总评
Mercedes-Benz EQA 要价 RM296,888,相比 Volvo XC40 Recharge Electric 的 RM278,888。就这些数据来看,它是更淡定的 EV:188 hp、前轮驱动、0-100 km/h 需 8.9 秒,但以稍长的 429 km 续航和 RM160 年度路税作为弥补。Volvo 则适合想要速度感的买家。其双马达 AWD 设定输出 402 hp,并将 0-100 km/h 缩短至 4.9 秒;行李厢也大得多,为 460 litres,对比 340 litres。续航降至 418 km,路税则升至 RM545。
如果你重视更长的 429 km 续航和更低的 RM160 年度路税,多过 Volvo 快得多的 4.9 秒加速,就选 Mercedes-Benz EQA。
如果双马达 AWD、402 hp 和 460-litre 行李厢比 EQA 的 11 km 续航优势更重要,就选 Volvo XC40 Recharge Electric。
关键差异
- 价格:Mercedes-Benz EQA RM296,888;Volvo XC40 Recharge Electric RM278,888
- 动力与驱动:Mercedes-Benz EQA 188 hp 单马达 FWD;Volvo XC40 Recharge Electric 402 hp 双马达 AWD
- 加速/极速:Mercedes-Benz EQA 8.9 s 和 160 km/h;Volvo XC40 Recharge Electric 4.9 s 和 180 km/h
- 电池/续航:Mercedes-Benz EQA 66.5 kWh 和 429 km;Volvo XC40 Recharge Electric 78.0 kWh 和 418 km
- 行李厢空间:Mercedes-Benz EQA 340 L;Volvo XC40 Recharge Electric 460 L
- 保固/路税:Mercedes-Benz EQA 4 years 和 RM160;Volvo XC40 Recharge Electric 5 years 和 RM545
EQA
- 更长的 429 km EV 续航
- 更低的 RM160 年度路税
- 更长的 2,729 mm 轴距
- 188 hp 落后于 Volvo 的 402 hp
- 8.9 秒 0-100 km/h 慢得多
- 340-litre 行李厢较小
XC40 Recharge Electric
- 402 hp 双马达 AWD
- 快速的 4.9 秒 0-100 km/h
- 更大的 460-litre 行李厢
- 较短的 418 km EV 续航
- 更高的 RM545 年度路税
- 较短的 2,702 mm 轴距
| 价格与概览 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | RM 296,888 | RM 278,888✓ |
| 车身类型 | SUV | SUV |
| 级别 | C-Segment | C-Segment |
| 组装方式 | CBU | CKD |
| 动力系统 | ||
| 发动机技术 | — | Dual electric permanent magnet synchron front and rear motors |
| 燃料 | Electric | Electric |
| 电机数量 | 1 | 2 |
| 电机马力 | 188 hp | 402 hp✓ |
| 电机扭矩 | 375 Nm | 660 Nm✓ |
| 电池类型 | Lithium-ion | Lithium-ion |
| 电池容量 | 66.5 kWh | 78.0 kWh✓ |
| 续航里程 | 429 km✓ | 418 km |
| 交流充电接口 | Type 2 | Type 2 |
| 交流充电功率 | 11.0 kW | 11.0 kW |
| 直流充电接口 | CCS | CCS2 |
| 直流充电功率 | 100.0 kW | 150.0 kW✓ |
| 传动系统 | ||
| 变速箱 | Single Ratio Automatic | Single Ratio Automatic |
| 变速箱厂商 | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| 驱动方式 | Front Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
| 性能与能耗 | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9 seconds | 4.9 seconds✓ |
| 极速 | 160 km/h | 180 km/h✓ |
| 尺寸 | ||
| 车长 | 4,463 mm | 4,425 mm |
| 车宽 | 1,834 mm | 1,863 mm |
| 车高 | 1,620 mm | 1,658 mm |
| 轴距 | 2,729 mm | 2,702 mm |
| 车重 | 2,040 kg | 2,150 kg |
| 油箱容量 | — | 49 litres |
| 车门数 | 5 | 5 |
| 座位数 | 5 | 5 |
| 行李厢容积 | 340 litres | 460 litres✓ |
| 前轮胎 | 235/50R19 | 235/50R19 |
| 后轮胎 | 235/50R19 | 255/45R19 |
| 原厂轮胎 | Continental EcoContact 6 | Pirelli P Zero Elect |
| 底盘 | ||
| 组装方式 | Germany (CBU) | Malaysia (CKD) |
| 底盘 | Unibody | Unibody |
| 前悬挂 | MacPherson Strut | MacPherson Strut |
| 后悬挂 | Multi-link | Multi-Link |
| 前轮圈 | 19" AMG Five-twin-spoke Light-alloy | 19" 5-double-spoke Alloy |
| 后轮圈 | 19" AMG Five-twin-spoke Light-alloy | 19" 5-double-spoke Alloy |
| 前制动 | Ventilated Disc | Ventilated Discs |
| 后制动 | Solid Disc | Solid Discs |
| 转向系统 | Rack and Pinion (Electric Power Steering) | Rack and Pinion (Electric Power Steering) |
| 底盘备注 | Comfort Suspension | — |
| 安全配置 | ||
| 安全气囊 | Driver and Passenger, Driver Knee, Front Side, Front and Rear Curtain | Driver and Passenger, Front Side, Driver's Knee, Front and Rear Curtain |
| ABS/EBD | ✓ | ✓ |
| 车身稳定控制 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 防盗警报 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| 气囊关闭功能 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 儿童安全锁 | Manual for Rear Doors | Power Safety Lock for Rear Doors |
| 安全带 | 5 Three-point | 5 Three-point |
| 盲点监测 | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISOFIX | Available for 2 Outer Rear Seats | Available on Two Outer Rear Passenger Seats |
| 自动紧急制动 | Yes, Active Brake Assist | Yes, City Safety with Full Auto Brake, Pedestrian, Cyclist and Large Animal Detection |
| 车道保持辅助 | Steering Correction | Steering Correction |
| 碰撞预警 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 安全带提醒 | All Seats | For All Seats |
| 安全备注 | Pre-Safe, Tyre Pressure Monitoring System | — |
| 灯光 | ||
| 大灯 | Adaptive LED Projectors | Adaptive LED Projectors with Auto High Beam |
| 尾灯 | Full LED | LED With Bulb Brake Lamps |
| LED 日行灯 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 前雾灯 | — | ✓ |
| 后雾灯 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 后视镜转向灯 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 车厢 | ||
| 前排座椅 | Power Adjustable Front Seats with Memory Function, Heated | Power Adjustable Front Seats with Driver's Memory Function |
| 后排座椅 | 40:20:40 Split-folding | 60:40 Split-folding |
| 前排空调 | Dual-zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual-zone Automatic Climate Control System |
| 后排空调 | Rear Vents | Rear Vents |
| 电源插座 | 1 Front, 2 Front USB-C, 2 Rear USB-C | 2 Front, 1 Boot |
| 车内照明 | Map Lights and Ambient Lights | Map Lights and Ambient Lights |
| 杯架 | 2 Front | 2 Front, 2 Rear |
| 音响 | Mercedes-Benz User Experience (MBUX) with 10.25" Touchscreen, Voice Control, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto and 6 Speakers | 9" Touchscreen Infotainment System with Android Automotive Operating System and 14-speaker, 600-watt Harman Kardon Sound System |
| 便利配置 | ||
| 电动车窗 | Four Windows, Auto Up and Down with Anti-Pinch | Four Windows, Auto Up and Down with Anti-Pinch |
| 启动方式 | Keyless Push Button | Keyless Push Button |
| 门锁 | Keyless Operation | Keyless Operation |
| 自动大灯 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 自动雨刷 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 定速巡航 | Active Cruise Control | Active Cruise Control |
| 换挡拨片 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 方向盘音响控制 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 方向盘上下调节 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 方向盘前后调节 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 行李厢开启方式 | Powered Boot, Contactless Opening | Powered Boot, Contactless Opening |
| 前泊车雷达 | 6 Sensors | 6 Sensors |
| 后泊车雷达 | 6 Sensors | 6 Sensors |
| 倒车影像 | Yes | Yes |
| 自动泊车 | Yes, Parallel and Perpendicular | Yes |
| 电动折叠后视镜 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | ✓ |
| 导航 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 抬头显示 | ✓ | — |
| 坡道起步辅助 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 仪表盘 | Full LCD Monitor | Full LCD Monitor |
| 驻车制动 | Electronic | Electronic |
| 配置备注 | MBUX Interior Assistant, Qi Wireless Charger | Qi Wireless Charger |
| 保修 | ||
| 保修里程(原厂) | 不限里程 | 不限里程 |
| 原厂保修 | 4 年 | 5 年✓ |
| 保修备注 | 8 Years/160,000 km Warranty for Traction Battery | 8-year/160,000 km Traction Battery Warranty |
| 用车成本 | ||
| 路税 / 年 | RM 160✓ | RM 545 |
规格为每辆车所选版本。✓ 标示客观上更优的数据。路税:西马私人注册。
EQA vs XC40 Recharge Electric 常见问题
Mercedes-Benz EQA 和 Volvo XC40 Recharge Electric 哪个比较好?
Volvo XC40 Recharge Electric 在性能和载物空间方面更好,拥有 402 hp、AWD、4.9 秒和 460 litres。Mercedes-Benz EQA 则在续航和使用成本方面更好,拥有 429 km 和 RM160 路税。
价格差多少?
Mercedes-Benz EQA 贵 RM18,000:RM296,888,对比 Volvo XC40 Recharge Electric 的 RM278,888。
哪一款 EV 续航更长?
Mercedes-Benz EQA 的额定 EV 续航更长,为 429 km,比 Volvo XC40 Recharge Electric 的 418 km 多 11 km。Volvo 的电池更大,为 78.0 kWh,对比 66.5 kWh。