Car Buyer's Guide

Perodua QV-E vs Wuling Bingo

Perodua QV-E

Perodua QV-E

Wuling Bingo

Wuling Bingo

Verdict

For a Malaysian buyer, the Perodua QV-E is the more rounded car: its 201 hp/285 Nm motor, 52.5 kWh battery and 370 km range put clear distance between it and the Wuling Bingo’s 67 hp/150 Nm, 31.9 kWh and 273 km. It also seats five and brings ASA 3.0 pre-collision braking, adaptive cruise control and a 360-degree camera. The Bingo answers with a 395-litre boot against 320 litres and RM20 annual road tax versus RM160. The QV-E’s RM215 monthly BaaS rental runs for nine years.

QV-E

Pick the Perodua QV-E if you need five seats, 370 km of range and substantially stronger performance with active safety aids.

Bingo

Pick the Wuling Bingo if a larger 395-litre boot, lower annual road tax and a lower upfront price matter more than performance and rear-seat capacity.

Key differences

  • Price: RM69,999 for the Perodua QV-E versus RM67,800 for the Wuling Bingo.
  • Motor output: 201 hp and 285 Nm versus 67 hp and 150 Nm.
  • Battery and range: 52.5 kWh and 370 km versus 31.9 kWh and 273 km.
  • Road tax: RM160 per year versus RM20 per year.
  • Seating and boot space: five seats and 320 litres versus four seats and 395 litres.
  • DC charging: 60 kW versus 50 kW.

QV-E

  • 201 hp and 285 Nm motor output.
  • 52.5 kWh battery with 370 km range.
  • Five seats, ASA 3.0 braking and a 360-degree camera.
  • RM2,199 higher sticker price, plus RM215 monthly BaaS rental for nine years.
  • 320-litre boot is 75 litres smaller.
  • RM160 annual road tax versus RM20.

Bingo

  • RM20 annual road tax.
  • 395-litre boot space.
  • 7 kW AC charging rate versus 6.6 kW.
  • 67 hp and 150 Nm versus 201 hp and 285 Nm.
  • 273 km range from a 31.9 kWh battery versus 370 km from 52.5 kWh.
  • Four seats rather than five, and no autonomous braking system.
Price & overview
PriceRM69,999RM67,800
Body typeSUVHatchback
SegmentB-SegmentB-Segment
AssemblyCKDCKD
Ownership
Road tax / yearRM160RM20
Powertrain
Engine Tech400V architecture400V architecture
FuelElectricElectric
Number of Motors11
Motor Horsepower201 hp67 hp
Motor Torque285 Nm150 Nm
Battery Capacity52.5 kWh31.9 kWh
EV Range370 km273 km
Charging Rate (AC)6.6 kW7 kW
Charging Rate (DC)60 kW50 kW
V2L3.3 kW
Drivetrain
TransmissionSingle Ratio AutomaticSingle Ratio Automatic
DrivelineFront Wheel DriveFront Wheel Drive
Performance & Efficiency
0-100 km/h7.5 seconds
Top Speed165 km/h
Dimensions
Length4,170 mm3,950 mm
Width1,800 mm1,708 mm
Height1,502 mm1,580 mm
Wheelbase2,680 mm2,560 mm
Weight1,600 kg
Doors55
Seats54
Boot Space320 litres395 litres
Front Tyre215/50R18185/60R15
Rear Tyre215/50R18185/60R15
Spare TyreN/A, Tyre Repair Kit
Factory TyresAtlas A3Linglong Green-Max HP
Chassis
AssemblyMalaysia (CKD)Malaysia (CKD)
Front SuspensionMacPherson StrutsMacPherson Struts
Rear SuspensionTorsion BeamTorsion Beam
Front Wheels18" Alloys15" Steel Wheels with Hubcaps
Rear Wheels18" Alloys15" Steel Wheels with Hubcaps
SteeringRack and Pinion (Electric Power Steering)Rack & Pinion (Electric Power Steering)
Chassis NotesRM215 a month for BaaS battery rental (inclusive of tax, and for nine years)
Safety
AirbagsDriver and Passenger, Front Side, Front and Rear CurtainDriver and Front Passenger, Front Side, Front & Rear Curtains
ABS/EBD
Stability Control
Alarm
Immobilizer
Airbag Disable Function
Child Safety LockManual for Rear DoorsManual for Rear Doors
Seat Belts5 Three-point4 Three-point
Blind Spot Info System
ISOFIXAvailable for two outer rear passenger seats.Available on Outer Two Rear Seats
Autonomous Braking SystemYes, ASA 3.0 Pre-collision Braking (4-120 km/h) with Pedestrian Detection
Lane-keeping AssistSteering CorrectionNo
Collision Warning
Seatbelt ReminderFor All SeatsFront Seats
Lighting
HeadlampsLED Projectors with LED Light BarLED Projectors
TaillampsFull LED with LED Light BarFull LED
LED Daytime Running Lights
Rear Foglamps
Wing Mirror Turn Indicators
Cabin
Front SeatsPowered Driver's Seat, Manual Passenger SeatPowered Driver's Seat, Manual Passenger Seat
Rear Seats60:40 Split-folding with Centre Armrest50:50 Split-folding
Front Air-conSingle-zone Automatic Climate ControlManual Air Conditioning
Power Sockets1 Front, 2 USB Front, 2 USB Rear1 USB Front
Interior LightingMap Lights and Ambient LightsMap Lights
Cup Holders2 Front, 2 Rear2 Front, 1 Rear
Audio10.25" Touchscreen with Android Auto, Apple CarPlay, Bluetooth and 6 Speakers10.25" Touchscreen with Wireless Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, 4-speaker Sound System
Convenience
Power WindowsFour Windows, Driver's Side Auto Up/DownFour Windows, Driver's Side Auto-down Function
Engine StartKeyless Push ButtonKeyless Operation (Depress Brake Pedal)
LocksKeyless OperationKeyless Operation
Auto Headlamps
Cruise ControlAdaptive Cruise Control with Stop and Go and Steering AssistPassive Cruise Control
Steering Audio Control
Steering Tilt
Steering Telescopic
Boot OperationRemote Control ActivationRemote Control Operation
Parking Sensor Front2 Sensors
Parking Sensor Rear2 Sensors2 Sensors
Reverse CameraYes, with 360-degree CameraYes
Folding Wing Mirrors
Bluetooth
Navigation
Hill Start Assist
Instrument ClusterFull LCD MonitorFull LCD Monitor
Parking BrakeElectronicElectronic
Warranty
Warranty Mileage Manufacturer150,000 km150,000 km
Warranty Manufacturer6 years5 years
Warranty Notes8-year/120,000 km Battery Warranty, 8-year/160,000 km Drive Motor Warranty

Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.

QV-E vs Bingo FAQ

Is the Perodua QV-E or Wuling Bingo better?

The Perodua QV-E is better for performance, range, five-seat practicality and driver assistance systems. The Wuling Bingo makes more sense only if its 395-litre boot, RM20 road tax and lower purchase price carry more weight than its 273 km range and four-seat layout.

What is the price difference?

The Perodua QV-E costs RM2,199 more than the Wuling Bingo. Its ownership calculation also needs to include the RM215 monthly BaaS battery rental, inclusive of tax, for nine years.

Which has the longer range and faster charging?

The QV-E goes farther at 370 km versus the Bingo’s 273 km, and its 60 kW DC rate beats the Bingo’s 50 kW. The Bingo is marginally quicker on AC charging at 7 kW versus 6.6 kW.

More comparisons

Buying one of these? Sell your old car, get paid in 24 hours