GWM Ora Good Cat vs Neta Neta V
Verdict
The GWM Ora Good Cat asks RM109,800 against RM100,000 for the Neta Neta V, and the RM9,800 gap buys a much stronger 143 hp motor, a higher 150 km/h top speed, six airbags and AEB. Its 57.7 kWh battery only returns 20 km more range than the Neta’s 38.5 kWh pack, though, so this is not a range walkover. The Neta fights back with a larger 335-litre boot and lower RM50 road tax. For Malaysian buyers, the Good Cat is the safer, faster pick; the Neta is the cheaper, more practical boot-first EV.
Pick the GWM Ora Good Cat if you want stronger performance, six airbags and AEB, and can live with the smaller 250-litre boot.
Pick the Neta Neta V if you want the lower entry price, a larger 335-litre boot and can accept 94 hp with two airbags.
Key differences
- Price: GWM Ora Good Cat RM109,800; Neta Neta V RM100,000
- Power and top speed: GWM Ora Good Cat 143 hp and 150 km/h; Neta Neta V 94 hp and 120 km/h
- Battery and range: GWM Ora Good Cat 57.7 kWh and 400 km; Neta Neta V 38.5 kWh and 380 km
- Size: GWM Ora Good Cat 4,235 mm long, 1,825 mm wide; Neta Neta V 4,070 mm long, 1,690 mm wide
- Wheelbase: GWM Ora Good Cat 2,650 mm; Neta Neta V 2,420 mm
- Boot and safety: GWM Ora Good Cat 250 litres, six airbags and AEB; Neta Neta V 335 litres, two airbags and no AEB listed
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM 109,800 | RM 100,000✓ |
| Body type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | B-Segment | B-Segment |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Assembly | CBU | CBU |
| Powertrain | ||
| Fuel | Electric | Electric |
| Motor | Single motor | Single motor |
| Power | 143 hp✓ | 94 hp |
| Transmission | Single Ratio Automatic | Single Ratio Automatic |
| Driven wheels | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Performance | ||
| Top speed | 150 km/h✓ | 120 km/h |
| Efficiency | ||
| Battery | 57.7 kWh✓ | 38.5 kWh |
| EV range | 400 km✓ | 380 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,235 mm | 4,070 mm |
| Width | 1,825 mm | 1,690 mm |
| Height | 1,596 mm | 1,540 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,650 mm | 2,420 mm |
| Boot space | 250 L | 335 L✓ |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 6✓ | 2 |
| Auto emergency braking | Yes | — |
| Ownership | ||
| Warranty | 5 | 5 |
| Road tax / year | RM 80 | RM 50✓ |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
Ora Good Cat
- 143 hp gives it a clear power advantage
- Six airbags and AEB are important safety wins
- Longer 2,650 mm wheelbase and wider body
- Smaller 250-litre boot
- Costs RM9,800 more
- Bigger battery gives only 20 km more listed range
Neta V
- Lower RM100,000 price
- Larger 335-litre boot
- Lower RM50 annual road tax
- Only 94 hp and 120 km/h top speed
- Two airbags only
- No AEB listed
Ora Good Cat vs Neta V FAQ
Is the GWM Ora Good Cat or Neta Neta V better?
The GWM Ora Good Cat is better if safety and performance matter: it has 143 hp, six airbags and AEB. The Neta Neta V is better for boot space and cost, with 335 litres and a RM100,000 price.
What is the price difference?
The GWM Ora Good Cat costs RM109,800, while the Neta Neta V costs RM100,000. That makes the Good Cat RM9,800 more expensive.
Which EV has the longer range?
The GWM Ora Good Cat has the longer listed range at 400 km, but the Neta Neta V is close at 380 km. The gap is only 20 km despite the Good Cat having a much larger 57.7 kWh battery.