The Vehicle End of Life policy could be reintroduced in the upcoming National Automotive Policy (NAP) revision, The Star reports. An anonymous industry source has told the daily that as a general rule, the policy could see 10- to 15-year old vehicles having to go through compulsory inspections to determine their roadworthiness.
“With the policy in place, consumers could opt for newer cars rather than using clunkers that are way past their lifespan. This would ensure continued new sales but it will only be successful with the right incentives,” he said, adding that the business of vehicle inspections could be extended beyond Puspakom centres to include qualified panel workshops.
The source did not say what would happen to vehicles older than 15 years – until a proper scrap policy is put into place, we are left guessing. The Vehicle End of Life policy was first announced in the 2009 NAP revision, stating a compulsory yearly inspection for vehicles older than 15 years as the first step towards the implementation of a full vehicle scrap policy. This was soon dropped following public protest.
Additionally, the source told The Star that regulations could be introduced for the after-market industry, including workshops, tyres and accessories shops, spare parts centres and car dealers.
The latest NAP revision is expected to be announced at the end of this year. For a sneak peek at what it could entail, read our report on our session with the MAI.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
ioma
on 
BN
on 
Jimmy
on 
_xXx_
on 
MAI and MAA bunch of dungus
on 
Low Budget
on 
Peugatti
on 
Hadi74
on 
None
on 
ioma
on 
kancil
on 
AM
on 
Monday
on 
lol
on 
Merc85
on 
CGZ
on 
ben
on 
jacksonljs
on 
gt4
on 
Aerro
on 
rexy
on 
efrny
on 
alldisc
on 
alamak
on 
klata-klata
on 
Thunderous Kitty Chan
on 
Das Auto
on 
karils
on 
khan
on 
powershot
on 
Chris
on 
abuya123
on 
amfin
on 
farghmee
on 
Alfred Chan
on 
pai
on 
helli
on 
kerata_lembu
on 
abc
on 
wong
on 
ex5
on 
intermilan
on 
Zen
on 
xman
on 
Jack
on 
magpie
on 
kekeke
on 
burn
on 
Henrick
on 
carnoisseur
on 
m4a1 carbine
on 
sonic31
on 
Ash Menon
on 
Mike Dude
on 
4agze
on 
Black Dog
on 
AVH
on 
queeze
on 
whitefox
on 
Danny
on 
BadBET
on 
CAR
on 
Jeffrey Chew
on 
Messy
on 
shoot
on 
Jinggo
on 
RejimKejamGanas
on 
Kuro Hazama
on 
raym
on 
huh?
on 
Faizul
on 
artworks
on 
whysoserious
on 
Ed
on 
Green
on 
toyoda
on 
Zyde
on 
TeacW7
on 
raj kumar
on 
wongok
on 
Angra
on 
Karl
on 
Ken
on 
Abg Long
on 
bluebird
on 
glaze
on 
john
on 
Just A Nobody
on 
EDDIE
on 
dewaSemut
on 
I
on 
thepolygon
on 
Sparcov
on 
saladin
on 
skinhunt
on 
yao fei
on 
Tokong
on 
jeremy
on 
showmetheranger
on 
apalgBNmau
on 
SamShowedMeTheHilux
on 
._.
on 
thebugbud
on 
crab
on 
monkey
on 
motorhead
on 
dodgeviper88
on 
Passerby
on 
drMpower
on 
soup
on 
Chomp
on 
ae101
on 
go-all-the-way
on 
RY
on 
intel CORE inside
on 
1MLY
on 
Denaihati
on 
CZC
on 
protong
on 
hoochiez
on 
drMsohai
on 
umnosuxblood
on 
Mark
on 
dray
on 
think
on 
norman
on 
zool
on 
Bob
on 
takNakP1
on 
PerdanaEterna
on 
Mozart
on 
Eazy
on 
Roy Mustang
on 
old dog
on 
totti
on 
cyberwarrior
on 
dadidu
on 
speechless
on 
good idea
on 
AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments mainly express concern that the Vehicle End of Life policy could burden low-income Malaysians who cannot afford new or replacement cars due to high prices, taxes, and loans. Many feel the policy is unnecessary or exploitative, citing issues like high car costs, corruption, and existing problems with car importation and used car tampering. Some suggest implementing incentives or improving public transportation before such policies. There is skepticism about government motives, viewing the policy as a way for cronyism or revenue collection rather than public safety or environmental benefit. Several comments emphasize that old cars can still be safe and well-maintained, and worry that this move may unfairly impact ordinary citizens while benefiting car dealers and cronies. Overall, sentiments are largely negative, highlighting concerns about affordability, corruption, and the true intent behind the policy.