Mazda CX-3 vs Renault Captur
Verdict
For Malaysian buyers, the Mazda CX-3 and Renault Captur present compelling options in the B-segment SUV market. Priced closely at RM 107,920 and RM 107,980 respectively, the Captur offers slightly more power at 120 hp and significantly higher torque at 205 Nm, which translates to better acceleration and responsiveness. However, the CX-3's larger engine capacity of 1,496 cc may appeal to those seeking a more robust driving experience. With a boot space of 350 L versus the Captur's 377 L, the Captur also edges ahead in practicality, making it a strong contender for families.
Pick the CX-3 if you prefer a more traditional engine setup and driving dynamics.
Pick the Captur if you value higher torque and a more spacious boot.
Key differences
- Power: CX-3 114 hp vs Captur 120 hp
- Torque: CX-3 149 Nm vs Captur 205 Nm
- Length: CX-3 4,275 mm vs Captur 4,122 mm
- Boot space: CX-3 350 L vs Captur 377 L
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM 107,920✓ | RM 107,980 |
| Body type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | B-Segment | B-Segment |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Assembly | CBU | CKD |
| Powertrain | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,496 cc | 1,197 cc |
| Power | 114 hp | 120 hp✓ |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 205 Nm✓ |
| Transmission | Conventional Automatic | Dual-clutch Automatic (Dry) |
| Driven wheels | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | — | 10.9 s |
| Top speed | — | 192 km/h |
| Efficiency | ||
| Fuel economy | — | 5.9 L/100km |
| EV range | — | 0 km |
| CO₂ | — | 0 g/km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,275 mm | 4,122 mm |
| Width | 1,765 mm | 1,778 mm |
| Height | 1,535 mm | 1,567 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,570 mm | 2,606 mm |
| Boot space | 350 L | 377 L✓ |
| Fuel tank | 48 L | 45 L |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 2 | 4✓ |
| Auto emergency braking | — | — |
| Ownership | ||
| Warranty | 5 | 5 |
| Road tax / year | RM 120 | RM 85✓ |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
CX-3
- More engine capacity for a robust feel
- Slightly longer for better rear legroom
- Established CBU quality
- Less torque compared to Captur
- Fewer airbags (2 vs 4)
Captur
- Higher torque for better acceleration
- More boot space for practicality
- More airbags for safety
- Slightly higher price
- Smaller engine capacity may affect performance
CX-3 vs Captur FAQ
Is the CX-3 or Captur better?
The better choice depends on your priorities; the CX-3 offers a traditional driving experience, while the Captur excels in torque and practicality.
What is the price difference?
The CX-3 is priced at RM 107,920, while the Captur is slightly higher at RM 107,980.
Which has better fuel economy?
The Captur boasts a fuel economy of 5.9 L/100km, making it more efficient compared to the CX-3.