Nissan to reject Renault integration proposal – no to merger, yes to equal capital relationship – report

Nissan to reject Renault integration proposal – no to merger, yes to equal capital relationship – report

According to reports, Nissan is set to reject a management integration proposal from alliance partner and major shareholder Renault. The Japanese carmaker will also call for an equal capital relationship to replace the current lopsided one.

According to Japan’s Nikkei, citing sources, Nissan’s management feels the company has not been treated as an equal of Renault under existing capital ties, and a merger would make this inequality permanent.

This has previously been cited as the contentious issue that got former Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance chief Carlos Ghosn into the trouble he’s in now. Facing charges in Japan, Ghosn insists that he’s a victim of a boardroom coup and “backstabbing” by Nissan executives opposed to closer ties with Renault.

Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa declined to comment. “Now is not the time to think of such things. At the moment we are focused on improving Nissan’s earnings performance. Please give us time to do that,” he said. Renault has also declined to comment on the Nikkei report.

It’s easy to see why there’s tension between Nissan and Renault despite both carmakers profiting from the marriage. The alliance started when Renault saved Nissan from the brink of bankruptcy in 1999, by buying a 36.8% stake in the Japanese company. Later, this was bumped up to 44.4%, and Nissan reciprocated by buying 15% of Renault shares. Renault, which counts the French government as a major shareholder, sits on the Nissan board. Nissan’s 15% stake in Renault is without voting rights.

The shareholding is not very equal, and that’s before taking into account that Nissan is now the larger and more profitable carmaker than Renault. If this were a human relationship, Renault swooped in and provided support at a moment of weakness from Nissan, and has profited handsomely from its spouse’s success since then.

It wants more. According to Nikkei, Renault has argued in its proposal that an integration would maximise synergies within the alliance. The Financial Times reported last month of Renault’s intention to restart merger talks with Nissan within 12 months. So, besides the Ghosn case playing out in court, expect a Franco-Japanese corporate wrestling match happening concurrently.

What will Nissan do to get its way? Why would Renault (and France) give up its upper hand? It’ll be interesting to watch. Meanwhile, hear what the man in the middle of the war – Carlos Ghosn – has to say in the video above.

Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.

Certified Pre-Owned - 1 Year Warranty

10% discount when you renew your car insurance

Compare prices between different insurer providers and use the promo code 'PAULTAN10' when you make your payment to save the most on your car insurance renewal compared to other competing services.

Car Insurance

Danny Tan

Danny Tan loves driving as much as he loves a certain herbal meat soup, and sweet engine music as much as drum beats. He has been in the auto industry since 2006, previously filling the pages of two motoring magazines before joining this website. Enjoys detailing the experience more than the technical details.

 

Comments

  • panjang on Apr 24, 2019 at 5:37 pm

    Ever wonder why Ghosn is not yet found guilty?
    Its not because the case is complicated, it never is a complicated case like our 1MDB.
    I believe its because there is no case at all.

    Ghosn might becomes even richer when this ends.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
  • Clearly Nissan has not yet realised who owns the majority of their shares. Those Japs are still oblivious, thinking they are still superior in the world. Well, reality is about to hit them hard.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
  • Aura89 on Apr 24, 2019 at 6:12 pm

    15% vs 44.4%, mana ada equal wei! Do the Nissan Japanese bosses know how to count?

    Instead of crying like a baby, why didn’t they increase their ownership of Renault shares to 44.4% and then go about demanding for equal relationship.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2
  • seancorr (Member) on Apr 24, 2019 at 10:57 pm

    All I have to say is….without Renault helping back then Nissan would be dead now. Even if Renault profits more now it’s not like Nissan is not getting anything out of it. Really ungrateful bunch of twats.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
  • tiadaid (Member) on Apr 25, 2019 at 8:01 am

    In my experience with the Japanese, they have an arrogance about them that they think foreigners aren’t good. But in the case of Nissan, it’s clear that without those foreigners (and to think, it’s the French that saved their behinds!), they wouldn’t have survived.

    Explains why Japanese companies are on the backburner while Chinese companies are climbing up the ladder. Just take a look at Sony.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2
    • Brian on Apr 25, 2019 at 7:42 pm

      They don’t seem to worry. They still have blinded fanboys that talk shiet about other brands while trumping their own shiets.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  • Semi-Value (Member) on Apr 25, 2019 at 9:21 am

    cos nissan doesnt want their cars to be unreliable

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
  • Anonymous_C on Apr 25, 2019 at 11:52 am

    goodbye Mitsubishi heritage Pajero, Lancer and Evolutions

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  • That’s what happens when one has forgotten how they were saved from annihilation and now turned around to bite their savior’s hands. FYI, I was just talking Nissan here yeah.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
    • Rakyat Malaysia on Apr 26, 2019 at 12:31 am

      Rakyat power to change and lead Malaysia to a better future. Corruption crackdown scored an overwhelming victory for rakyat. Nissan and Rakyat Malaysia in pretty similar position. Power now back in rakyat hands!

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
 

Add a comment

required

required