Chery Tiggo Cross vs Perodua QV-E
Verdict
The Tiggo Cross is priced at RM 88,800, offering a 1.5-litre petrol engine with 145 hp and 210 Nm of torque, making it a solid choice for those who prefer traditional fuel options. In contrast, the QV-E, at RM 80,000, boasts an electric powertrain delivering 201 hp and a 0-100 km/h time of just 7.5 seconds, appealing to buyers seeking performance and eco-friendliness. With an EV range of 370 km, the QV-E is ideal for urban commuting, while the Tiggo Cross provides a larger boot space of 380 L for families.
Pick the Tiggo Cross if you prefer a petrol engine and more boot space.
Pick the QV-E if you want a powerful electric vehicle with a swift acceleration.
Key differences
- Price: RM 88,800 (Tiggo Cross) vs RM 80,000 (QV-E)
- Power: 145 hp (Tiggo Cross) vs 201 hp (QV-E)
- 0-100 km/h: Not available (Tiggo Cross) vs 7.5 s (QV-E)
- Boot space: 380 L (Tiggo Cross) vs 320 L (QV-E)
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM 88,800 | RM 80,000✓ |
| Body type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | B-Segment | B-Segment |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Assembly | CBU | CKD |
| Powertrain | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Electric |
| Engine | 1,498 cc | Electric |
| Power | 145 hp | 201 hp✓ |
| Torque | 210 Nm | — |
| Transmission | Dual-clutch Automatic (Wet) | Single Ratio Automatic |
| Driven wheels | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | — | 7.5 s |
| Top speed | — | 165 km/h |
| Efficiency | ||
| Battery | — | 52.5 kWh |
| EV range | — | 370 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,318 mm | 4,170 mm |
| Width | 1,830 mm | 1,800 mm |
| Height | 1,670 mm | 1,502 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,610 mm | 2,680 mm |
| Boot space | 380 L✓ | 320 L |
| Fuel tank | 51 L | — |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 6 | 6 |
| Auto emergency braking | Yes | Yes |
| Ownership | ||
| Warranty | 7✓ | 6 |
| Road tax / year | RM 120✓ | RM 160 |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
Tiggo Cross
- More boot space for family use
- Lower price point
- Petrol engine offers familiar refuelling convenience
- Less power compared to the QV-E
- No electric range benefits
- Longer 0-100 km/h time unknown
QV-E
- Higher power output for better performance
- Electric range of 370 km for daily use
- Faster acceleration enhances driving experience
- Smaller boot space limits cargo capacity
- Higher annual road tax at RM 160
- Electric charging infrastructure may be a concern
Tiggo Cross vs QV-E FAQ
Is the Tiggo Cross or QV-E better?
It depends on your preference for petrol versus electric; the Tiggo Cross is better for traditional fuel users, while the QV-E excels in performance and eco-friendliness.
What is the price difference?
The Tiggo Cross is priced at RM 88,800, while the QV-E is more affordable at RM 80,000, making the latter a better option for budget-conscious buyers.
What is the warranty period for both models?
The Tiggo Cross comes with a 7-year warranty, while the QV-E offers a slightly shorter 6-year warranty.