Jaguar F-Pace vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Verdict
The F-Pace is RM50,000 cheaper at RM448,800 yet has 300 hp and 400 Nm, so it is much quicker: 0-100 km/h takes 6.0 seconds versus 8.6 in the Evoque. It is also longer, taller and has a 193 mm longer wheelbase, useful for presence and cabin packaging. The Evoque fights back with a bigger 591-litre boot, a 67-litre tank and standard AEB. Both are CBU petrol AWD SUVs with six airbags and RM439 annual road tax.
Pick the Jaguar F-Pace if you want the stronger, quicker SUV and do not need the biggest boot in this pair.
Pick the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if boot space and standard auto emergency braking matter more than acceleration.
Key differences
- Price: Jaguar F-Pace RM448,800; Range Rover Evoque RM498,800
- Power and torque: F-Pace 300 hp/400 Nm; Evoque 200 hp/320 Nm
- 0-100 km/h: F-Pace 6.0 s; Evoque 8.6 s
- Size: F-Pace 4,731 mm long/2,874 mm wheelbase; Evoque 4,371 mm long/2,681 mm wheelbase
- Boot space: F-Pace 508 L; Evoque 591 L
- Safety assist: F-Pace AEB not listed; Evoque AEB standard
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM 448,800✓ | RM 498,800 |
| Body type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | Compact Executive | Compact Executive |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Assembly | CBU | CBU |
| Powertrain | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| Power | 300 hp✓ | 200 hp |
| Torque | 400 Nm✓ | 320 Nm |
| Transmission | Conventional Automatic | Conventional Automatic |
| Driven wheels | All Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 6.0 s✓ | 8.6 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h✓ | 216 km/h |
| Efficiency | ||
| Fuel economy | 7.7 L/100km | — |
| EV range | 0 km | — |
| CO₂ | 170 g/km | — |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,731 mm | 4,371 mm |
| Width | 1,936 mm | 1,996 mm |
| Height | 1,667 mm | 1,649 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,874 mm | 2,681 mm |
| Boot space | 508 L | 591 L✓ |
| Fuel tank | 63 L | 67 L |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 6 | 6 |
| Auto emergency braking | — | Yes |
| Ownership | ||
| Warranty | 5 | 5 |
| Road tax / year | RM 439 | RM 439 |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
F-Pace
- RM50,000 lower price
- Much stronger 300 hp engine
- Quicker 6.0-second century sprint
- Smaller 508-litre boot
- AEB not listed
- Smaller 63-litre fuel tank
Range Rover Evoque
- Larger 591-litre boot
- Standard auto emergency braking
- Bigger 67-litre fuel tank
- RM50,000 pricier
- Only 200 hp and 320 Nm
- Slower 8.6-second 0-100 km/h
F-Pace vs Range Rover Evoque FAQ
Is the Jaguar F-Pace or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque better?
The Jaguar F-Pace is better for performance and price, with 300 hp, 400 Nm and a RM448,800 tag. The Range Rover Evoque is better if you prioritise boot space and AEB, with 591 litres and standard auto emergency braking.
What is the price difference?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs RM498,800, which is RM50,000 more than the Jaguar F-Pace at RM448,800.
Which is quicker from 0-100 km/h?
The Jaguar F-Pace is clearly quicker, taking 6.0 seconds from 0-100 km/h. The Range Rover Evoque takes 8.6 seconds, so the gap is 2.6 seconds.