New alternative transmission technologies

Most of you have heard of all of the mainstream gearbox types – the classic manual, the slushbox torque converter automatic, the automated manual with a computer controlled clutch, the dual clutch automated manual, and finally the continuously variable transmission. That’s not all there is to transmission technology though, as there are a few smaller engineering companies out there with some innovative ideas of their own.

More after the jump.

Antonov 6-speed by Antonov

antonovThe Antonov transmission was created back in 2003, and uses two three-speed planetary gear modules on parallel shafts for a total of 6 forward ratios. The system is modular and four, five, six or more speeds versions can be engineered to suit a particular cost and application requirement.

Infinitely Variable Transmission by Torotrak

ivtThe IVT changes ratios by adjusting where a set of rollers makes contact with two parallel bowl-like plates – one connects to the engine (input plate) while the other connects to the wheels (output plate).

If the rollers contact the input plate on its inner radius and the output plate on its outermost radius, it creates a low gear ratio suitable for standstill starts. As the rotors swivel towards the outside of the input plate and the inside of the output plate, slowly moves towards creating a high-gear ratio for cruising. A special traction fluid ensures the rollers grip the plates strongly.

The problem with CVT is that has an infinite number of ratios between the lowest gear and the highest gear, but the highest gear is often not as “overdrive” as we would like it to be, which means cruising speeds in the highest gear can result in a relatively higher engine RPM than say, an auto transmission with dual overdrives.

The IVT does not have this problem as it has very high overdrives – 120km/h at 1,000rpm was achieved. It also does not need a torque converter or CVT lock-up clutch to start from a standstill.

Zeroshift by Zeroshift Ltd, England

This particular technology is mechanically similiar to a manual transmission, however it doesn’t use a synchromesh. Instead, it’s aim is to change gears without interrupting torque to the driving wheels. It uses two “bullets” to engage and disengage gears. One is called the drive bullet and the other is called the overdrive bullet. When a gear is engaged, both bullets are holding the gear. When a gear change is requested, the overdrive bullet moves to engage the dog teeth on the next gear, while the drive bullet still holds the first gear thanks to a retention angle.

zeroshiftThe problem with this system is during the instant transition between the two gears, the engine, flywheel, and clutch will be spinning at a higher speed than the drive shaft, resulting in a large amount of inertia that must be relieved abruptly. To get around this, the system also precisely coordinates clutch pressure to absorb the inertia differentials.

Zeroshift Ltd says cost-wise, Zeroshift is cheaper to manufacture than a CVT or dual clutch transmission.

Have a look at a video from Zeroshift after the jump, showing the differences between a car equipped with Zeroshift and the other without.

The video clips below were filmed during back to back testing between two identical vehicles. One with a standard manual synchromesh (yellow) and the other equipped with a Zeroshift transmission (green). Both start from a standstill and accelerate. Gear shifts occur simultaneously and are indicated with a count down.

Video: Zeroshift – Internal Comparison

Video: Zeroshift – External Comparison

Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.

10% discount when you renew your car insurance

Compare prices between different insurer providers and use the promo code 'PAULTAN10' when you make your payment to save the most on your car insurance renewal compared to other competing services.

Car Insurance

Paul Tan

After dabbling for years in the IT industry, Paul Tan initially began this site as a general blog covering various topics of personal interest. With an increasing number of readers paying rapt attention to the motoring stories, one thing led to another and the rest, as they say, is history.

 

Comments

  • nizam80 (Member) on Jul 12, 2007 at 3:03 pm

    Interesting article. Paul, I've read your article regarding Proton's CPS in the New Straits Times yesterday (11/7)…. nice article!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • sxe10r (Member) on Jul 12, 2007 at 4:33 pm

    dual final drive ?? … means gear ration 1:2 = 1:4 ?? any video how the this IVT works ?? i only know CVT ….. this will increase speed , torque & save fuel ???

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • LittleFire85 (Member) on Jul 12, 2007 at 6:10 pm

    Wow this is good, we got more better and faster gear transmission.. but even u post this, i dont think P1 will ever use this in his production.. Mainly coz, expensive, need pay royalty bla bla bla.. So dream on.. Only Europeans, Americans n japanese who have the guts to try.. while we always follow their back..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • transformer (Member) on Jul 12, 2007 at 8:08 pm

    hopes it improve FC !

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • proton.GL. (Member) on Jul 13, 2007 at 12:07 am

    cvt

    -no rythm- (bored)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • mystvearn (Member) on Jul 13, 2007 at 4:56 am

    nice article, good job

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • szw (Member) on Jul 13, 2007 at 5:32 am

    what are they comparing ?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • exodust (Member) on Jul 13, 2007 at 6:20 pm

    Simply unbelieveable.. I can't believe that even in a post like this would someone think of mentioning Proton. Seriously, the rest of us are not retarded, we know it'll be ages before Proton uses any of these transmissions; we don't need someone to bring it up.

    Back to the post, I've only previously heard of the Antonov transmission and I never understood why it isnt more commonly applied. The rest sound like good alternatives to the usual transmissions too

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • proton.GL. (Member) on Jul 13, 2007 at 11:22 pm

    well we can always talk about new invention, different tech,-and its good,

    rotary engine, miller cycle, self ignited petrol engine, hybrid, innovative gearbox

    but actually car is not much evolves, from its starts,

    4 wheel 4 stroke engine, syncromesh gearbox, and proven its relability,

    we alway welcome technologies as they are brilliant but, sometimes what matters is cost and maitainability,

    i never opposed to technology,

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
 

Add a comment

required

required