Paul Tan's Automotive Industry News

2009 Mitsubishi Colt unveiled: details and photos!

Advertisement

Mitsubishi Colt

I’m sure that somewhere along the way inside Mitsubishi’s headquarters a bunch of people have been telling their design theme that the whole shark nose theme (Mitsubishi calls it a “Jet Fighter” grille) that the Lancer has going on won’t work on a small car.

But they didn’t listen, so here you have the Mitsubishi Colt major facelift for the 2009 model year. Mitsubishi claims only 35.1% carry-over parts from the pre-facelift Colt.

The new Colt also introduces the new Clear Tec brand that indicates which Colt variants are especially friendly to the environment, which will also include a Flex Fuel vehicle that will probably be able to run on petrol or a mixture of ethanol and petrol.

The Mitsubishi Colt CZT hot hatch receives a new name – the Mitsubishi Colt Ralliart, and is now available in both 3-door and 5-door form. It continues to have a 1.5 liter turbocharged engine putting out 150 PS. The suspension has had 8 different changes in different points including a thicker front stabilizer bar to reduce body roll.

Non-Ralliart engine options include a 1.1 liter inline-3 petrol engine with 75 PS and 100Nm of torque, a 1.3 liter petrol engine with 95 PS and 125Nm of torque and a 1.5 liter petrol engine with 109 PS and 145Nm of torque. These are mated to either a 5-speed manual or an AllShift automated manual gearbox.

Note that other markets come with a CVT transmission instead of this AMT transmission, including the ones we have in Malaysia. The diesel Colt has been discontinued as the pre-facelift sales mix consisted of only 13% oil burning Colts.

Look after the jump for plenty of hi-res photos of the new Colt.

PHOTO GALLERY: 2009 Mitsubishi Colt Facelift
Click thumbnails to view high resolution photo

35 Comments »

  1. merah said,

    October 3, 2008 @ 10:48 pm

    ugly rear..

  2. drgn86 said,

    October 3, 2008 @ 10:52 pm

    looks a little awkward, maybe because of its lack of width…

  3. theanswer said,

    October 3, 2008 @ 11:05 pm

    the rear looks quite decent..but the front…yeuww.. they trying to make it looks like a lancer.

  4. freeze said,

    October 3, 2008 @ 11:26 pm

    What the hell.. Thats the hundai i10’s butt!

  5. johnson wong said,

    October 3, 2008 @ 11:30 pm

    suck… the old 1 is better..

  6. MyviKiller said,

    October 3, 2008 @ 11:40 pm

    BabyMONSTA!!!

  7. xenith said,

    October 3, 2008 @ 11:48 pm

    2 words :

    Pocket Rocket..!

  8. csv said,

    October 3, 2008 @ 11:54 pm

    some body oughta shoot those designers.

  9. Capt Shopalot said,

    October 4, 2008 @ 12:19 am

    Which car manufacturer started off the trend of having same looking car over the range of classes?
    BM the W ?
    Fugly!!

  10. feez98 said,

    October 4, 2008 @ 12:26 am

    Agree….

  11. e-nabilll said,

    October 4, 2008 @ 1:05 am

    looks odd….front n the reast of the car dont really ‘flow’ together…

  12. droll said,

    October 4, 2008 @ 1:32 am

    omg…..the front just doesn’t look right!!!

  13. raybrig85 said,

    October 4, 2008 @ 7:43 am

    the front n rear are not suited…

  14. hyundai said,

    October 4, 2008 @ 9:07 am

    How come Mitsubishi makes pretty Lancer but very awful Colt??? I don’t think they can use a same design on all car…

  15. ec said,

    October 4, 2008 @ 9:28 am

    not cute anymore …
    will loose the “ladies” market ….

  16. mokkf82 said,

    October 4, 2008 @ 9:50 am

    why can’t they just cut the lancer into half and make this as the new Colt?
    At least they still able to make something more sence without having that bad combination between the rear & front.~!

  17. kkchai said,

    October 4, 2008 @ 1:23 pm

    The current Colt is better looking than new model. IMHO, the head lamp need some tweak and its body needs some stronger line.

  18. hareshi said,

    October 4, 2008 @ 1:30 pm

    Its looks so like Getz wannabe…n looks weak kinda look especially the side view…I rather go for getz then this…

  19. kei9 said,

    October 4, 2008 @ 1:54 pm

    looks cute and a potential mini-bazooka.

  20. jtshin said,

    October 4, 2008 @ 11:24 pm

    looks like old version of Fiat Punto…. poor design…

  21. kickas5car said,

    October 5, 2008 @ 3:48 am

    yes hareshi, i like your idea of continuing to support the recycling industry by getting a hyundai. while i’m at it, i’ll make sonata my next upgrade.

  22. cbljkkj said,

    October 5, 2008 @ 7:04 am

    With this new fascia, I think they should rename it to Mitsubishi Lancet.

  23. Guide2LCDTV said,

    October 5, 2008 @ 1:51 pm

    The “jet fighter” grille still look very good!!

  24. razor_clawzz said,

    October 5, 2008 @ 4:38 pm

    yeah, the design look good when miniaturized….pathetic look. Oh well, even the 08′ Accord looks ugly too…

  25. clover leaf said,

    October 5, 2008 @ 9:34 pm

    I think it is a great looking little car, hopefully they can undercut the Jazz (which I guess it would be pitched against) as well.

  26. kaka811 said,

    October 5, 2008 @ 10:39 pm

    VW golf look a like :)

  27. EnochKeng said,

    October 6, 2008 @ 12:02 am

    OMG it look so weird, like a Lancer got shrinked by a shrink-gun..

  28. jolly_idiot said,

    October 6, 2008 @ 3:37 am

    A baby lancer i may say.

  29. ReactiX said,

    October 6, 2008 @ 12:28 pm

    Nice :) small agressive baby. but surely will lose their ladies market.

  30. GlowJo said,

    October 6, 2008 @ 5:01 pm

    For sure,
    the japanese don’t really bright. The design is surely fantastic for Lancer but as for colt it looks pretty damn ugly… For me it looks like a STAR WARS alien face…

  31. torque said,

    October 8, 2008 @ 12:17 pm

    OMG! What da heck is Mitsubishi thinking? Did they actually put side by side with the previous model of Colt and compare which one is better looking? Are they blind or what? The previous one is waaaaay better looking than this…this…”thing”! Sigh! :-( Look at the bright side…they come out with new one, at least the gorgeous previous version is gonna be “cheaper”!

  32. mycristian said,

    October 14, 2008 @ 7:22 am

    oh..you all have a good instincts…but i am a designer and i know the colt story..it was a bright design of the same designer who design maybach…they use the smart “for-for” for the platform and the hart-engine of course the briliant mitsubishi mivec. The original design pay respect for the sharp shape given by the very nice combination of a continuous curved front pillar and a unique composition of tear ligts, all this design magic saves the ideea of very small front engine hood making everithing a very diferent concept..matched only by honda civic typr-r…Now the colt have a truck nose for his size..and a unhappy, ordinary hood…. It was really possible to implement the “stealth nose” grill but the horizontal head lights and the discontinous front pillar wich cannot “flow” just because somebody thinks that the masive-bulky is better than the “sharp-thin” kill all the concept….there are two diferent cars there…sory mitsubishi..i will keep my cz3 one year more..and after i will buy honda(type-r.of course)

  33. ALPINA BMW said,

    October 15, 2008 @ 3:11 pm

    the old colot was much better

  34. farhathaniff said,

    October 22, 2008 @ 6:53 am

    Old colt was ugly, and now this is worse!

    The photoshoot really did have the surroundings right though, it does look like those small people carrier kart or mini shovel that u see on sites.

    Ugly. No flow from front to back, It doest look right, like a LEGO car gone wrong.

  35. ali said,

    April 13, 2009 @ 11:31 am

    gile pelik.

Leave a Comment

Log in

Please do not submit your comment twice, the system has accepted your comment, it just needs to be moderated first. Once your first comment is approved, all subsequent comments will show automatically.

previous post: Nissan NP200 ute based on Dacia Logan pick-up
next post: Proton MPV naming contest comes to an end