</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268114</link>
		<dc:creator>nizam80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268114</guid>
		<description>Yes, the Lexus LFA can beat this car on a track. But, against the GTR Spec V, it will be a close fight! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the Lexus LFA can beat this car on a track. But, against the GTR Spec V, it will be a close fight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torque</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268093</link>
		<dc:creator>torque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268093</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...the desirable just gets more desirable...agreed with what LP560-4 juz said on the GTR 34 exterior looks which kinda reminiscent like a muscle car to me, not only that...just make a stick shift version la Nissan!! A GTR with no stick shift version feels like...hmmm...missing something... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;the desirable just gets more desirable&#8230;agreed with what LP560-4 juz said on the GTR 34 exterior looks which kinda reminiscent like a muscle car to me, not only that&#8230;just make a stick shift version la Nissan!! A GTR with no stick shift version feels like&#8230;hmmm&#8230;missing something&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gajen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268069</link>
		<dc:creator>Gajen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268069</guid>
		<description>i prefer LFA anytime </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i prefer LFA anytime</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wochomi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268056</link>
		<dc:creator>wochomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268056</guid>
		<description>Dashboard looks like a WWII bomber, you know the black n white theme. But then again, it reminds you that you&#039;re driving a mean machine and pretty-pretty boy toycar. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dashboard looks like a WWII bomber, you know the black n white theme. But then again, it reminds you that you&#039;re driving a mean machine and pretty-pretty boy toycar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP560-4</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268054</link>
		<dc:creator>LP560-4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268054</guid>
		<description>The same exterior? 
Come on Nissan... I know you can do better! 
Until now, I still prefer R34 exterior compared to R35. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same exterior?</p>
<p>Come on Nissan&#8230; I know you can do better!</p>
<p>Until now, I still prefer R34 exterior compared to R35.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maserati</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268015</link>
		<dc:creator>Maserati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268015</guid>
		<description>I love this car so much,but somehow I feel that the Lexus LF-A will pawn this car... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this car so much,but somehow I feel that the Lexus LF-A will pawn this car&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohd</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268014</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268014</guid>
		<description>tim said, 
 October 21, 2009 @ 10:34 pm 
 
&quot;Proton owns Lotus, so this doesn&#8217;t make Lotus a British company anymore? Pfft.. 
Oh yea, and Wikipedia blows, fyi =)&quot; 
 
So the Nissan Micra/March is a &#039;sports car&#039; for you ? Very interesting... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tim said,</p>
<p> October 21, 2009 @ 10:34 pm</p>
<p>&quot;Proton owns Lotus, so this doesn&rsquo;t make Lotus a British company anymore? Pfft..</p>
<p>Oh yea, and Wikipedia blows, fyi =)&quot;</p>
<p>So the Nissan Micra/March is a &#039;sports car&#039; for you ? Very interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyan46</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-268006</link>
		<dc:creator>nyan46</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-268006</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a car or iphone 3gs </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#039;s a car or iphone 3gs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267975</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267975</guid>
		<description>*quote* 
 
Mohd said, 
October 21, 2009 @ 6:49 pm 
 
&#8220;Japanese sports car maker Nissan&#8221; 
 
What ? Nissan is neither a sportscar maker  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March)&lt;/a&gt; nor a japanese company any more  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault)..&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault)..&lt;/a&gt;.  
 
Quote from the second link: &#8216;The Renault-Nissan Alliance is much closer, in practice to Renault takeover of Nissan with Renault holding 44.3% of Nissan shares, while Nissan holds 15% of Renault shares which does not give Nissan a voting or board representation due to legal restriction in France.&#8217; 
 
___________________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
Proton owns Lotus, so this doesn&#039;t make Lotus a British company anymore? Pfft.. 
 
Oh yea, and Wikipedia blows, fyi =) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*quote*</p>
<p>Mohd said,</p>
<p>October 21, 2009 @ 6:49 pm</p>
<p>&ldquo;Japanese sports car maker Nissan&rdquo;</p>
<p>What ? Nissan is neither a sportscar maker  <a href="http://(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March)" rel="nofollow">(</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March</a>) nor a japanese company any more  <a href="http://(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault).." rel="nofollow">(</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault</a>)... </p>
<p>Quote from the second link: &lsquo;The Renault-Nissan Alliance is much closer, in practice to Renault takeover of Nissan with Renault holding 44.3% of Nissan shares, while Nissan holds 15% of Renault shares which does not give Nissan a voting or board representation due to legal restriction in France.&rsquo;</p>
<p>___________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Proton owns Lotus, so this doesn&#039;t make Lotus a British company anymore? Pfft..</p>
<p>Oh yea, and Wikipedia blows, fyi =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lmst</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267964</link>
		<dc:creator>lmst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267964</guid>
		<description>wow..too much meter...like airoplane </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow..too much meter&#8230;like airoplane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jolly_idiot</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267930</link>
		<dc:creator>jolly_idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267930</guid>
		<description>Nissan answer to Toyota </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nissan answer to Toyota</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RunnerUp</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267913</link>
		<dc:creator>RunnerUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267913</guid>
		<description>Ralph, don&#039;t start. Hehehe. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph, don&#039;t start. Hehehe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stig</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267912</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267912</guid>
		<description>isn&#039;t this supposed to be the Spec-M? a silver GT-R was caught tested around the Nurbugring which came camouflaged on the front bumper and on the rear side skirts a few weeks ago. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#039;t this supposed to be the Spec-M? a silver GT-R was caught tested around the Nurbugring which came camouflaged on the front bumper and on the rear side skirts a few weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mu_77</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267911</link>
		<dc:creator>mu_77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267911</guid>
		<description>Amazing, super and fantastic car!!! Dono what else to describe about it.......... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing, super and fantastic car!!! Dono what else to describe about it&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohd</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267909</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267909</guid>
		<description>&quot;Japanese sports car maker Nissan&quot; 
 
What ? Nissan is neither a sportscar maker  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March)&lt;/a&gt; nor a japanese company any more  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault)..&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault)..&lt;/a&gt;. ;) 
 
Quote from the second link: &#039;The Renault-Nissan Alliance is much closer, in practice to Renault takeover of Nissan with Renault holding 44.3% of Nissan shares, while Nissan holds 15% of Renault shares which does not give Nissan a voting or board representation due to legal restriction in France.&#039; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Japanese sports car maker Nissan&quot;</p>
<p>What ? Nissan is neither a sportscar maker  <a href="http://(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March)" rel="nofollow">(</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_March</a>) nor a japanese company any more  <a href="http://(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault).." rel="nofollow">(</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan#Alliance_with_Renault</a>)... <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Quote from the second link: &#039;The Renault-Nissan Alliance is much closer, in practice to Renault takeover of Nissan with Renault holding 44.3% of Nissan shares, while Nissan holds 15% of Renault shares which does not give Nissan a voting or board representation due to legal restriction in France.&#039;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unknown</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267906</link>
		<dc:creator>unknown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267906</guid>
		<description>why no bigger horsepower. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why no bigger horsepower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267894</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267894</guid>
		<description>They seems like making car to run at Wangan? 
I saw at its LCD panel reads &quot;Shuto Kousukou&quot; and other Japanese highway names, and all those dials that Wangan runners usually used. 
They really done their homework, unlike some &quot;local&quot; company who facelifted their car but performance still the same. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They seems like making car to run at Wangan?</p>
<p>I saw at its LCD panel reads &quot;Shuto Kousukou&quot; and other Japanese highway names, and all those dials that Wangan runners usually used.</p>
<p>They really done their homework, unlike some &quot;local&quot; company who facelifted their car but performance still the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr_3m</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267891</link>
		<dc:creator>mr_3m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267891</guid>
		<description>2011 model year already launched now in Oct 2009? Or is it 2010MY? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2011 model year already launched now in Oct 2009? Or is it 2010MY?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seperlinky</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267890</link>
		<dc:creator>seperlinky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267890</guid>
		<description>it should not change any exterior because it has intensive wind tunnel work has resulted in one of the best drag coefficients in the sector &#8211; just 0.27 &#8211; which is all the more impressive on a supercar that generates high downforce front and rear. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it should not change any exterior because it has intensive wind tunnel work has resulted in one of the best drag coefficients in the sector &ndash; just 0.27 &ndash; which is all the more impressive on a supercar that generates high downforce front and rear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267886</link>
		<dc:creator>shan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267886</guid>
		<description>toyota coming to bite ur back.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>toyota coming to bite ur back&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazda 3 MPS</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/21/nissan-gt-r-refreshed-for-2011-model-year/#comment-267880</link>
		<dc:creator>Mazda 3 MPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16727#comment-267880</guid>
		<description>i like this a lot more than that ridiculous lexus </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like this a lot more than that ridiculous lexus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

