Honda WR-V vs Seres 3
Verdict
For Malaysian buyers, the Honda WR-V offers a competitive price of RM 89,900, making it an attractive option in the B-segment SUV market. With a fuel economy of 6.0 L/100km and a respectable power output of 121 hp, it balances efficiency and performance. However, for those prioritising electric mobility, the BYD 3’s 340 km EV range and superior 161 hp power output make it a compelling choice, albeit at a higher price of RM 95,000.
Pick the WR-V if you prefer a petrol SUV with a lower price and good fuel economy.
Pick the 3 if you want an electric SUV with superior power and range.
Key differences
- Price: WR-V RM 89,900 | 3 RM 95,000
- Power: WR-V 121 hp | 3 161 hp
- Fuel economy: WR-V 6.0 L/100km | 3 —
- Boot space: WR-V 380 L | 3 525 L
- Battery: WR-V — | 3 53.6 kWh
- EV range: WR-V — | 3 340 km
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM 89,900✓ | RM 95,000 |
| Body type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | B-Segment | B-Segment |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Assembly | CKD | CBU |
| Powertrain | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Electric |
| Engine | 1,498 cc | Electric |
| Power | 121 hp | 161 hp✓ |
| Torque | 145 Nm | — |
| Transmission | CVT Automatic | Single Ratio Automatic |
| Driven wheels | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 11.0 s | — |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | — |
| Efficiency | ||
| Fuel economy | 6.0 L/100km | — |
| Battery | — | 53.6 kWh |
| EV range | — | 340 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,060 mm | 4,385 mm |
| Width | 1,780 mm | 1,850 mm |
| Height | 1,576 mm | 1,650 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,485 mm | 2,655 mm |
| Boot space | 380 L | 525 L✓ |
| Fuel tank | 40 L | — |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 4 | 6✓ |
| Auto emergency braking | Yes | — |
| Ownership | ||
| Warranty | 5 | — |
| Road tax / year | RM 120 | RM 120 |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
WR-V
- Affordable entry price
- Good fuel efficiency
- Decent power for city driving
- Lower power compared to rivals
- Less boot space than the 3
- Limited features compared to electric options
3
- Strong electric performance
- Long EV range of 340 km
- More spacious boot at 525 L
- Higher price point
- Limited charging infrastructure
- Less familiarity with electric maintenance
WR-V vs 3 FAQ
Is the WR-V or 3 better?
It depends on your preference for petrol versus electric; the WR-V is budget-friendly while the 3 offers superior performance and range.
What is the price difference?
The WR-V is priced at RM 89,900, while the 3 costs RM 95,000, making the WR-V RM 5,100 cheaper.
How does the performance compare?
The WR-V delivers 121 hp and 145 Nm of torque, while the 3 boasts 161 hp, providing a more powerful driving experience.