During a recent press conference at Big Blue Taxi Services’ headquarters, company founder Shamsubahrin Ismail voiced his displeasure at the proposed introduction of Gojek in Malaysia, FMT reports.
Rather than bringing in a motorcycle-based ride-hailing service, Shamsubahrin preferred if the government focused on resolving the issues involving e-hailing and taxi drivers in the country, instead of supporting Gojek, a move he deemed a “step backwards.”
“Syed Saddiq is an educated minister but while other ministers are talking about flying cars and third national cars, he is asking young people to become dispatchers. Gojek as a career will not ensure a promising future, our youths deserve better than that.” Shamsubahrin’s statements come after the youth and sports minister expressed his intent to bring Gojek to Malaysia.
He also explained that the situation in Malaysia was “totally different” from Indonesia, saying that “Gojek can be done in Indonesia because their poverty rate is very high, unlike in Malaysia. Also, their culture is very different compared with ours. In Indonesia, their women can hug the rider just like that but how about Malaysia? Do we want to see our women hugging the riders here and there?”
On the matter of job creation, Shamsubahrin stated the government should not encourage youths to provide motorcycle ride-hailing services as a source of income. “Gojek, FoodPanda, GrabFood all offer part-time jobs. Youths should instead be given better job opportunities,” he said.
He also warned that taxi drivers, e-hailing drivers and bus drivers would be affected if the government approved Gojek. Shamsubahrin added that he would not hesitate to organise a protest if the government ignored the company’s standpoint. “I will lead the protest myself, we will go to Putrajaya, and if possible, we will do it in front of Syed Saddiq’s house and Loke’s house,” he said.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
seancorr (Member)
on 
Why Grab Has Gone Up in Prices?
on 
4bini
on 
fez ak
on 
Victor Lee
on 
Gary
on 
harimau
on 
Crony
on 
Sabri Tahir
on 
History Bender
on 
Feedlot
on 
joe
on 
Zahrin Mahmood
on 
pengguna proton kecewa
on 
doctor zakir turun
on 
NoBrainer
on 
Malaysian mentality
on 
linsong88
on 
casual rider
on 
Commenter
on 
Wth
on 
msia driver
on 
StingerKia
on 
Ben Yap
on 
Alan Holden
on 
newme
on 
newmesohai
on 
Mr. Octopus
on 
Not Toyota Fan
on 
Bob
on 
Ajibkor
on 
isengard12
on 
thepolygon
on 
Steve
on 
sardin
on 
Jaguh
on 
AllergicToIdiots
on 
Pyraxle
on 
Peter
on 
Habiby Is
on 
Kalimaca
on 
vVivi Zurianti
on 
KingBob
on 
haha
on 
Robert K.P. Waran
on 
Jim
on 
5967
on 
yus
on 
NUAR
on 
AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments on the blog post express strong opinions about Gojek's potential impact, with many supporting its benefits such as creating jobs for youths and easing traffic congestion, especially in Jakarta-style scenarios. Several commenters criticize the existing taxi industry, perceiving it as outdated and protective of privileges. There is significant concern over protests and the negative influence of taxi drivers' resistance, which purportedly lead to higher ride costs and job losses for drivers. Some comments touch on cultural and moral issues, suggesting the government should focus on road safety, law enforcement, and proper regulations before implementing Gojek. A few comments include off-topic remarks and personal attacks, but overall, the sentiment favors progress and innovative solutions over resistance from traditional taxi associations.