It’s well known that vehicle pawning, or sambung bayar, in which someone pays monthly instalments to “own” a vehicle that legally does not belong to them, has been around for a long while. It’s usually employed as a way out for vehicle owners unable to pay their monthly instalments to the bank, with payment for the car being continued by a new guardian of the vehicle, who effectively leases the vehicle without owning it.
Sounds simple enough, but in practice there have been enough cases where the contract hasn’t ended in pleasant fashion, either for the owner or the “buyer.” More importantly, the very act of pawning a vehicle is illegal.
This was reiterated by the ministry of domestic trade and cost of living’s (KPDN) director-general of enforcement, Datuk Azman Adam, who reminded the public that any contract signed for the purpose of continuing vehicle payments under a sambung bayar scheme is not legally valid, Sinar Harian reports.
He said that under the hire purchase agreement signed between the owner (in this case, bank or financial institution from which the HP loan was secured) and the lessee, there is a condition that states the lessee cannot ‘sell’ the vehicle without the owner’s permission. Doing otherwise is an offense to defraud the owner under the Hire Purchase Act 1967.
Azman said that this did not mean that someone else cannot pay for the vehicle and use it, as an assignment of rights under a hire purchase agreement is permitted under Section 12 of the Hire Purchase Act 1967. However, it can only be carried out with the bank/financial institution’s permission.
In such cases, if the lessee intends to hand over his rights over the vehicle under the HP agreement, the lessee must inform the bank/financial institution of his intention and seek to obtain the bank’s permission and approval.
“If the bank agrees, the hire purchase agreement in the name of the lessee will not be terminated, but a new ‘assignment’ document will be prepared by the bank, and this will be signed by the original lessee, the bank as well as the party continuing payment for the vehicle, under the condition that the party continuing the payment is not on the blacklist of financial institutions. The rights and liabilities of the original lessee will continue to be in effect throughout the assignment period,” he said.
However, Azman said this was not the case with the majority of sambung bayar cases, with the activity happening outside the knowledge of the bank. In such scenarios, the lessee negotiates directly with the pay-as-you-go party about his intention to ‘sell’ the vehicle that is still subject to a hire purchase agreement.
“The pay-as-you-go party only needs to provide a small advance payment and continue the monthly installment payment to the bank on behalf of the lessee. Normally, the agreement between the lessee and the new party will be signed via a written contract or sometimes, just by a handshake,” he explained.
He said such cases continue to propagate because it was an easy way out for both sides – lessees unable to pay the monthly installments have a quick solution to continue payment, while those carrying out the sambung bayar process are usually those facing difficulties in obtaining vehicle loans or are blacklisted by financial institutions. Furthermore, the easy process of securing a vehicle and not having to put down a large chunk of money for it makes it tempting for those looking for an easy deal.
Azman said that while it is difficult for financial institutions to track the vehicle if the pay-as-you-go party fails to pay the vehicle’s monthly installments, the lessee is the one that will bear the burden of such behaviour, including legal action and being blacklisted.
“In addition, a lessee who is found to have sold his vehicle while the hire purchase agreement is still in place could be sentenced to a fine of up to RM30,000 or three years in jail, or both, under Section 38 of the Hire Purchase Act 1967,” he said, adding that lessees also run the risk of receiving a summons for traffic offences that he didn’t commit. As for those continuing the loan, the car isn’t yours, and it never will be.
Like it has been in the past, our advice to those thinking of pawning their vehicles or “owning” a fancy ride under a sambung bayar scheme remains the same – don’t do it. It’s illegal and not worth the hassle, even if it sounds like an easy snip at first glance.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
Pekara haram macam ni pun laku. Di sinilah tenggelam pegangan agama. Tapi diorang mesti tutup sebelah mata bila ada kepentingan sendiri. Dalam keadaan 100% sedar, haram dianggap halal. Epic
Haram dari segi agama atau haram dari segi perjanjian dengan peminjam (AKA Bank/Credit company)?
banyak perjanjian dan peraturan (undang2) yang di langgar bila kamu baca betul2. adakah bila kamu nak buat perkara seperti curi, dadah, langgar peraturan yang ditetapkan, naik miang terhadap orang bawah umur dan banyak lagi, kamu nak tengok haram dari agama ke, haram dari negara ke, apa ke, supaya perbuatan jahat kamu boleh dihalalkan? putar belit agama untuk kepentingan sendiri, kan?
Haram dianggap halal. srupo Parti hijau haramjadah… Rasuah pon jadik sedekah
Pls dont bring religion into this sambung bayar thing.
It is a stupid arrangement.Only stupid crazy people will go into such an arrangement.
Check FB Marketplace, its littered with those ads
guess which race they belong to? not racist, just statistical.
Especially in cases where the hire purchase is for up to 9 years, the buyer finds out he/she couldn’t sell off the car without 1st settling with the bank when he/she couldn’t continue paying the monthly instalments half way through. So this skim sambung bayar becomes an attractive solution, and there’s a good chance the buyer & the 3rd party do not know that it is illegal because they do not care or don’t bother to check in the 1st place.
Usually the 3rd party themself couldn’t get loan due to blacklist so the only way out is to sambung bayar those who can’t afford to pay their loans.
Match made in hell lol
Yeah, like me. I didn’t know it’s illegal but just wonder why anyone would sambung bayar. This article gives me new knowledge.
I’d want the ordinal owner to settle the payment with the bank, and I outright buy the car at a depreciated value. Why pay the original loan value?
only a certain group of people do sambung bayar. big chunk of this group of people are the same people that have low epf savings and will ask government to allow them to redraw.
why cars selling so high price? giving burden to people, and not helping on people? people also have to think for themselves, that’s why sambung bayar happens.
Very convenient, very ignorant. They think that an agreement made between the Hire-Purchase Hirer and the Sambung-Bayar Payor is valid enough.
Sometimes they are forced to do so, the resale value of the car is much lower than the bank outstanding amount, they need to top up few thousands to sell their car?
That’s the downside of taking long term hire purchase loan like for 9 years, where while the actual value of the vehicle depreciates as time passes by, the buyer is still paying the monthly instalments in accordance to the vehicle’s value when it was new. Thus, the buyer has to settle the entire 9-year monthly instalments before even considering to sell off the vehicle. The 9-year loan is deceptively attractive to the buyer because the monthly payments are lower.
Ofcourse the bank want to hv it go through them. Original owner already paid the high interest in the earlier duration of the loan. If the new owner repurchase the car through the same bank again, then he is going to have to pay a new set of interests for the same car. Bisnis maa…
Ofcourse the bank want to hv it go through them. Original owner already paid the high interest in the earlier duration of the loan. If the new owner repurchase the car through the same bank again, then he is going to have to pay a new set of interests for the same car. Bisnis maa…