FIA bans ride height control systems in Formula 1

World motor sport governing body the FIA has announced that any form of ride height control system is illegal in Formula 1. The announcement came after rumors surfaced in the paddock which suggested that the Red Bull team was using such a device in its RB6 Formula 1 car.

Apparently the device would enable a car to run closer to the ground during qualifying which helps improve downforce. With this year’s ban of mid-race refueling and the fact that the cars will have to be in “parc ferme” between after qualifying and before the race (during a “parc ferme”, mechanics are not allowed to work on the car), such a device can be very helpful.

For example, a car will run light during qualifying (with low fuel) and run closer to the ground to help improve downforce, hence generate a quicker lap time. After qualifying, the car will be fueled to the brim for Sunday’s race. This will make the car heavier and the ride height will be reduced further, to a level which is too low. To counter this, the ride height control system will give more clearance.

Red Bull’s boss Christian Horner recently revealed that the team is not running such a system. Ride height control devices in Formula 1 were actually pioneered by the Lotus team (not this year’s entrant) and Williams also used it. It was then banned in 1993. Now that the FIA is clear about this matter, it will be interesting to look at Red Bull’s qualifying performance at the Chinese Grand Prix.

Source

Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.

10% discount when you renew your car insurance

Compare prices between different insurer providers and use the promo code 'PAULTAN10' when you make your payment to save the most on your car insurance renewal compared to other competing services.

Car Insurance

Harvinder Sidhu

Harvinder Singh Sidhu thinks there's nothing better than Formula 1, not even sliced bread. Having written about cars since 2006, he plunged head first into the industry out of a passion for all things four-wheeled and everything in between. The F1 enthusiast has been following the sport since 1999 and has been keeping up with it since. In between races he keeps himself busy as the host of the Driven motoring show and as our version of the Joker.

 

Comments

  • paparadzi on Apr 08, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    Formula 1 is supposed to be the pinnacle of automotive engineering with innovative new technologies. But with new innovations being banned most the time, I wonder how Formula 1 will keep up.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • The FIA just like the driver that let the f1 rise to win…. I should not tell his name… nowadays his not driving in Ferrari nor Renault even not in red Bull Racing. I will tell that the cas is Mercedes powered engiene. FIA makes F1 much voring than the past year. they should allow those kind ofb rule. i Suggest that they shouldn’t change the f1 oiginal rules.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Finally no more of Mclaren b****ing about ride height. Lost interest in Mclaren since Kimi left.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • scanzew on Apr 08, 2010 at 8:55 pm

      interested with mclaren since Hamilton…..the pass master!!

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
      • Yea, of coz when one qualifies with top end cars at the back of the grid..
        *giggle

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
        • scanzew on Apr 10, 2010 at 12:59 am

          of course…FIA want to spice up the race…instruct lewis go to 11th place….and cases with melbourne polices…haha

          only hamilton thing’s can attract crowd!!!

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Jaybond on Apr 08, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    In those days Lotus & Williams F1 full active suspension system, was actually running on pneumatic actuators which replaced the conventional spring, and was computer controlled. If any case Red Bull is using it, most probably it is a very less sophisticated version of it.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • mitlanevo on Apr 08, 2010 at 2:31 pm

    another messed up rule by FIA, sigh…

    already lost interest in F1, too much crazy rules…..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • wth happened to FIA nowadays?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Ferruccio on Apr 08, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Firstly, this is nothing like the active suspension systems employed by teams in the late 80s to early 90s.

    However for FIA it is a case of damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

    The issue is that some teams are suspected of finding a way to cleverly adjust ride height between end of qualifying end start of race next day, during essentially ‘perc ferme’ conditions where nothing on the car should be tampered with.

    So FIA has 2 choices now in light of the claims that some teams are going against the ‘spirit of the rule’ through some loop hole:

    1. Do nothing. Allow teams to change ride heights via clever circumvention of the rules. Meaning allow them to continue because it is not ‘illegal’ by the rulebook eventhough they are achieving precisely what the rules were trying to prevent when they were written. Those taking advantage continue to benefit and others have to spend more money to take advantage of it, which goes against trying to cap costs.

    2. Rewrite the rules so it becomes more specific in its expression to stop teams exploiting the loophole.

    Which do you prefer as fan?

    The teams don’t really care. They will do whatever it takes to gain an advantage including clever interpretation or clever thinking to avoid the rules like the F-duct and this alleged ride height issue sometimes with disregard to the ‘spirit of the rule’

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • 2fast on Apr 08, 2010 at 4:26 pm

    It will be interesting to see if Red Bull is able to maintain their pace after this ban.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Ferruccio on Apr 08, 2010 at 5:09 pm

      They would be prepared for the ruling. A plan ‘B’ of sorts. Teams know that some of their secrets (especially where visual cues are more apparent ie. ride height) would be discovered eventually by other teams so it’s part of the team’s strategy to max out the advantage before they get discovered. Unfortunately the reliability issues they experienced definitely did not help and will haunt them through the rest of the season. All part of the ‘game’

      However ride height changes gives significant performance advantage. Enough to cause protest. If they lose this advantage i don’t think it will be easy to make it up through other areas of the car.

      I wonder when the Renault engines will be re-adjusted. Renault appealed to the FIA to modify the engines on grounds of reliability which the FIA accepted.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Mysticmind on Apr 08, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    you know what?

    FIA is always hate if anyone faster than ferrari.
    this is just another prove(s).

    yawn…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • AUDEE on Apr 08, 2010 at 5:32 pm

    So cool !!! every millimeter and millisecond counts

    How the world is Lotus gonna come close

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • aksMs on Apr 08, 2010 at 6:46 pm

      Audee, Lotus is not in F1 this year only. How old are you?

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
      • YesterdayLotus on Apr 08, 2010 at 7:04 pm

        Thats why they quit ! They know no chance and waste money and reputation

        But dragged back in to embarrassment by some silly Malaysians with their BOLEH this BOLEH that… just becos Proton owns Lotus

        VOMIT BLOOD !

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
        • leonardo on Apr 09, 2010 at 11:06 am

          We are talking about ride heights here…if you don’t understand anything about it just shut up.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
      • the realthing on Apr 08, 2010 at 8:50 pm

        Tony Fernandez instead of admitting how poorly Lotus
        are doing ,trying to con big time that they are the best
        team among cosworth teams. Please-lah don’t boast so
        much cos the other Cosworth teams are improving and Lotus is NOT !

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
        • Ferruccio on Apr 09, 2010 at 11:57 am

          The facts from the races are all there to be seen. Lotus is indeed the best of the newcomers without any doubt.

          However they are NOT the best among the Cosworth runners. That title goes to WilliamsF1

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Jaybond on Apr 08, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    It’s got to be a cleverly designed, chassis movement mechanism there…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • red bull going down!!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Mazda 3 MPS on Apr 08, 2010 at 9:15 pm

    why???

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Squawk on Apr 08, 2010 at 10:01 pm

    The most technologically advanced F1 cars were from the late 80s to 90s. Gone are the days. The way FIA is going about screwing with the rules, might as well just promote GP2 as F1.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Ferruccio on Apr 09, 2010 at 10:47 am

      ‘Technologically advanced’ is very subjective though I understand what you’re implying. There was more room for innovation then.

      However the fact is today’s cars are still much quicker despite the heavy limitations on innovation. In some sense it is more advanced today but only through refinement of existing technology.

      What excited me as an F1 fan back then was the technological innovation. Williams in the early 90s even developed a CVT transmission but it was never raced and FIA banned it.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • keypad (Member) on Apr 08, 2010 at 10:31 pm

    what lead to this action by FIA is that

    McLaren lodge a complaint about red bull height control that can be adjusted by the driver during the qualifying and race itself.

    in other word Red Bull was running a self-altering system and not the conventional ride height control that can only be adjusted in the pit by the mechanics.

    I guess this is like the paybcak from the Mclaren when Christian Horner of Red Bull lodge a complaint about McLaren F-duct system just before the start of 2010 season in bahrain

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • But the thing is, FIA never found anything like that on Red Bull’s car. I’ve no idea how they do it, but these will most probably be revealed at the end of the season.

      On the other hand, Mclaren said that they are going to bring in such system next week in china. That’s why the arrow might be pointing back to Mclaren.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • buttercity on Apr 09, 2010 at 9:15 am

    Errr.. Paul. Why put Petronas Mercedes GP car photo on this post? I thot it is a Red Bull issues..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Coz Mercedes GP looks better than rest of field? Hehe…
      This reply from FIA is actually pointing to Mclaren (and maybe Red Bull), maybe paul mistook Mercedes GP and Mclaren’s photo..

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • leonardo on Apr 09, 2010 at 11:00 am

    The bigger teams such as Ferrari, Mclaren, Mercedes, Renault are actually envious and worried about the performance of the mid budget team Red Bull and Torro Rosso.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Motorist on Apr 09, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    FIA keep moving the goal post that you might just as well throw away the rule book.

    It’s bad enough that spying seems to be the favourite pastime in the paddock. Now teams are looking for loop holes in the regulations.

    It’s no longer a gentleman’s sport but has become typical yobbish uncouth “winner gets to brag” “winning at all cost” sport.

    With no refueling this year, F1 has become so boring. I fell asleep after 10+laps of Sepang F1.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • we see many illegal modified cars on the road but nothing is done? what a pity..
    and f1 has become quite boring lately..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
 

Add a comment

required

required