Honda WR-V vs Nissan NV200
Verdict
For Malaysian buyers, the Honda WR-V offers a compelling package with a price of RM 89,900, a powerful 121 hp engine, and impressive fuel economy of 6.0 L/100km, making it a strong contender in the B-segment SUV market. In contrast, the Nissan NV200, priced at RM 79,800, provides significantly more cargo space with 4,200 L, appealing to those prioritising practicality over passenger capacity.
Pick the Honda WR-V if you seek a stylish SUV with better performance and advanced safety features.
Pick the Nissan NV200 if you need a spacious commercial vehicle for transporting goods.
Key differences
- Price: RM 89,900 (WR-V) vs RM 79,800 (NV200)
- Power: 121 hp (WR-V) vs 108 hp (NV200)
- Boot space: 380 L (WR-V) vs 4,200 L (NV200)
- Fuel economy: 6.0 L/100km (WR-V) vs 7.1 L/100km (NV200)
- Seats: 5 (WR-V) vs 2 (NV200)
- Warranty: 5 years (WR-V) vs 3 years (NV200)
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM 89,900 | RM 79,800✓ |
| Body type | SUV | Commercial |
| Segment | B-Segment | Commercial |
| Seats | 5 | 2 |
| Assembly | CKD | CKD |
| Powertrain | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,498 cc | 1,598 cc |
| Power | 121 hp✓ | 108 hp |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 152 Nm✓ |
| Transmission | CVT Automatic | Manual |
| Driven wheels | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 11.0 s | — |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | — |
| Efficiency | ||
| Fuel economy | 6.0 L/100km✓ | 7.1 L/100km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,060 mm | 4,400 mm |
| Width | 1,780 mm | 1,695 mm |
| Height | 1,576 mm | 1,855 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,485 mm | 2,725 mm |
| Boot space | 380 L | 4,200 L✓ |
| Fuel tank | 40 L | 55 L |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 4✓ | 2 |
| Auto emergency braking | Yes | — |
| Ownership | ||
| Warranty | 5✓ | 3 |
| Road tax / year | RM 120 | RM 120 |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
WR-V
- Stylish design and modern features
- Better fuel efficiency
- Advanced safety with auto emergency braking
- Higher price compared to NV200
- Less cargo space than NV200
NV200
- Significantly larger cargo capacity
- Lower price point
- Robust build for commercial use
- Fewer passenger seats
- Less powerful engine compared to WR-V
WR-V vs NV200 FAQ
Is the Honda WR-V or Nissan NV200 better?
The Honda WR-V is better for those seeking a stylish and efficient SUV, while the Nissan NV200 excels in cargo capacity and commercial utility.
What is the price difference?
The Honda WR-V is priced at RM 89,900, while the Nissan NV200 is more affordable at RM 79,800, making the NV200 RM 10,100 cheaper.
How does the fuel economy compare?
The Honda WR-V offers better fuel economy at 6.0 L/100km compared to the Nissan NV200's 7.1 L/100km.