The Mitsubishi Attrage, the sedan version of the Mirage hatchback, was previewed recently at a dealer conference in Thailand ahead of the official launch, which is said to be sometime next month.
UPDATE: Full Malaysian spec and pricing for the Attrage released – click here to view.
Courtesy of Mitsubishi Attrage Club Thailand, Mitsu BNT and reader Boon, we have pricing and pictures. Bear in mind that as far as we know, the car has not been officially launched yet, so the following prices remain unofficial:
- GLX M/T – 443k baht (RM45k)
- GLX CVT – 477k baht (RM48k)
- GLS CVT – 530k baht (RM53k)
- GLS Ltd CVT – 582k baht (RM59k)
Sharing the same 78 PS/100 Nm 1.2 litre three-pot MIVEC engine as the Mirage, the B-segment sedan is capable of returning a quoted 22 km per litre, nudging it ahead of the Nissan Almera and Honda Brio Amaze.
Standard and GLS versions get dual airbags; GLX gets only one. Six body colours are available, these being the signature Cerulean Blue Mica, as well as Red Metallic, White Pearl (6,000 baht extra), Eisen Gray Mica, Cool Silver and Pyreness Black Mica.
The Attrage will be produced at Mitsubishi Motors Thailand’s Factory Three at the Laem Chabang, Chonburi plant, and is set to make its market debut in Thailand in July, with the Philippines due to get the sedan shortly after. See the brochure here.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments generally express concern over the Mitsubishi Attrage's pricing, with many feeling it should be more affordable, ideally under RM70,000 to be competitive. Some compare it to other models like the Honda Jazz or Proton Myvi, emphasizing that the Attrage's engine capacity and features may not justify a higher price, especially given its smaller size and 1.2L engine. There are discussions about tax and import duties affecting the car's price in Malaysia, with some suggesting it could be priced significantly higher due to taxes. A few comments praise its design and efficiency, while others compare it to the "Dugong" (Vios) and see it as a smaller or less powerful alternative. Overall, most comments call for more competitive pricing and quicker launch to capture market interest.