Earlier this week, DAP chairman Lim Guan Eng spoke about the 18% reduction in PLUS toll rates when Pakatan Harapan was in power, adding that PH “can abolish tolls” on the highway if it wins the 15th general election (GE15) and gets another term as the government.
Now, Gerakan Tanah Air (GTA) chairman Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is questioning that pledge, saying that it’s an old promise and one that’s not feasible.
According to FMT, the two-time former prime minister questioned where the funds would come from to repair the highways, if not from tolls.
“They (previously) claimed that they will abolish tolls. This time around, they are still promising to do the same. I don’t believe the people will support them because they know that the country needs tolls,” the Langkawi MP said at a GTA event in Bangi yesterday.
Now, some might point to Germany’s Autobahn being high speed, safe and toll-free. That’s true, but that federal highway network – famous for having ‘no speed limits’ – is somewhat of an outlier in being free for cars, even in Europe. It’s harder to collect no tolls when you need the private sector to fund construction costs and maintenance, as is the practice here. What’s your take on this toll issue?
By the way, both Lim and Mahathir were on the same side making the same promise in the last GE.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
Sohai
on 
DonkeyKong
on 
Civic Turbo 2018
on 
Angry Voters
on 
Sunny
on 
GTX
on 
Just stfu
on 
Lolwhut?
on 
davenport
on 
Sick & Tired
on 
Amran
on 
Ada akal guna
on 
Amir
on 
BIG
on 
Rakyat Malaysia
on 
Squid
on 
JQ
on 
niuh
on 
mika
on 
kontol
on 
Wong
on 
Katheryne Wong
on 
Celup King
on 
Autodriver
on 
Pak Sakau
on 
Farhan
on 
Loke Peng
on 
@Snakebabu
on 
PT reader
on 
Kea Was
on 
Phudda singh
on 
Raja
on 
Hahaha
on 
Made In China
on 
AL
on 
Ben Yap
on 
hazri
on 
leo
on 
Fed up
on 
Bjay
on 
Francis
on 
Levin
on 
G-M
on 
call me by your name
on 
AI-generated Summary ✨
The comments largely criticize the government’s stance on toll abolishment, with many doubting its feasibility due to existing contracts and financial implications, and emphasizing the importance of transparency and fair toll rates. Some express frustration over high taxes and perceived mismanagement, questioning whether tolls are necessary for highway maintenance or if taxes should suffice. Several comments reject the notion that tolls are essential, advocating instead for reduced or fair toll rates and better government accountability. A few comments touch on political issues, cynicism towards promises made and broken, and the impact of corruption. Overall, sentiments range from skepticism about toll abolition to calls for transparency and efficient management, with many questioning the government’s priorities and integrity.