Perodua Ativa vs Wuling Bingo
Verdict
At RM62,500, the Perodua Ativa is RM5,300 cheaper than the RM67,800 Wuling Bingo, and it suits buyers who still want petrol convenience, five seats and AEB. The Bingo counters as a pure EV with a 31.9 kWh battery, 273 km range, 395-litre boot and a longer 2,560 mm wheelbase despite being shorter. The Ativa has more power at 97 hp versus 67 hp and a taller SUV body. This is not a simple size win: one is the more practical family fit, the other the urban EV play.
Pick the Perodua Ativa if you need five seats, petrol refuelling and a lower purchase price.
Pick the Wuling Bingo if you can live with four seats and want an EV with 273 km of range and a bigger boot.
Key differences
- Price: Perodua Ativa RM62,500; Wuling Bingo RM67,800
- Power: Perodua Ativa 97 hp; Wuling Bingo 67 hp
- Seating: Perodua Ativa 5 seats; Wuling Bingo 4 seats
- Boot space: Perodua Ativa 369 litres; Wuling Bingo 395 litres
- Wheelbase: Perodua Ativa 2,525 mm; Wuling Bingo 2,560 mm
- Energy use: Perodua Ativa petrol at 5.3 L/100 km; Wuling Bingo electric with 273 km range
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM 62,500✓ | RM 67,800 |
| Body type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Segment | B-Segment | B-Segment |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Assembly | CKD | CKD |
| Powertrain | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Electric |
| Engine | 996 cc | Single motor |
| Power | 97 hp✓ | 67 hp |
| Torque | 140 Nm | — |
| Transmission | CVT Automatic | Single Ratio Automatic |
| Driven wheels | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Efficiency | ||
| Fuel economy | 5.3 L/100km | — |
| Battery | — | 31.9 kWh |
| EV range | — | 273 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,065 mm | 3,950 mm |
| Width | 1,710 mm | 1,708 mm |
| Height | 1,635 mm | 1,580 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,525 mm | 2,560 mm |
| Boot space | 369 L | 395 L✓ |
| Fuel tank | 36 L | — |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 6 | 6 |
| Auto emergency braking | Yes | — |
| Ownership | ||
| Warranty | 5 | 5 |
| Road tax / year | RM 20 | RM 20 |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
Ativa
- Cheaper by RM5,300
- Five seats instead of four
- AEB is listed
- Smaller 369-litre boot
- Shorter 2,525 mm wheelbase
- No EV range or battery
Bingo
- 273 km EV range
- Larger 395-litre boot
- Longer 2,560 mm wheelbase
- Only four seats
- Lower 67 hp output
- AEB not listed
Ativa vs Bingo FAQ
Is the Perodua Ativa or Wuling Bingo better?
For most small-family use, the Perodua Ativa is the safer pick on paper: it has five seats, 97 hp and AEB listed. The Wuling Bingo makes more sense if you specifically want electric driving and can accept four seats.
What is the price difference?
The Perodua Ativa costs RM5,300 less than the Wuling Bingo. The gap is RM62,500 versus RM67,800.
Which has more boot space?
The Wuling Bingo has the bigger boot at 395 litres, compared with 369 litres in the Perodua Ativa. That is a 26-litre advantage for the EV hatchback.