Recently-appointed Proton chairman Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has said that the national car company is in talks with several Japanese carmakers regarding future collaborations, according to a Bernama report.
He added that any strategic collaboration is unlikely to include Mitsubishi, which is already manufacturing the ASX at Tan Chong Motor Assemblies’ Segambut plant.
“We are looking at other Japanese automotive makers. Right now we are cooperating with Honda,” Dr Mahathir said. “Proton’s performance can be improved and we will look closely at how we can continue to export our cars.
“We are going to look closely at the countries that we can export our cars (to) so that the production can be increased as we have a big production capacity, which is not utilised,” the former PM said, adding that as the Malaysian car market is small, Proton will have to focus on exports in order to expand.
Dr Mahathir also said that Proton would like to invite Japanese carmakers to come to Malaysia as the national car company had quite a big part of its production plant to offer to any investor who had the desire to produce cars in Malaysia, Bernama reported.
In a keynote address the Proton founder was delivering at a seminar entitled “Investment and Trade Opportunity in Kedah,” he said Japanese carmakers could look at Kedah, where an automotive hub was being planned.
“In Kedah, Japanese investors can benefit from the good labour force and the supply of rubber materials from both Malaysia and (neighbour) Thailand,” he added.
AD: Drive the Proton model of your dreams. Submit your details and Proton PJ will get in touch with you.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
AI-generated Summary ✨
Most comments are skeptical about Proton’s collaboration talks with Japanese carmakers, doubting the seriousness and benefits, especially given past experiences with Mitsubishi and perceived lack of innovation and quality improvement. Several believe Proton still relies heavily on rebadging older platforms like Honda Accord and Mitsubishi models, questioning whether these partnerships will lead to meaningful technological advancement or just more rebadging. There’s frustration over Proton’s long-standing struggles with quality, design, and export success, with critics suggesting that without substantial changes, collaboration may not revitalize Proton. Some comments highlight that Proton's efforts are often talk without action, and many express low trust in future prospects, believing that without restructuring or better management, Proton’s collaborations might ultimately fail to meet international standards.