Proton Holdings Bhd is seeking reimbursement from the government for the amount it has spent on research and development (R&D) to produce new cars, The Star reports.
“We have asked the government to reimburse some of the money we invested on R&D projects,” chairman Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad told reporters after launching Proton’s “Drive for Gaza” fund-raiser, a campaign aimed at helping victims in the Palestine-Israeli conflict.
“This is a normal practice in the car industry, where incentives are given to carmakers for development of new technology,” he said, citing South Korea as an example.
The national carmaker is set to launch a new car, which it said has cost as much as RM300 million to develop, before the end of the year. This new car is expected to be the much-awaited Global Small Car (code-named P2-30A).
Dr Mahathir told the English-language daily that Proton had never received any direct cash hand-outs from the government and over the years had used its own money for R&D projects.
Despite the introduction of the Preve and Suprima S (above) in the last two years, Proton shifted a meagre 52,920 cars from January to May 2014. That’s 2% less than in the same five-month period last year, when it managed 53,909, reports The Star.
Its domestic market share had also shrunk to 19% as of end-May 2014, compared with 21% a year ago.
AD: Drive the Proton model of your dreams. Submit your details and Proton PJ will get in touch with you.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
AI-generated Summary ✨
The comments express widespread skepticism and frustration regarding Proton's request for government-funded R&D costs, criticizing it as unnecessary, wasteful, and indicative of poor management. Many argue that Proton has failed to innovate or produce competitive, quality vehicles despite decades of support and government protection. There is strong sentiment that Proton's reliance on public funds, cronies, and protectionism has led to high prices, poor quality, and loss of local and foreign investment, harming Malaysia's automotive industry and economy. Several comments call for Proton to close down, emphasizing that the company has not contributed to technological advancement or economic growth and suggesting that if Proton cannot survive on its own, it should cease operations to allow genuine competition. Overall, the tone is critical, with many asserting that Proton's continued existence and demands for subsidies are unjustified and that the industry and country would benefit more without it.