There are a lot of people who feel that we just shouldn’t have had an automotive industry in the first place. Since Proton’s birth in 1983, the normal rakyat with average income have been forced to buy Protons. This is because of government protection in the form of high taxes on foreign makes.
Proton cars are perceived to be of inferior quality compared to foreign competitors. Many people say that when you buy a Proton, you need Lady Luck by your side. Sometimes you get a really good car, sometimes you get a lemon which spends more time in the service centre than being driven by you on the road.
Despite government protection, Proton’s market share has gone down from 57% in 1993 to 30% in June 2005.
On Monday, our ex-PM, the man whose Proton is his brainchild, made a somewhat sarcastic remark on these people who suggest that Proton should be closed down. Standard issue from Dr. M to make this type of statement. A quote from him:
If some feel one way to overcome the many problems we hear today is that we don’t have the automotive industry in Malaysia, we just close down.
Minister in the PM department, Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz said that this is definitely not the solution. Closing down Proton would make 300,000 workers jobless. He says that it also affects the country’s dignity, and that Proton has also made many contributions to Malaysia’s automotive industry in the past 20 years since it’s inception.
However AFTA is coming soon, and Proton cannot be protected forever. We have already postponed the new tax structures in compliance with AFTA before. We cannot postpone forever.
Malaysians are sick of inferior cars at ridiculous prices. Some have suggested that one solution would be to source components from overseas so that Proton would be more competitive. This suggests that our local components are more expensive than what we could get overseas. How true this is, I don’t know.
But I wonder, the amount purchased by Proton would be the same as what they are currently getting from local manufacturers. Business is business. Even though the overseas component suppliers have the necessary economies of scale to be competitive in component prices, what reason do they have to offer Proton the same lower prices? The order amount is still much less compared to other huge auto manufacturers who sell many more cars than Proton per year. This is why a partnership has been suggested, such as the possible Volkwagen-Proton stake exchange currently being discussed.
These decisions are all made by the big boys up there, and what most of us care about is just getting a decent vehicle to drive around.
The Cabinet will discuss the draft National Automotive Policy tomorrow at it’s weekly Wednesday meeting. We all eagerly anticipate what’s in store for us car purchasers after AFTA is implemented.
But lately, all that has resulted from the noise about APs that directly affect us as car purchasers are Korean cars being made more expensive now because of the PGE tax.
Sources: Bernama, BusinessWeek, Bernama
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
FiveElements
on 
8555
on 
burn
on 
No need to know
on 
michael lee
on 
E-Nabill
on 
eRis-Aeir4s
on 
kanasai
on 
Ihateproton
on 
Andrew
on 
blackhead
on 
swee
on 
POTTYlitical SUNDRYw
on 
babybio
on 
Jonathan
on 
aR
on 
rkaru
on 
SEE FU
on 
kereta_lumba
on 
aksMs
on 
keniji
on 
Wilfred
on 
Deodorant
on 
Joshua
on 
albagmane
on 
Dadi supporter
on 
baloi
on 
Handsfree
on 
kalen_XI
on 
rafreez
on 
mitsu_galant_2000
on 
proton crap
on 
SaDdNesZ.jc
on 
drmuzi
on 
Proton ??? what is t
on 
sekot
on 
biggie
on 
KISIO
on 
nohiddenagenda
on 
M
on 
Great Wall Of China
on 
edw
on 
neurra
on 
jx
on 
hhkonghh
on 
To close? Suffer. To
on 
Jack
on 
DAN
on 
Selvenz
on 
gegaoff
on 
shuddap
on 
H22A
on 
Lpost
on 
traitor
on 
fauzi
on 
darkfree
on 
sj
on 
macam macam ada
on 
choi
on 
Initial D
on 
AI-generated Summary ✨
The comments predominantly express frustration and disappointment with Proton's quality, management, and protection policies, many suggesting it should be shut down or sold to foreign companies like VW or Toyota to improve competitiveness. Several commenters emphasize the dependence of 300,000 workers and their families on Proton, but also criticize corruption, outdated models, and poor industry practices. There are calls for better management, open competition, and an end to government protection, believing these would lead to improvement. Some display patriotism, urging support for the local car industry, while others argue Malaysia should focus on sectors where it excels. Overall, sentiments are a mix of criticism, concern for workers, and hope for industry reform, but skepticism about the effectiveness of the upcoming National Automotive Policy.