According to report by The Malay Mail, five Uber drivers have been involved in a crackdown by the Road Transport Department (JPJ), under the Ops Teksi Uber 2014 operation – which begun on October 1.
Of the five vehicles involved, one was confirmed as a private vehicle, a Honda Accord, while the other four were commercial hire-and-drive cars. The owner of the Accord has been issued a summons and will face a possible fine of between RM1,000 to RM10,000 as well as a prison sentence should it be demanded. His car has been seized for 30 days pending further investigation.
The four other vehicles were returned to their respective owners – with their documents confiscated pending further investigation by the Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD). Due to a wide range of circumstances, the four vehicles could be returned to owners should proper documents and other factors correlate.
Said operation was launched earlier this month to begin a crackdown on the popular app and its operations with a task force consisting of roughly 30 personnel from the JPJ, SPAD and the police.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
tokmoh (Member)
on 
schmuck
on 
unforgiven
on 
JPJ Director
on 
Julian Lee
on 
ikansepat
on 
Pandai
on 
Black Dog
on 
Same L0rrr
on 
okla
on 
bkb
on 
Maserati(Official)
on 
allergictoidiots
on 
iskhalifah (Member)
on 
Semi-Value (Member)
on 
Eyo (Member)
on 
Najib
on 
JOHN
on 
HKY
on 
Whynot
on 
policeman
on 
Crony King
on 
Barang Naik
on 
alldisc
on 
Bribe berry
on 
Ali
on 
stranger
on 
ali
on 
BLT_Club
on 
transformer
on 
tiger
on 
roxas
on 
RicoT
on 
Db10
on 
tool
on 
Db10
on 
paulz
on 
WhattheBigFuss
on 
Mehmet Az
on 
MeToo
on 
political KE70
on 
SamKL
on 
gaviny
on 
Steve Kok
on 
Rosina Wan Mohamed
on 
Localtaxisucks
on 
Ninja boy
on 
AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments express mixed sentiments on Uber's legal issues and regulation in Malaysia, with some supporting its role for better service and competition, while others criticize the government and authorities like SPAD and JPJ for perceived corruption, favoritism, and ineffective enforcement. Many highlight Uber’s success in providing safer, more affordable, and efficient transport, contrasting with local taxis' poor service. Concerns are raised about illegal taxis, safety, and the need for reforms, with some viewing regulation as benefiting cronies rather than the public.