Mitsubishi Xforce vs Renault Captur
Verdict
This is a close B-SUV fight on price, but the character split is clear. The Mitsubishi Xforce costs RM2,000 more and gives you the larger shell: 4,390 mm long, 1,810 mm wide and a 410-litre boot. That matters if rear-seat and luggage space sit high on the list. The Renault Captur answers with the stronger numbers: 120 hp, 205 Nm, 10.9 seconds to 100 km/h, 192 km/h and 5.9 L/100 km. Both are CKD, petrol, front-driven, five-seat SUVs with four airbags and five-year warranties.
Pick the Mitsubishi Xforce if you want the bigger B-SUV body, longer wheelbase and larger 410-litre boot.
Pick the Renault Captur if you want more power and torque, lower listed fuel use and cheaper annual road tax.
Key differences
- Price: Mitsubishi Xforce RM109,980; Renault Captur RM107,980
- Engine output: Mitsubishi Xforce 104 hp and 141 Nm; Renault Captur 120 hp and 205 Nm
- Size: Mitsubishi Xforce 4,390 mm long and 1,810 mm wide; Renault Captur 4,122 mm long and 1,778 mm wide
- Wheelbase and boot: Mitsubishi Xforce 2,650 mm and 410 L; Renault Captur 2,606 mm and 377 L
- Transmission: Mitsubishi Xforce CVT automatic; Renault Captur dry dual-clutch automatic
- Road tax: Mitsubishi Xforce RM120 a year; Renault Captur RM85 a year
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM 109,980 | RM 107,980✓ |
| Body type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | B-Segment | B-Segment |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Assembly | CKD | CKD |
| Powertrain | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,499 cc | 1,197 cc |
| Power | 104 hp | 120 hp✓ |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 205 Nm✓ |
| Transmission | CVT Automatic | Dual-clutch Automatic (Dry) |
| Driven wheels | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | — | 10.9 s |
| Top speed | — | 192 km/h |
| Efficiency | ||
| Fuel economy | — | 5.9 L/100km |
| EV range | — | 0 km |
| CO₂ | — | 0 g/km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,390 mm | 4,122 mm |
| Width | 1,810 mm | 1,778 mm |
| Height | 1,660 mm | 1,567 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,650 mm | 2,606 mm |
| Boot space | 410 L✓ | 377 L |
| Fuel tank | 42 L | 45 L |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 4 | 4 |
| Auto emergency braking | — | — |
| Ownership | ||
| Warranty | 5 | 5 |
| Road tax / year | RM 120 | RM 85✓ |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
Xforce
- Larger exterior footprint
- Longer 2,650 mm wheelbase
- Bigger 410-litre boot
- Less power and torque
- Higher RM120 annual road tax
- No 0-100 km/h or fuel economy figure listed
Captur
- Stronger 120 hp and 205 Nm output
- Listed 5.9 L/100 km fuel economy
- Lower RM85 annual road tax
- Smaller 377-litre boot
- Shorter 2,606 mm wheelbase
- Dry dual-clutch gearbox may not be your preferred automatic type
Xforce vs Captur FAQ
Is the Mitsubishi Xforce or Renault Captur better?
The Renault Captur is better on performance and running-cost numbers, with 120 hp, 205 Nm and 5.9 L/100 km. The Mitsubishi Xforce is better if size matters, with a longer body, longer wheelbase and 410-litre boot.
What is the price difference?
The Mitsubishi Xforce is RM2,000 more expensive, at RM109,980 versus RM107,980 for the Renault Captur.
Which SUV has the bigger boot?
The Mitsubishi Xforce has the bigger boot at 410 litres. The Renault Captur has 377 litres, so the Xforce gives you an extra 33 litres for luggage.