The J.D. Power Asia Pacific 2009 Malaysia Sales Satisfaction Index Study results have been released today, its 7th installment so far.
It tracks sales and delivery experience of most car brands in Malaysia and takes into account 7 key factors over a 1,000 point scale – delivery process; delivery timing; paperwork; dealer facility; salesperson; deal and sales initiation.
Publisher: J.D. Power Asia Pacific Source: J.D. Power Asia Pacific 2009 Malaysia Sales Satisfaction Index (SSI) Study
The average SSI score is 3 points higher this year compared to last year. Car manufacturers may be putting extra effort to ensure their customers are satisfied, especially during these times of a lower Total Industry Volume.
The biggest increase in satisfaction is in the area of delivery timing. The “national” brands (Proton, Perodua, Naza and Inokom) have improved by an average of 6 points, however they still trail the non-national brand average by 16 points. This gap is closer compared to 2008 though, where it was a 29 point difference.
Look after the jump for the full JD Power report.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
Paul, you said this is the 7th installment. Can I know where are the earlier installments. I think I missed them on your blog. :-)
paul, typo? 16 and 16?
"however they still trail the non-national brand average by 16 points. This gap is closer compared to 2008 though, where it was a 16 point difference."
wtf….p2 is higher than p1…ni rasuah ni…hehehe…just kidding…
So sorry, fixed.
Lee Callan: My blog is younger than 7 years old ;)
three top selling national brands find themselves rated below average.
how ironic and sad is that.
I'm wondering where are the p1/p2 bashers.
how bout conti brands?
For me I had better experience in P1 showroom than P2. That should account for "salesperson; deal and sales initiation" part.
agreed. P2 salesperson more arrogant. the same goes to Dugong Car sales person. Maybe can highlight is smartwheels.
Quick question: Is the graph linear?
to me the survey not mean anything because our level of education.
The survey also should to include education level as benchmark due
because I believe for renowned brand like toyota and honda have the high educated person compare to local manufacturing…and of course their thinking so different…
That way when people who qualifications just PMR and SPM can't give accurate data when survey did and one more either emotional took as tool for decision or intelectual side …That IS……
KitKat said,
August 28, 2009 @ 9:32 pm
I’m wondering where are the p1/p2 bashers.
………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Now is Ramadhan, cannot bash others.kurang pahala.
Should bash Naza lah!
Stuck-up AP king!
Naza has good service…if you buy a Ferrari :P and not their Naza Brand
hehe… This is humourous! The Msian Brands Proton, Naza and Perodua are ALL below average.
You mean you are actually surprised ???
What u pay is what u get, =D
those top 6 car maker just make small volume sales,of course they can entertain customer which paid extra vanganza RM for their car :) it is a surprise if those 6 car makers below average
ps: merdeka!
Hahaha..P2 is under average?
sell less have less complaint? Total respondents to this test were unknown. Not realistic statistic.
Hi,
There's a new poll by new Honda Civic owner – which shows almost 78% of Honda customer were unhappy with the Honda Service Center.
You can read the post and the view poll result (still ongoing – for Honda Civic owner, you can register in the forum and vote in your satisfaction level)
I myself wonder, how Honda can get no.4 spot with the level of service quality given by their SC.
quote 1 of the user : If you discover or prove the problem area, SC automated answer is : Its normal. All honda car like this. You have to bear with it.
Hopefully Paul Tan can give some coverage to this issue. Honda Malaysia hardly listen to their customers.
Malaysian car Seller need Big Time Surgery>>> Spoofed>> The Engine Sold in Malaysia are 4 years backward, How come>> Malaysia Boleh??? Hahahaha