The new national car project (NNCP) has been a big talking point since prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad mooted it in June, and Astro Awani reports that the he is standing firm behind his brainchild.
At a press conference during the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting in Papua New Guinea on Saturday, the premier claimed that the automotive industry will be the driving force behind other sectors of the economy, particularly engineering. “A car is a kind of catalyst for other things. If you want to learn manufacturing of certain products, engineering-wise, you have to start with a car,” he said.
Mahathir added that Malaysia’s past national car projects have allowed it to develop new skills that it would not have obtained otherwise. “To make a car, you have to make 4,000 different components and then put them together. It’s not easy, but we have mastered it in a very short time. Now we can design, produce the prototypes, test, do the clay models, everything. Even the engines, we can produce ourselves.
“Nowadays when you design a car, you don’t draw on a piece of paper. You use technology to design, look around, look inside, see every angle, place it before a building to see how it looks like,” he said. “Today, our people can design those things. If we didn’t have a motor car project, I doubt whether we could have mastered all the new technologies with regard to design.”
The new national car is due to enter production in 2020, with a prototype expected to be ready by early next year. The Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) has recently said that it has received over 20 proposals from the private sector for the project, which finance minister Lim Guan Eng said will not use public funds.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments express skepticism and criticism towards the third national car project, questioning its viability and past successes of Proton. Many argue that Malaysia's high car prices, lack of competitiveness, and protectionist policies have hindered growth in the automotive industry. Some suggest diversifying beyond automotive manufacturing into fields like technology, green mobility, or other industries. Several commenters believe the project may mainly serve government jobs or cronies rather than benefiting consumers or economic development. Others highlight issues like public transport deficiencies, high costs, and corruption. Overall, sentiments are largely negative, with frustrations over past government projects, high costs, and doubts about the country's ability to compete globally, suggesting a need to rethink strategies for economic growth and industrial diversification.