2009 Hyundai Sonata Transform facelift
Here are more official details on the car Hyundai has decided to call the Hyundai Sonata Transform, basically the mid-life facelift of the latest fourth generation Hyundai Sonata. The new Sonata facelift will be launched first in the Korean market for the 2008 model year, and the rest of the world will get it soonest for the 2009 model year, this probably includes Malaysia as well, pending our local distributor’s plans of course.
I like the current Sonata’s design and I say Hyundai has taken the new Sonata facelift backward in terms of exterior design - for example, the headlamps are now bigger so they look less sleek. But the new interior is a total redesign and looks much more upmarket than the current interior - a huge improvement to me, but very obviously “inspired” by the second generation Lexus RX/Toyota Harrier interior.
In Korea, the 2.0 liter Sonata gets its power boosted up to 163 PS but internationally the new engine specs is announced as having 158 PS. This probably has to do with different tune-ups for different countries having different emissions laws. The new 2.4 liter puts out 171 PS (179 PS in Korea), up from 161 PS. This power gain is achieved through the addition of a new variable intake system to the Theta engine family, and variable valve timing is now on both intake and exhaust ports.
More images and videos of the facelifted Sonata Transform after the jump.
Source
Video: 2009 Hyundai Sonata Transform facelift
Video: The Making Of Hyundai Sonata Transform Ad
Video: 2009 Hyundai Sonata Facelift
November 18, 2007 @ 8:49 am
wow…very nice interior.
November 18, 2007 @ 9:06 am
The front grill and lamp is a little bit too big for my liking. It adds on the Uncle-ish look now. They should just maintain it, why mess with something that is already good? The interior and the engine upgrade is really impressive. I wonder how soon can we get this on our roads. And not forgetting the less spec features plus “added” ah beng accessories all over the car.
November 18, 2007 @ 9:35 am
The headlamps suddenly look like EVO 7… dont u felt like it? LOL~! But is ok to me, at least they done more better job then our local automobile manufacturer…
November 18, 2007 @ 9:35 am
Good job Hyundai!
November 18, 2007 @ 10:19 am
Paul…great to hear tat they improve the already improved sonata… btw, do u have any info about the newly launchded accent?? looks kinda promissing… hope u will post one soon..
November 18, 2007 @ 11:21 am
Nice transformation video, asian transformer?? WEE!!
November 18, 2007 @ 11:57 am
hahah..nice one hyundai..
November 18, 2007 @ 12:07 pm
my brother and i always like to think the sonata as a brainstorm of both the new camry and accord. we call it “camcord” (copyright reserved! lol)
November 18, 2007 @ 12:48 pm
The gear knob suck!
November 18, 2007 @ 12:50 pm
Paul, how about FC?
November 18, 2007 @ 1:08 pm
@jasonlow
We already have the “new accent”. Its called the Kia Rio. Both run the same platform. Same interior, just different exterior panels.
November 18, 2007 @ 1:26 pm
Thirsty. Expensive to service. Poor residuals. Hate Hyundai. Plus where did they re-launch this car? Cloud? a big freezer? or is it on fire?
November 18, 2007 @ 1:46 pm
Let me rebuttal all of your claims.
I’m driving a Sonata NF 2.4L.
DrA said,
November 18, 2007 @ 1:26 pm
Thirsty. ( I’m getting 6.8L/100KM on highway. 10L~10.7L/100KM city drive MRR2, KL town, Subang USJ. )
Expensive to service. ( RM112.80 Semi-Synthetic Engine Oil Package @ Glenmarie Hyundai Hyumal SC.)
Poor residuals. ( You don’t make money from car. )
Hate Hyundai. ( Do try to update yourself. Don’t trap inside the old Hyundai.)
November 18, 2007 @ 3:26 pm
Now that Paul’s mentioned it, the headlights does look bigger.
And somehow I’m reminded of a VW Passat when I view the front.
Luckily there were no drastic cosmetic changes, so the exterior still looks elegant (despite being less sleek).
The interior definitely looks the part.
Very nice.
November 18, 2007 @ 4:47 pm
lame
November 18, 2007 @ 5:00 pm
blackberrybloke, this NF Sonata came out before the new Camry. It is our local suppliers take nearly 2 years after launch to bring it in, so you can’t say they copied the front of the new camry.
I believe Hyundai is now getting better with their engines. Previously their engines have gotten some help from Mitsubishi. Now their very own new CVVT engines are proven to be more fuel efficient.
November 18, 2007 @ 6:07 pm
Love the interior, with that engine, it’s still a family car…not for race…just some number gimmick to attract digit centric buyers
i dnt mind own 1 of them since they r cheap also
November 18, 2007 @ 6:09 pm
Hmm this interior remind me of kia’s new optima, not bad either
November 18, 2007 @ 8:19 pm
hahahahhaa.. hyundai used a mercedes to shoot the ad… hahahahhahaa
November 18, 2007 @ 8:31 pm
sorry BrakeFader. no offence. that is what i heard from the toyota assembly line rep (my mother supplies some of materials needed for the locally assembled units in their shah alam factory). apparently the blue prints for camry was out for quite some time even before sonata’s. i might be wrong
November 18, 2007 @ 10:08 pm
nicely done, much improved on the interior and the fact that they actually tried to improve their engines on a “facelift” is a good positive too.
it’s rare to see carmakers care about anything apart from the exterior in a facelift, so thumbs up for hyundai on that.
paul u gonna do a story on the new accent soon? they’ve just launched it and the 1.6 version with CVVT costing 73k looks interestingly good value, kinda curious about it…
November 18, 2007 @ 10:11 pm
love this ad… seen it from an american blog recently… the koreans have certainly upped their game
btw, sweetsorrow.mp3? hahahaha
ps: d gurl is cute~
November 19, 2007 @ 1:00 am
Same old price?
November 19, 2007 @ 1:05 am
DrA said,
November 18, 2007 @ 1:26 pm
Thirsty. Expensive to service. Poor residuals. Hate Hyundai
__________________
i believe you are referring to all hyundai cars.
you must be still living in the 90s. My hyundai getz 1.4 can travel much further than my brother’s lighter vios in a single tank of petrol averaging about 500km on mix 50-50 city/highway driving.
most new hyundais are equipped with FC meter to show you if it really is thirsty or not.
November 19, 2007 @ 1:09 am
the meter display looks like from odyssey though
November 19, 2007 @ 1:14 am
The new exterior has the older look than the current one, but interior is so nice and the new improved engine has good output, I still hope they will maintain the younger exterior look…
November 19, 2007 @ 1:36 am
this is the best interior makeover…other manufacturer shud follow. And as usual korean love to ruin the already good lookin exterior
November 19, 2007 @ 11:54 am
nmh, that’s very stereotypical of you.
Have you seen the Kyron’s facelift? Did they ruin it? Nope, I don’t think so.
November 19, 2007 @ 12:58 pm
Charger said,
November 19, 2007 @ 11:54 am
nmh, that’s very stereotypical of you.
Have you seen the Kyron’s facelift? Did they ruin it? Nope, I don’t think so.
___________________________________
but they’ve certainly ruined the Rexton’s facelift.
November 19, 2007 @ 9:20 pm
not bad…hyundai cars starting to impress me…starting with the new accent and then now the sonata…
November 19, 2007 @ 10:38 pm
the headlamp looks like nissan cefiro. i prefer the prior facelifted one..hehe!!!
interior is very nice..almost copy all good things from harrier.
November 19, 2007 @ 10:44 pm
King,
Not a good comparison. Getz 1.4 - small car, VIOS 1.5 - saloon.
Getz fuel tank 45L, VIOS 40L.
November 20, 2007 @ 12:47 am
sorry OT but DrA,
vios tank is 42L but the old model weights about 100kg less than the getz. car category has got nearly nothing to do with FC ( unless you are referring to Cd….but the effect is almost negligible since both cars Cd not much of difference ). FC more related to weight though.
anyway, back to topic. they “transformed” and improved the interior and engine so much but the exterior design does indeed seem a step backward……looks like the current facelifted elantra (front view). If only they left the front design untouched or do only minor changes then it would have been a perfect job.
November 20, 2007 @ 2:25 am
But Getz engine is 1.4 and vios is 1.5 i.e bigger engine.
Anyway.
IsaacVky,
RM112 for service? Even proton costs more than that to service. Is it a DIY or is it a promotional thing. What happen after that? Unless you are super rich, I’m sure you bought yours on hire purchase, minimum 4 yrs payment. Is the plan going to cover all these yrs for servicing. I know we don’t make money from cars, but we would prefer a car with strong residuals don’t we? Say, at 3 yrs the servicing plan ran out and you want to change your car. You would be thinking about residuals won’t you?
November 20, 2007 @ 2:28 am
Wahh !! nice new interior
Wahh!! 11.5km/L . 2000cc…fuel saving huh!!
November 20, 2007 @ 11:19 am
huh???
its look like em…..
no one the same…..
more ‘orang tua’ looking la……..
bulky front grille…………..
previous one is better……….
wood grain garnish on steering and dashboard?????
and gear stick???………..look dull dude…..
BETTER PUT THE SILVER THAN ODD LOOKING FAKE WOOD
November 20, 2007 @ 11:35 am
DrA said,
November 20, 2007 @ 2:25 am
But Getz engine is 1.4 and vios is 1.5 i.e bigger engine
___
C’mon la, the vios is slightly bigger engine pulling a lighter body. you are trying to say the vios is good in FC ? At this weight and engine size the power to weight ratio is just borderline( more advantage to vios), therefore a slightly bigger/more poerful engine will improve FC. eg: gen2 1.6 is more fuel efficient than 1.3 and myvi 1.3 better FC than 1.0.
I doubt that u r a doctor at all…ppl like you just like to listen to wat the toyota salesman say without checking out facts 1st.
talking bout residuals…..go get a house then. prefer a car with strong residuals? go get a kancil. or a second hand kancil. no car above 2.0 liter class has strong residuals.
November 20, 2007 @ 1:50 pm
King got it right.
With the 2nd hard car market so bad, nothign with a big engine gets good residuals.
Even the 2.0 Accord looses nearly 10k per year. Or why not the perenial favourite, the Alfa and Volvo, both looses about 20-30k per year (and that is average, dep for first 3 years is even higher). Even BMWs are getting hit.
Hyundai’s depreciation is high for the first 3 years (due to close pricing with proton), after of which it flattens out.
November 20, 2007 @ 4:06 pm
DrA said,
November 20, 2007 @ 2:25 am
http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m232/IsaacVky/Image027-2.jpg
http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m232/IsaacVky/Image021-7.jpg
RM112.80
Honda Civic 8th 2.0 depreciate 20k for the 1st year.
My family’s Accord 2.4 04 only worth RM100k after these years.
Don’t buy any car if you’re so scared to loss money.
Proton Tiara might suit you because 2nd hand value is only a few thousand ringgit and let’s say you get rid of it after a few months, it still worth few thousand :p
I don’t get any servicing plan like the Honda’s when I purchased the Sonata NF. And I don’t get it why must I sell the car after the servicing plan. I can afford the service. It’s cheap also. I have experiences with UMW Toyota SC, Hyumal Hyundai SC & EON Mitsubishi SC and I found that Hyundai is one of the fastest and cheapest to service. Jalan 217 Toyota SC made me waited 5 bloody hours for the car to be ready with appointment made few days before I went. Bloody UMW.
November 20, 2007 @ 4:33 pm
GOOD from FAR but FAR from GOOD!
November 20, 2007 @ 4:54 pm
if u want to count depreciation, do it in percentage terms….its weird to see that ppl are comparing ringgit wise….its obvious that bigger cars will suffer more in that sense. average for depreciation is around 10% of its market value…so its no surprise to see accord losing 10k a year and volvos 20k or more….
referring to the model year of 2009….means when will be launched? 2008?
its confusing when they state that its 2009 and it appears the year before.
November 20, 2007 @ 8:48 pm
agreed with IsaacVky,
Don’t buy any car if you’re so scared to loss money ( KIASU )
November 20, 2007 @ 8:48 pm
oops…lose money
November 21, 2007 @ 11:06 am
frontal view like waja…so oldies.