Honda WR-V vs Proton X50
Verdict
For Malaysian buyers, the Honda WR-V is priced at RM 89,900, slightly higher than the Proton X50 at RM 89,800, making it a competitive option in the B-segment SUV market. While the WR-V offers a respectable 121 hp and 145 Nm of torque, the X50 significantly outshines it with 178 hp and 290 Nm, translating to a much quicker 0-100 km/h time of 7.6 seconds compared to the WR-V's 11.0 seconds. Additionally, the WR-V boasts a larger boot space of 380 litres, making it a practical choice for families.
Pick the WR-V if you prioritise boot space and safety features like auto emergency braking.
Pick the X50 if you desire superior performance and a sportier driving experience.
Key differences
- Power: 121 hp (WR-V) vs 178 hp (X50)
- Torque: 145 Nm (WR-V) vs 290 Nm (X50)
- 0-100 km/h: 11.0 s (WR-V) vs 7.6 s (X50)
- Boot space: 380 L (WR-V) vs 330 L (X50)
- Airbags: 4 (WR-V) vs 6 (X50)
- Fuel tank: 40 L (WR-V) vs 45 L (X50)
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM 89,900 | RM 89,800✓ |
| Body type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | B-Segment | B-Segment |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Assembly | CKD | CKD |
| Powertrain | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,498 cc | 1,499 cc |
| Power | 121 hp | 178 hp✓ |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 290 Nm✓ |
| Transmission | CVT Automatic | Dual-clutch Automatic (Wet) |
| Driven wheels | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 11.0 s | 7.6 s✓ |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | — |
| Efficiency | ||
| Fuel economy | 6.0 L/100km | — |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,060 mm | 4,380 mm |
| Width | 1,780 mm | 1,795 mm |
| Height | 1,576 mm | 1,609 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,485 mm | 2,600 mm |
| Boot space | 380 L✓ | 330 L |
| Fuel tank | 40 L | 45 L |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 4 | 6✓ |
| Auto emergency braking | Yes | — |
| Ownership | ||
| Warranty | 5 | 5 |
| Road tax / year | RM 120 | RM 120 |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
WR-V
- Spacious boot at 380 L
- Auto emergency braking included
- Good fuel economy at 6.0 L/100km
- Less powerful engine with 121 hp
- Slower acceleration at 11.0 s
- Fewer airbags than X50
X50
- Powerful engine with 178 hp
- Faster 0-100 km/h in 7.6 s
- More airbags for enhanced safety
- Slightly smaller boot at 330 L
- No auto emergency braking feature
- Higher fuel consumption not specified
WR-V vs X50 FAQ
Is the WR-V or X50 better?
The choice depends on your priorities; the WR-V excels in practicality and safety, while the X50 offers superior performance.
What is the price difference?
The WR-V is priced at RM 89,900, while the X50 is slightly cheaper at RM 89,800.
How do their fuel economies compare?
The WR-V has a fuel economy of 6.0 L/100km, while the X50's fuel economy is not specified.