总评
这是对紧凑型行政车需求的两个截然不同答案。Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 是更适合大马日常使用的选择：五个座位、591-litre 行李厢、67-litre 油箱、RM439 年度路税以及五年保修。Mercedes-Benz AMG CLE 则快得多，使用成本也贵得多，具备 443 hp、650 Nm 和 0-100 km/h 仅需 4.2 秒的表现，但同时只有四个座位、420 litres 行李厢空间、RM2,128 路税和两年保修。RM224,088 的差距主要买到的是速度、车身尺码和 coupe 的戏剧感。
Range Rover Evoque
如果你想要更实用的全轮驱动选择，有五个座位、更大的行李厢空间、更低路税和更长保修，就选 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque。
AMG CLE
如果你想要真正强劲的直线加速性能，并且能接受四座 coupe 布局、更高路税和更短保修，就选 Mercedes-Benz AMG CLE。
关键差异
- 价格：Land Rover Range Rover Evoque RM498,800；Mercedes-Benz AMG CLE RM722,888
- 动力和扭矩：Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 200 hp 和 320 Nm；Mercedes-Benz AMG CLE 443 hp 和 650 Nm
- 0-100 km/h：Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 8.6 seconds；Mercedes-Benz AMG CLE 4.2 seconds
- 座位和行李厢：Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 5 seats 和 591 litres；Mercedes-Benz AMG CLE 4 seats 和 420 litres
- 路税和保修：Land Rover Range Rover Evoque RM439/year 和 5 years；Mercedes-Benz AMG CLE RM2,128/year 和 2 years
- 尺码：Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 4,371 mm 车长和 1,649 mm 车高；Mercedes-Benz AMG CLE 4,853 mm 车长和 1,434 mm 车高
Range Rover Evoque
- 五个座位，相比 AMG CLE 的四个更多
- 591-litre 行李厢大得多
- 较低的 RM439 年度路税和五年保修
- 0-100 km/h 需 8.6 seconds，慢得多
- 200 hp 和 320 Nm 明显落后于 AMG CLE
- 2,681 mm 轴距较短
AMG CLE
- 443 hp 和 650 Nm 带来巨大的性能优势
- 0-100 km/h 仅需 4.2 seconds
- 2,875 mm 轴距更长
- 只有四个座位
- 420-litre 行李厢较小
- RM2,128 年度路税和两年保修
| 价格与概览 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | RM 498,800✓ | RM 722,888 |
| 车身类型 | SUV | 轿跑 |
| 级别 | Compact Executive | Compact Executive |
| 组装方式 | CBU | CBU |
| 动力系统 | ||
| 发动机技术 | 16 valve, DOHC, variable intake and exhaust cam timing, variable intake valve lift, twin-scroll turbo | 24-valve DOHC, Turbochaged with Direct Injection and Variable Valve Timing and Lift |
| 排量 | 1,997 cc | 2,999 cc |
| 马力 | 200 hp | 443 hp✓ |
| 扭矩 | 320 Nm | 650 Nm✓ |
| 气缸排列 | Inline | Inline |
| 气门正时类型 | — | 2200 |
| 燃料 | Petrol | Petrol Hybrid/REV |
| 缸径 | 83 mm | — |
| 压缩比 | 10.5 | — |
| 电机数量 | — | 1 |
| 电机马力 | — | 20 hp |
| 电机扭矩 | — | 205 Nm |
| 电池类型 | — | Lithium-ion |
| 电池容量 | — | 1 kWh |
| 传动系统 | ||
| 变速箱 | Conventional Automatic | Dual-clutch Automatic (Wet) |
| 变速箱名称 | ZF 9HP | AMG Speedshift TCT 9G automatic transmission |
| 挡位数 | 9 | 9 |
| 变速箱厂商 | ZF | Mercedes-Benz |
| 驱动方式 | All Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
| 性能与能耗 | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6 seconds | 4.2 seconds✓ |
| 极速 | 216 km/h | 250 km/h✓ |
| 尺寸 | ||
| 车长 | 4,371 mm | 4,853 mm |
| 车宽 | 1,996 mm | 2,042 mm |
| 车高 | 1,649 mm | 1,434 mm |
| 轴距 | 2,681 mm | 2,875 mm |
| 车重 | — | 2,000 kg |
| 油箱容量 | 67 litres | 65 litres |
| 车门数 | 5 | 2 |
| 座位数 | 5 | 4 |
| 行李厢容积 | 591 litres✓ | 420 litres |
| 前轮胎 | 235/50R20 | 265/35R20 |
| 后轮胎 | 235/50R20 | 295/30R20 |
| 备胎 | Space Saver | N/A, Tyre Repair Kit |
| 原厂轮胎 | Pirelli Scorpion Zero | Continental SportContact 7 |
| 底盘 | ||
| 组装方式 | United Kingdom (CBU) | Germany (CBU) |
| 底盘 | Unibody | Unibody |
| 前悬挂 | MacPherson Strut | Double Wishbones |
| 后悬挂 | Multi-Link | Multi-link |
| 前轮圈 | 21" Style 5137 Alloys | 20" AMG Y-spoke Alloys |
| 后轮圈 | 21" Style 5137 Alloys | 20" AMG Y-spoke Alloys |
| 前制动 | Ventilated Disc | Ventilated and Cross Drilled Disc |
| 后制动 | Solid Disc | Ventilated and Cross Drilled Disc |
| 转向系统 | Rack and Pinion (Electric Power Steering) | Rack and Pinion (Electric Power Steering) |
| 底盘备注 | — | AMG Ride Control Suspension with Adaptive Dampers |
| 安全配置 | ||
| 安全气囊 | Driver and Passenger, Front Side, Front and Rear Curtain | Driver and Passenger, Driver's Knee, Front Side, Front and Rear Curtain |
| ABS/EBD | ✓ | ✓ |
| 车身稳定控制 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 防盗警报 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| 气囊关闭功能 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 儿童安全锁 | Electric for rear doors | — |
| 安全带 | 5 Three-point | 4 Three-point |
| 盲点监测 | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISOFIX | Available for two outer 2nd row passenger seats | Available on Two Outer Rear Passenger Seats |
| 自动紧急制动 | Yes | Yes |
| 车道保持辅助 | Steering Correction | Steering Correction |
| 碰撞预警 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 安全带提醒 | For All Seats | All Seats |
| 灯光 | ||
| 大灯 | Adaptive LED Headlights | Digital Light Matrix LEDs |
| 尾灯 | LED with Dynamic Indicators | Full LED |
| LED 日行灯 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 后雾灯 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 后视镜转向灯 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 车厢 | ||
| 前排座椅 | Powered Front Seats with Power Lumbar | Powered Front Seats with Memory Function |
| 后排座椅 | 40:20:40 Split-folding | 50:50 Split-folding |
| 前排空调 | Dual-zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual-Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| 后排空调 | Rear AC vents | Rear AC Vents |
| 电源插座 | 1 Front, 1 Rear, 5 USBs, 1 Wireless Charger | 1 Front, 2 USB-C Front, 1 Wireless Charger, 2 USB-C Rear |
| 车内照明 | Map Lights, Ambient Lights and Boot | Map Lights and Ambient Lights |
| 杯架 | 2 front, 2 rear | 2 Front, 2 Rear |
| 音响 | 11.4" Pivi Pro Infotainment with Apple CarPlay & Android Auto, 11-speaker Meridian Sound System (400W) | 11.9" Touchscreen Mercedes-Benz User Experience with Voice Control, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto and 15-speaker Burmester Sound System |
| 便利配置 | ||
| 电动车窗 | Four windows, auto up and down with anti-pinch | Two Windows, Auto Up and Down with Anti-Pinch |
| 启动方式 | Keyless Push Button | Keyless Push Button |
| 门锁 | Keyless Operation | Keyless Operation |
| 自动启停 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 自动大灯 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 自动雨刷 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 定速巡航 | Adaptive Cruise Control | Adaptive Cruise Control |
| 换挡拨片 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 方向盘音响控制 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 方向盘上下调节 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 方向盘前后调节 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 方向盘电动调节 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 行李厢开启方式 | Powered boot | Powered Boot |
| 前泊车雷达 | 6 Sensors | 6 Sensors |
| 后泊车雷达 | 6 Sensors | 6 Sensors |
| 倒车影像 | Yes | Yes, with 360 Surround View Camera |
| 电动折叠后视镜 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | ✓ |
| 导航 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 抬头显示 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 坡道起步辅助 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 仪表盘 | Full LCD Monitor | Full LCD Monitor |
| 驻车制动 | Electronic | Electronic |
| 保修 | ||
| 保修里程（原厂） | 150,000 km | 不限里程✓ |
| 原厂保修 | 5 年✓ | 2 年 |
| 用车成本 | ||
| 路税 / 年 | RM 439✓ | RM 2,128 |
规格为每辆车所选版本。✓ 标示客观上更优的数据。路税：西马私人注册。
Range Rover Evoque vs AMG CLE 常见问题
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 和 Mercedes-Benz AMG CLE 哪个比较好？
对大多数家庭来说，Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 是更好的日常用车，因为它有五个座位、更大的 591-litre 行李厢、更低路税和更长保修。如果性能是主要优先考量，Mercedes-Benz AMG CLE 会更好。
价格差多少？
根据 RM722,888 对比 RM498,800，Mercedes-Benz AMG CLE 比 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 贵 RM224,088。
哪一款 0-100 km/h 比较快？
Mercedes-Benz AMG CLE 快得多，0-100 km/h 只需 4.2 seconds。Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 需要 8.6 seconds。
更多对比
Land Rover Range Rover EvoquevsLand Rover Range Rover VelarMercedes-Benz AMG CLEvsLand Rover Range Rover VelarLand Rover Range Rover EvoquevsMercedes-Benz CLEMercedes-Benz AMG CLEvsMercedes-Benz CLELand Rover Range Rover EvoquevsMercedes-Benz AMG GLC CoupeMercedes-Benz AMG CLEvsMercedes-Benz AMG GLC Coupe