Uber not criminally liable for fatal self-driving car crash

Uber not criminally liable for fatal self-driving car crash

Uber is not being held liable for the death of a woman who was killed by one of its autonomous cars in the US last year, a court investigation has found. The woman, Elaine Herzberg, 49, was killed when an autonomous Volvo XC90 struck her at 70 km/h while walking her bicycle across a road in Tempe, Arizona.

Despite having decided the ride-hailing company is not criminally liable for the accident, a county official said the car’s human backup driver, Rafaela Vasquez, could still face legal charges.

The police reports that Vasquez was distracted at the time of the crash, with evidence suggesting she may have been streaming an episode of The Voice on her smartphone. The fatal accident could have been avoided had she had her eyes on the road instead, the police added.

The accident happened along a dimly-lit road when Herzberg, apparently a homeless woman, crossed the street on the fateful day of March 18, 2018. Since then, the Arizonian state has banned Uber’s self-driving car test programme. Below is an actual video footage showing Vasquez’s actions prior to the crash.

Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.

10% discount when you renew your car insurance

Compare prices between different insurer providers and use the promo code 'PAULTAN10' when you make your payment to save the most on your car insurance renewal compared to other competing services.

Car Insurance

Matthew H Tong

An ardent believer that fun cars need not be fast and fast cars may not always be fun. Matt advocates the purity and simplicity of manually swapping cogs while coping in silence of its impending doom. Matt's not hot. Never hot.

 

Comments

  • Wow! Cash is king indeed! Money solves everything in USA.

    Poor dude who was just a technician in the car.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  • Crony on Mar 11, 2019 at 10:22 am

    Hmm….. so meaning if my driver were to run over someone, he is not liable but I might be charged instead? Just another reason not to bring my driver during my trips to USA.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  • digidigi on Mar 11, 2019 at 10:50 am

    Means that human eyes still better than you radar la….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
  • Safety First on Mar 11, 2019 at 11:19 am

    Money wins, real human crash test dummies lose.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  • YB Kunta Kinte on Mar 11, 2019 at 11:47 am

    In Malaysia we better not have autonomous. Cause the backup driver will usually be tido.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3
    • Isn’t that the point of autonomous driving or were you that clueless about what are you talking?

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  • Why we need self driving? If u can’t drive, then don’t drive!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  • Mopar on Mar 11, 2019 at 5:33 pm

    How could Uber not held responsible? It’s their software shortcoming or inability to recognise forward collision that cost a human’s life. What kind of law was that?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
    • Logical Deduction on Mar 11, 2019 at 7:13 pm

      Is like they said, USAF drone pilots ain’t responsible for collateral damages on civilians killed. So if any hacker were to take control of the car and kill someone, he can’t be held responsible.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
 

Add a comment

required

required