Perodua Aruz vs Wuling Bingo
Verdict
This is less about B-segment labels than use case. The RM72,900 Perodua Aruz is 485 mm longer, has seven seats, a 1.5-litre petrol engine with 101 hp and a 45-litre tank, so it suits family duty better. The RM67,800 Wuling Bingo is a four-seat EV hatch with a 31.9 kWh battery, 273 km range, 395-litre boot and RM20 road tax. But it has 67 hp, and there is no ASEAN NCAP result listed; the Aruz has a 5-star rating.
Pick the Perodua Aruz if you need seven seats, petrol range from a 45-litre tank and the reassurance of a 5-star ASEAN NCAP rating.
Pick the Wuling Bingo if you want a smaller EV hatch with 273 km range, a bigger 395-litre boot and RM20 annual road tax.
Key differences
- Price: Perodua Aruz RM72,900; Wuling Bingo RM67,800
- Seats: Perodua Aruz 7; Wuling Bingo 4
- Power: Perodua Aruz 101 hp; Wuling Bingo 67 hp
- Length: Perodua Aruz 4,435 mm; Wuling Bingo 3,950 mm
- Boot space: Perodua Aruz 213 L; Wuling Bingo 395 L
- Road tax: Perodua Aruz RM120/year; Wuling Bingo RM20/year
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM 72,900 | RM 67,800✓ |
| Body type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Segment | B-Segment | B-Segment |
| Seats | 7 | 4 |
| Assembly | CKD | CKD |
| Powertrain | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Electric |
| Engine | 1,496 cc | Single motor |
| Power | 101 hp✓ | 67 hp |
| Torque | 133 Nm | — |
| Transmission | Conventional Automatic | Single Ratio Automatic |
| Driven wheels | Rear Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Efficiency | ||
| Fuel economy | 6.4 L/100km | — |
| Battery | — | 31.9 kWh |
| EV range | — | 273 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,435 mm | 3,950 mm |
| Width | 1,695 mm | 1,708 mm |
| Height | 1,705 mm | 1,580 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,685 mm | 2,560 mm |
| Boot space | 213 L | 395 L✓ |
| Fuel tank | 45 L | — |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 6 | 6 |
| ASEAN NCAP | 5★ | — |
| Auto emergency braking | — | — |
| Ownership | ||
| Warranty | 5 | 5 |
| Road tax / year | RM 120 | RM 20✓ |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
Aruz
- Seven seats
- 101 hp petrol engine
- 5-star ASEAN NCAP with 6 airbags
- Smaller 213-litre boot
- RM120 annual road tax
- Uses 6.4 L/100 km petrol
Bingo
- 273 km EV range
- Larger 395-litre boot
- Lower RM20 annual road tax
- Only four seats
- 67 hp motor
- No ASEAN NCAP rating listed
Aruz vs Bingo FAQ
Is the Perodua Aruz or Wuling Bingo better?
For family use, the Perodua Aruz is the better fit with seven seats, 101 hp and a 5-star ASEAN NCAP rating. For city EV use, the Wuling Bingo answers with 273 km range, a 395-litre boot and lower road tax.
What is the price difference?
The Wuling Bingo costs RM67,800, while the Perodua Aruz costs RM72,900. That makes the Bingo RM5,100 cheaper.
Which has more luggage space?
The Wuling Bingo has the larger boot at 395 litres. The Perodua Aruz has 213 litres, but it counters with seven seats against the Bingo’s four.