DRIVEN: Mazda MX-5 ND 2.0 – heightened sensations

Mazda MX-5 2.0 Review 9

“It’s important not to get hung up on numbers. Not on power, or torque. No, what is more important is the feeling. The driving experience and feeling is more important than power. In my mind it just has to be fun to drive,” Nobuhiro Yamamoto, programme manager of the latest Mazda MX-5, told Top Gear.

Do you agree with the thinking behind the MX-5?

Unlike some philosophies that aren’t debated because they’re too abstract, this is one of those things that divide car enthusiasts. One is no less a petrolhead if he’s in the turbocharged hot hatch camp, sniggering at this red ND as a wimpy machine for poseurs.

On the other hand, there are those who swear by the joys of a sporty naturally-aspirated engine, more so when it’s allied to a lightweight RWD chassis. There’s also much to be said about the open-top experience, which you must know it to love it.

You’ve undoubtedly read fantastic things about this fantastic little car, but it really isn’t for everyone, even many car enthusiasts. Here’s why.

Mazda MX-5 2.0 Review 5

The fourth-genration Mazda MX-5 was revealed to the world in September 2014, and a gradual roll out across the world saw us getting the roadster in August last year. Lots of tugging at enthusiast heartstrings in between made it a much-anticipated launch, even if few will eventually own one.

The big news here is that the world’s best selling roadster is going back to its roots. As we age, our waistlines expand, and the little Mazda wasn’t immune to the trend – although the third-gen NC wasn’t exactly obese at around 1,150 kg, it had gone past the four-metre mark and gained 200 kg from the original. The trend had to be reversed, and Mazda set out to shave the grammes from the start with the ND.

The ‘Gram Strategy’ employed to trim unnecessary mass resulted in kerb weight that starts below 1,000 kg, which is 10% less than before and close to the NA’s 940 kg – no mean feat considering the relatively generous equipment levels (it’s no stripped out Lotus) and safety standards that today’s cars require.

Mazda MX-5 2.0 Review 2Mazda MX-5 2.0 Review 1

Aluminium was used for the suspension (front double-wishnones, rear multi-links), engine frame, bumper reinforcements and those shapely front wings. The structure uses more high-tensile steel than before, too.

By the way, the MX-5 scored four stars in the Euro NCAP crash test; one star less than max not because of the lack of crash protection, but the unavailability of autonomous emergency braking.

At 3,915 mm long, 1,730 mm wide and 1,235 mm high, the ND MX-5 is actually shorter than the NA from 25 years ago, besides being 105 mm shorter, 10 mm wider and 10 mm lower than the NC it replaces. Throw in 50:50 weight distribution with the driver behind the wheel, the lowest ever centre of gravity in MX-5 history, and you have a great recipe for a sports car.

Mazda MX-5 2.0 Review 3

Low weight doesn’t need big power, and the ND is available with a 1.5 litre naturally-aspirated engine with just 129 hp and 150 Nm, a motor smaller in capacity than the NA’s starter 1.6. But local importer Bermaz Motor has elected to only bring in the bigger and biggest available engine for the roadster, a 2.0 litre SkyActiv-G engine with 158 hp at 6,000 rpm and 200 Nm of torque at 4,600 rpm.

Why not the 1.5? “Because it’s a no-no in this country for a sports car. Why would you want a 1.5 litre when you can have a 2.0 litre?” asked Bermaz boss Datuk Seri Ben Yeoh. We can’t argue with that.

Made available with North America in mind, the naturally-breathing 2.0L four-cylinder sits longitudinally in front, with drive going to the rear wheels via a six-speed SkyActiv-Drive torque converter automatic transmission, hooked up to manual mode and steering wheel shift paddles. Also in are Mazda’s i-stop auto start-stop system working together with i-Eloop energy regeneration. 0-100 km/h in 8.0 seconds.

Something missing? That’s the SkyActiv-MT six-speed manual gearbox specially-adapted for the ND, and its unavailability here is a real shame. While the local Mazda arm did promise a manual “in a couple of months” at the launch, there has been no update on this front. Could be a lack of demand, so if you’re heading over to Bermaz to beg for a stick shift, do share with us the result.

Does the lack of a manual ruin the MX-5 experience? This car is too well-conceived and talented for that to happen, but the performance of the automatic did leave this writer hankering for a DIY ‘box.

Response is far from immediate in normal mode, but feels a touch too hyper and jumpy in Sport, which you can activate via a switch behind the gear knob. There are paddles, but it really shouldn’t come to that.

Mazda MX-5 2.0 Review 69

The 6AT is efficiency-focused, and its modus operandi is to get up to the two highest ratios as soon as possible, and stay there unless heavily provoked. It cruises serenely at just 1,500 rpm at 90 km/h and 2,000 rpm at the highway limit, contributing to decent fuel economy – the trip computer indicated 7.4 litres per 100 km (13.5 km/l) over three days of regular driving, and even after a day of hard running and long idling for photography, stood at 7.7 litres per 100 km.

Not everything is immediately better with a manual, and a slushbox has its merits even in a sports car, but the SkyActiv-Drive’s character isn’t fully in-tune with the MX-5, which is as lively as you can imagine.

Now that we’ve got the only drive-related issue out of the way, the Mazda MX-5 is as advertised. Like how superheroes first discover special powers, I experienced heightened senses in my first few hours with the car. Sounds that are normally muted or distant came at me from all directions, and this writer was as alert as a cat, even if his internal compass needed more calibration. With the top up, by the way.

The MX-5 is clearly not a normal car by most standards. I’m coming from a Honda CR-Z with two doors, a 2+0.5+0.5 cabin and a low seating position, but the MX-5 interior is significantly cozier and lower. It’s pretty much the lowest riding car on the road unless a Lotus pulls up alongside, and the typical view out of the ND is of its curved cowling and other vehicles’ bumpers.

Just enough space for the serious work of driving, nothing more. The lack of conveniently-located storage spaces is something the MX-5 owner will have to get used to. There are no door pockets and just a small slot under the AC controls for a mobile phone. Keys and access cards will have to go into the tiny cubby under the armrest, SmartTags into the cupholders, wallet between your thighs.

I belatedly found a solution of zipping all knick knacks into a toiletry bag, which sat snug at the base of the centre stack. Glove box? No such thing here, although there’s a storage box behind the seats. It’s wide enough to swallow a DSLR, but is two-tier in height and access can be obstructed by drinks in the cupholder.

Mazda MX-5 2.0 Review 41

Due to a habit of emptying all pockets before I set off, I found the lack of convenient storage harder to get used to compared to the cabin size itself. I don’t remember the first-gen Toyota MR-2 and MR-S being so uncompromising, so those coming from normal sized cars might need some orientation.

But get over the small issues you must, because the MX-5 provides a driving experience that could well be the most raw and involving in today’s car world. Like good sashimi, less is more here.

The ND fires up with a rorty engine note, which you’ll hear plenty of with the top up. You’ll feel the buzz too, and the lack of insulation is something to be celebrated in this context. Just a few corners in and the MX-5’s communicative nature is apparent – feedback comes in the form of engine fizz and volume, and sensations filter through the steering, pedals and seat.

Speaking of the seats, the manual chairs aren’t heavily bolstered but are supportive enough, and a great driving position can be found for this 175 cm writer despite the non-rake adjustable steering. The transmission tunnel’s intrusion into the already small footwell may look severe, but it doesn’t affect the driving. The body-coloured upper door caps – in our case a deep, lustrous “Mazda red” – look convincing as extensions of the outer body, and add some sense of occasion to a functional cabin.

Push on and you’ll appreciate the pointy nose and sharp responses of the ND, plus decent feel and good weighting (not too heavy) from the electric power steering. Sitting close to the fulcrum of the roadster as you interact with it, you are now part of what Mazda calls Jinba Ittai, horse and rider as one.

Interestingly, unlike many cars with sporty intentions, the MX-5 allows for some body roll in the corners, apparent when you power into the first highway entry ramp. Not unnerving, the lean is actually pretty refreshing, and fits in with the organic nature of the ND’s ride and handling.

Cruising on the highway, you stick to the speed limit, because 110 km/h feels a lot faster than it normally does – the earlier mentioned lack of insulation combining with substantial wind noise. This would have been a negative point for most cars, but the MX-5 is not most cars.

Exit on to a B-road and the roadster flows along instead of hopping and bucking around our scarred tarmac, aided by generous suspension travel and good bump absorption.

Ride comfort is a strong point, and it’s clear someone in Mazda took into consideration more challenging road surfaces when developing the suspension. An unsettling ride can take the fun out of road driving, so we’re happy to note that there’s no such distraction here. There are SUVs that are less-forgiving on this count. By the way, our MX-5 rides on the larger 17-inch wheels (205/45 rubber, base rim is 16-inch), which work well aesthetically.

Mazda MX-5 2.0 Review 8

Favourite stretch of road located, you floor the pedal in search for thrills. The vocal 2.0 litre SkyActiv motor serves up a strong mid-range to get you up to speed, although there’s no high-end crescendo waiting at the top. Take a few corners in anger and the MX-5 feels more like a proper sports car than a rear-wheel drive special like the Toyota 86.

There’s strong bite from the front end and good traction out of corners. The roadster’s pert butt isn’t as easy to unstick as some might think, although there are hints of a lively tail to remind you that it’s rear driven. Trail braking into corners does the trick, with an obliging DSC there to monitor proceedings.

With the knowledge that RM 8000 belongs to the Bermaz boss, I did not once smoke the rear wheels, but you don’t have to go sliding to enjoy driving the MX-5. That’s not its raison d’être.

Mazda MX-5 convertible roof operation

We simply love the simplicity of the Mazda MX-5's manual convertible roof! Single-handed operation. Learn more about the Mazda MX-5:http://paultan.org/2015/08/21/mazda-mx-5-launched-in-msia-2-0l-6sp-auto-rm220k/http://www.carbase.my/mazda/mx-5

Posted by Paul Tan's Automotive News on Tuesday, 26 January 2016

As you wind down and wipe the smile off your face, use a moment to take in the ND’s serpent nose, the impossibly small eyes, and those sinewy lines that wrap around a perfectly proportioned roadster. Even the soft top blends into the design, although those uniquely-shaped tail lamps haven’t grown on me yet.

The MX-5 is a head turner, more so in this tight red dress. To all the ladies who turned to check this driver out, I’m sorry to have disappointed you.

The long journey home is the perfect opportunity to complete the MX-5 experience by going topless. Easier than taking off your own top, all you need to do is unfasten a spring-loaded latch and push back the fabric roof till you hear a click, as demonstrated by colleague Jonathan Lee in the video above.

Mazda MX-5 2.0 Review 72

It just takes one hand, two motions, a few seconds and not a lot of strength to completely transform the experience. Opening and closing the roof can also be done by your companion, and at low speeds, too. Windows up, two can have a normal conversation without the need to raise volume, and only the top of my scalp was ruffled. Like al fresco dining, you don’t want to do it all the time, but it’s a real treat in the right conditions.

The Mazda MX-5 is a throwback to the days when cars were more simple, a sensory overload in a cold and digital four-wheeled environment. But it’s also a capable sports car, and one that is equipped for the modern world – adaptive LED headlamps, keyless entry, Bose speakers in the headrests, MZD Connect with seven-inch touchscreen and lane departure warning are all standard on Malaysian cars.

Just as well, because this tiny roadster costs RM219,999 on-the-road without insurance in Malaysia, a princely sum for what was conceived as an affordable sports car. At this price range, the MX-5 is open to competition from cheaper and faster new cars (hot hatches) and more prestigious options in the grey/used market (think Audi TT, Porsche Cayman). It’s the same problem faced by fellow Japan CBU import Toyota 86.

Mazda MX-5 2.0 Review 11

The MX-5’s pure, minimalist approach to driving pleasure isn’t for everyone. Performance and pleasure can be had in less focused machines that don’t require Miata levels of compromise. That’s applicable everywhere, but in Malaysia, and at RM220k, this gem of a sports car will be a very rare sight.

It’s hard to make a case for the MX-5 as a daily driver and your only car, but the Mazda would serve well as a toy in a multi-car garage. For the affluent individual with “car guy” roots, this is an unique opportunity for raw man-machine interaction that’s rare at any price. An escape from reality, the MX-5 could even remind you of when you were, you. But I bet you were driving a manual back then.

There’s hope (or should it be consolation?) for the rest of us, though. While the MX-5 is Zoom-Zoom personified, the essence of the brand value is present in the cars below the halo, as my old Mazda 6 – the first car born under the Zoom-Zoom banner – is fond to remind me of. Sensation and emotion are powerful tools, and no one uses both as well as Mazda.

Looking to sell your car? Sell it with myTukar.

Certified Pre-Owned - 1 Year Warranty

10% discount when you renew your car insurance

Compare prices between different insurer providers and use the promo code 'PAULTAN10' when you make your payment to save the most on your car insurance renewal compared to other competing services.

Car Insurance

Danny Tan

Danny Tan loves driving as much as he loves a certain herbal meat soup, and sweet engine music as much as drum beats. He has been in the auto industry since 2006, previously filling the pages of two motoring magazines before joining this website. Enjoys detailing the experience more than the technical details.

 

Comments

  • Guan yin maaaa on Feb 06, 2016 at 12:20 am

    If 2.0 CBU Mazda 3 can get RM 150k, why this same 2.0 CBU same engine MX5 RM220k ?? Both priced at same 2mil YEN. Please bermaz explain to me.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 29 Thumb down 7
    • BERMAZ on Feb 06, 2016 at 10:15 pm

      Because MX-5 is a convertible coupe roadster! And, our beloved gov. tax this kind of special car EXTRA…

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 2
      • Where got hohh, our Gomen give us so cheap cars lah. Be grateful. Tak suka, anda boleh keluar!

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 8
        • Wah ur DAP bosses din gip u 1st day CNY leave kah. I pity my RBA clone. But dun worry, I wish u a Onederful Gong Xi Fa Cai

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2
          • Same L0rrrr on Feb 11, 2016 at 2:27 pm

            CX5 or MX5, you are safe as long as you are not touching Proton and kimchi.

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  • JB_KIA on Feb 06, 2016 at 1:23 am

    pathetic…why mimicked MT shift stick?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 3
  • Seiko Matsuda on Feb 06, 2016 at 4:08 am

    The price too steep for me and I also need rear seats just in case. If only Bermaz bring in the manual Mazda 2 when the LED headlamp version comes.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
  • Atilla on Feb 06, 2016 at 7:33 am

    Pity its not at an acceptable price point for well heeled joy car shoppers. RM170k-ish could have done the trick.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  • Their innovative and creative mind never fail to amaze me.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  • sepul on Feb 06, 2016 at 9:48 am

    I wish it was way cheaper. Ditch the Bose sound system, leather seats, keyless entry and start, i-Eloop, lane departure warning, and put manual box in. The only thing I like it in automatic is the aircond.

    Please, Bermaz.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 5
  • redidiot on Feb 06, 2016 at 1:44 pm

    if Mazda made a coupe version with dual cltuch ‘box, i’d sell my soul to get one.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5
    • Proton achieving 15% TIV in 2015 on Feb 06, 2016 at 7:49 pm

      Mazda don’t go down the route of dual clutching, it’s skyactive 6 speed is a gem of all torque converter, better still, the ultimate short-throwing 6 speed shifters that comes with three pedals, whoooohoooo!

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
  • kampungEGGpower! on Feb 06, 2016 at 1:57 pm

    can tell readers why not a 86 but this mx5?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
    • They can’t. Coz they know the 86 is a better car, a true legend and better look than the awkward looking mx5. Plus, 86 exhaust note sounds a lot better owh yess. 86 has more character. Good example is the 86mm diameter twin exhausts.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 20
      • W204 C63 AMG on Feb 07, 2016 at 3:55 pm

        In a straight line the 86 is slower than the MX-5. On a track, the 86 is also slower than the MX-5. Other than having 2 useless rear seats on the 86, I can’t think of an advantages it has over the MX-5. Stop glorifying the 86, the 86 now is not the 86 back then, whereas the MX-5 is still the same MX-5 from back then. People who glorify the 86 is the same as the MU, Arsenal and Liverpool fans, stop dwelling in the past and come to the present.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 2
        • Carlos on Jun 04, 2016 at 10:20 pm

          Shadap if hv not driven an 86, or even own one. That car is a beauty. Talk about storage space advantage over the sempit mx5. And the rear seats? My two kiddies love em. Booo…

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
    • jesusVan on Feb 07, 2016 at 1:26 pm

      exactly! 86 all the way..

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 6
  • If only the car price same as the “RM8000” on the reg plate on this car….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
    • U got it wrong. Thats what u need to earn per month to afford this car.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 5
      • U got it wrong again. Earning RM8000 can’t get u this car, only Mazda 6. Earning at least RM10000 will do.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
        • That means u din budget enuff for ur mid-life crisis. 8k is more than enuff

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
          • Akira on Feb 10, 2016 at 10:26 pm

            Still can’t afford to buy one if you have little ones or otherwise “abah nak ikuuutt” and then you realise you only have two seats

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Turboman on Feb 06, 2016 at 2:49 pm

    This car feels like the venerable smart roadster, made by Mercedes about 10 years ago. Lightweight, small engine, 60kmh feels like 100kmh. In fact it was the most fun i ever had with my clothes on.

    Had to sell it in 2011. While Merc/smart was chasing lightness, reckon the integrity of parts became questionable. I sheared an engine mounting bolt while accelerating uphill. Never heard of such thing before in any car. Did wish for a japanese equivalent of that car when I sold it, and my prayers are answered. The NC sold in Malaysia ( especially the PRHT ) weighs more than a tonne, too heavy for such a vehicle.

    Unfortunately this ND is RM60k more expensive than the roadster ( RM158k ), and 100kg heavier. The roadster weighs in at 840kg ( give or take depending on trim levels ). 0-100 of that roadster is 10.9 sec but that is due to the slow AMT gearbox. Factor that out and its around 8.5 sec ( Gtech times – gear change time. Not scientific, but it gives u an idea of its ingear acceleration ).

    PLease Bermaz, give me a manual, cloth seats, take out the Bose ( who cares when all u can hear at 60kmh is the engine, road and wind noise, elise has an Alpine sound system, but you can’t hear it at all past 60kmh, or 3000rpm if you have a stage II exhaust), 16″ rims, take out that screen, the “I-Drive” type system, and sell it at RM170k. You have a buyer waiting. This is a purist car for people who appreciates driving on B roads. Those “luxuries” only distract the driver from the real purpose of this car.

    Bermaz, hope you are listening.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 46 Thumb down 2
  • nabill (Member) on Feb 06, 2016 at 3:30 pm

    Its just not cheap enough (atleast in msia)
    No matter how fun it is, the roof is 99% pointless in our local weather…
    U can get a 208GTI if u love manuals, with tons more power, not much heavier, n soooo much cheaper, there are better options in that price being new or slightly used…. Nice car, wrong country!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 22
    • Turboman on Feb 06, 2016 at 6:31 pm

      Agree on it being not cheap enough and 208GTI being a good car.

      But disagree with convertable being pointless. Well, if you intend to open your roof at 12pm in rushhour downtown KL, you are right. Its pointless.

      But pick the weekends, 7am drive with the roof down on genting sempah, and you forgot why were u stressed in the week again.

      Roof down at 5pm along the beach and life is good. Wait, not just good, it is awesome. At night around pj/damansara, simply intoxicating.

      Its something you got to try to believe. Cause once you do, no turning back.

      And the manual roof means you can open/close many times and not worry about motor/hydraulic mechanism breaking down, which in this country would cost a kidney to fix on many convertables.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 3
  • 2ltrbottle on Feb 07, 2016 at 10:56 pm

    Looks like proton iriz’s aircond knob to me.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
 

Add a comment

required

required