Toyota showcases safety R&D – oblique crash test, advanced driving simulator and THUMS model range

toyota-oblique-crash-test-prius-06

At the 2016 Toyota Technology Media Event that ended last week, the automaker launched its regional safety campaign for a third consecutive year. The campaign, titled Be Safety Leaders this year, was previously an effort for the ASEAN region, but has now been expanded to include India, Pakistan and four new Southwest Asian countries – Bhutan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal.

The Japanese giant, which ended last year as the world’s top carmaker in sales, also took the opportunity to highlight and demonstrate its safety efforts to media from Asia and the Middle East. The visit to Toyota’s Higashi-Fuji R&D Centre at the foot of Japan’s iconic mountain was a rare opportunity – it has been a couple of years since the facility last hosted a media visit, we were told.

Asia has been experiencing rapid motorisation in recent years, especially in developing markets with a growing middle class. Unfortunately, surging vehicle numbers have been accompanied by the rise in fatal traffic accidents, something that Malaysia is very familiar with.

In fact, our country was used by Toyota to highlight the seriousness of the problem – according to official data, for every 10,000 automobiles, there are 3.1 deaths in Malaysia, tied with Indonesia on that score and ahead of 2.8 deaths in Thailand. To compare with developed countries, the fatal accident rate is just 0.6 per 10k cars in Japan, or 0.5 in the UK.

To address this problem, Toyota – the market leader in most Asian countries – has developed a holistic approach to safety that it calls the “Integrated Three-Part Initiative”. The three elements of this philosophy are Vehicles, People and Traffic Environment, and the ultimate vision is zero traffic fatalities.

For “Traffic Environment”, the big T is working with governments to improve the infrastructure, while the “People” component is all about education, exemplified by the Be Safety Leaders campaign to get Asians to buckle up. “Vehicles” include Toyota’s pursuit of safety in its vehicles, from R&D to the actual safety features.

Toyota’s safety R&D philosophy can be explained in a cycle that starts with investigation and analysis into the causes of accidents and injuries via data. These accidents are then reenacted in various simulations to create tech to counter the issues. Experiments on actual full-scale vehicles are conducted before a model is launched, or before a car is updated.

The next stage is simulation, and we were given a brief introduction to the high-tech driving simulator at Higashi-Fuji. One of the most advanced of its kind, the simulator consists of a 7.1m diameter dome, with a real car inside it (the supplied pics show a Lexus LS, but an HS was on duty during our visit; no recording devices were allowed in the facility). The computer controlled dome sits on one of the world’s largest simulation platforms – it’s 35m high, 20m wide and has a turntable, tilt system and vibration actuator, among other devices.

All the above, plus a 360-degree spherical screen all around the car, combine to provide a highly realistic experience behind the wheel. Toyota had digitally mapped the town surrounding its facility, and this environment was the one that was played as we stood around the car as it was “driven” by a staffer.

I spotted a pretty lady coming out from Lawson (OK, I didn’t get that good a view), a Galant VR4 and an Evo, before we stopped to allow a child to cross the road. The man behind the wheel then intentionally “crashed” the Lexus into the back of an Alphard to end the brief session.

As this writer had his eyes fixed on the screen the whole time, it felt like a faithful enough simulation of real-world driving with equally real sounds, but I was surprised to later hear that the dome was stationary during our run – we didn’t get the full Motion Master experience due to an apparent lack of time. Someone who had her head looking at the ground in the dome confirmed the lack of movement – I can only imagine how real (and fun) it would have been with all systems turned on.

Higashi-Fuji’s driving simulator plays a main role in both driver behaviour analysis and system evaluation tests. Examples of the former are reduced awareness from drowsiness or distractions, and impaired driving (intoxication, illness). The results provide the basis for active safety tech, which is then verified again by the simulator.

We were also treated to a crash test conducted right under our noses, literally. Standing on a platform, we watched in shock as a fourth-generation Prius crashed into a vehicle trolley at 90 km/h. The latest hybrid smashed into the 2.5-tonne obstacle at a 15 degree angle, with 35% overlap.

This new oblique crash test format is more advanced than the usual frontal offset crash test, which is conducted at 64 km/h. Much higher speed aside, this new format crash test – which Toyota implemented last year – sees the tested vehicle impact the trolley at an angle and not in a straight line.

This internal test, an evolution of Toyota’s Global Outstanding Assessment (GOA), surpasses the level of the benchmark crash tests worldwide. For instance, the latest (upgraded in 2015) Euro NCAP ODB crash test sees a car driven into a deformable barrier at 64 km/h with 40% overlap. The test replicates a crash between two cars of the same weight, both travelling at a speed of 50 km/h. Needless to say, the new Prius aced Euro NCAP with the full five stars and a commendable adult occupant score of 92%.

After clearing the debris, we were allowed a closer inspection of the now deceased Prius. The front plastic bits were gone, the front wing on the impacted driver’s side was folded back, the bonnet folded in two and the windscreen cracked; but bits crucial to cabin integrity such as the A pillars and bulkhead appeared undeformed. While the driver’s door was slightly unhinged, all four doors could be opened without much effort, revealing fully deployed airbags. For such a severe impact, the Prius ended up impressively intact.

Some might have qualms about the electric safety of hybrid cars in a crash, but Toyota points out that since it started selling hybrids in 1997 (production had just crossed the 10 million mark), there have been no fatalities related to electric shock.

Efforts to protect occupants from high voltage components include the placement of the battery in a rigid area that’s not easily deformed (such as under the rear seats), and keeping the battery ungrounded in a crash. High voltage wires are isolated by a insulating coat cover. In the event of a crash, a relay blocks power supply. The airbag sensors and the hybrid system are connected, and a crash will instantly trigger all the battery/power supply safety measures. It’s a non-issue.

The crash tests work in concert with the THUMS family. Toyota’s Total Human Model for Safety is not a physical steel and rubber crash test dummy, but a virtual crash test dummy software. The regular dummy cannot simulate injury a human body suffers in a crash, which is why THUMS was developed by Toyota in 1997 – to understand injuries from vehicle accidents and to estimate the effectiveness of safety tech.

THUMS achieves accurate simulation by high-res CT scan images of living human subjects, finite element modelling of body parts, integration of the whole body model and definition of material property for each body part. To verify THUMS, Toyota conducts literature survey on impact biomechanics, loading tests on post mortem human subjects (yes, corpses), simulations of loading tests using THUMS and correlations in mechanical responses (force deflection). It’s complex stuff, done for every part of the body.

For every type of body, too. The THUMS family consists of a large male (189 cm tall), average male (179 cm), small female (153 cm), 10-year old child (138 cm), six-year old child (118 cm) and one that’s three years old (94 cm). There’s also an averaged sized female, a running child, an obese male (BMI 35) and a pregnant woman of seven months.

toyota thums v4 01

The first THUMS surfaced in 2000, followed by Version 2 in 2003, which added faces and bone structure to the virtual models. The third-gen came about in 2008, gaining a brain. In 2010, Version 4 was upgraded with detailed modeling of the brain and also the addition of internal organs and their placement and interaction within the body. Last year, V5 introduced simulated musculature, allowing the models to assume the bracing positions that a human might be in just before a crash.

THUMS is not just used by its creator, but is licensed to car companies and research institutes worldwide. Toyota says that as of June 2016, there are 81 organisations using the human model software across the globe.

One of the fruits of THUMS research outside Toyota is in the seat design requirement for NASCAR, the US race series that sees high speed lateral impacts to the wall at 70 G. THUMS is also used internally in the simulation of active safety systems (such as auto braking) and even to analyse the vibrations in ride comfort.

The scope and depth of R&D involved in the development of safety tech is impressive, and we were just scratching the surface in this day tour of Higashi-Fuji. The fruits of the many man-hours that go into developing passive and active safety tech is already in Toyota’s production cars, and we were brought to Mobilitas at Fuji Speedway to sample the effectiveness of Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) and Pre-Collision System (auto brake) that’s part of Toyota Safety Sense. They work as advertised.

On the local front, Toyota is moving in the right direction when it comes to active safety. The company’s most recent launch was for the Sienta, and the MPV has VSC as standard across the board. We understand that from now on, the skid-preventing safety feature will be present in all of the brand’s passenger car offerings in Malaysia, utilitarian budget models such as the Avanza aside.

While we look forward to more safety technology in our local range, let’s not forget that the basics, if practised religiously (or enforced strictly, which would be more effective IMHO) would definitely bring down Malaysia’s lofty position in the accident fatality table. Let’s drive in a safe and responsible manner, and remember to buckle up, whether in front or at the back. There’s no point in having all the safety tech in the world if we don’t use the one that has been around since 1959.

Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.

Certified Pre-Owned - 1 Year Warranty

10% discount when you renew your car insurance

Compare prices between different insurer providers and use the promo code 'PAULTAN10' when you make your payment to save the most on your car insurance renewal compared to other competing services.

Car Insurance

Danny Tan

Danny Tan loves driving as much as he loves a certain herbal meat soup, and sweet engine music as much as drum beats. He has been in the auto industry since 2006, previously filling the pages of two motoring magazines before joining this website. Enjoys detailing the experience more than the technical details.

 

Comments

  • What a hypocrite. ESC has been around for 20 years, and the vast majority of Toyotas sold here don’t have it. Want to talk about impact protection? Start offering side airbags as standard. It’s just nonsensical to bring up crash statistics in Malaysia when no doubt your own brand contributes greatly to the crashes, thanks to your ESC-less cars.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 53 Thumb down 5
    • karam singh on Sep 11, 2016 at 5:33 pm

      Internationally especially in the US Toyota is a very big brand with good safety features but in Malaysia,
      owns by UMW Toyota, Toyota become rubbish.
      very overpriced car with low equipment,less safety specs
      So, go for Subaru,Honda & Mazda they now leads safety for Japanese brand in Malaysia.
      They earned their Top Safety Picks plus in IIHS
      Hyundai & Kia also earned top safety pick too, they building better car nowadays, their RV going stronger

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 49 Thumb down 5
      • dy246 on Sep 11, 2016 at 11:43 pm

        Safety features but not the actual structural integrity of the vehicle

        http://www.iihs.org/iihs/news/desktopnews/vehicles-with-good-driver-side-protection-may-leave-passengers-at-risk

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
      • karam singh on Sep 12, 2016 at 10:34 am

        But I admit Toyota is the better car maker than any other Japanese brands, even Honda. This is the reason Toyota is the world no 1.

        No matter what Honda may do – screaming VTEC engine, dynamic looking cars, 6 airbags in Honda city here could have beaten Toyota. Heck – Honda can’t even go rallying.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 15
        • What does rallying have to do with 99.9% of Malaysians who drive? Because Honda doesn’t do rallying, they’re inferior to Toyota? City’s 6 airbags is worse than the Vios’ 2 airbags? WAKE UP. The Altis is become a dinosaur. The HR-V is as popular as the Myvi. The 90k full-spec Vios doesn’t have VSC. Toyota Malaysia is now a complete joke, but you refuse to open your eyes.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 6
  • DonkeyKong on Sep 11, 2016 at 3:40 pm

    Toyota? Safety R&D? Must be a joke.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 29 Thumb down 6
  • Holofanboi on Sep 11, 2016 at 3:47 pm

    LOL why is the ‘large’ and ‘average’ male render is that of an overweight male!? xD…im dont even qualify for average male at that kind of height lmao.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
  • Ms Check Pick on Sep 11, 2016 at 4:01 pm

    It is ironic as regional Toyota showcases safety R & D as we know that those R & D is just for developed nation ie USA,Japan & Europe only.Showing the statistic in developing countries ie Malaysia,Thailand & Indonesia etc contributed high fatalities in compared to Japan.They try their best to be denial and innocent but the fact they purposely forgot their fact our badge of production is stripped out most of current basic safety specifications.My advise,give us same standard of cars first then u can make a comparison among countries.Don’t insult us if u can’t be play fair.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 36 Thumb down 2
  • Sonyman1 on Sep 11, 2016 at 4:35 pm

    Eh interesting. First time time they give a shit about safety. That’s a good start

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 3
  • Dy246 on Sep 11, 2016 at 4:36 pm

    Did they conduct the frontal impact tests on both drivers side and passengers side? I’m convinced they probably didn’t, to save costs and hoping no one would find out that they only design cars to meet the lopsided crash tests. Toyota motor corporation is unscrupulous!

    http://www.iihs.org/iihs/news/desktopnews/vehicles-with-good-driver-side-protection-may-leave-passengers-at-risk

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
  • Middle Age Driver (Member) on Sep 11, 2016 at 4:50 pm

    Since Toyota quoted Malaysia, would like to see the same 90kmh crash test conducted on our local Vios, Avanza, Myvi, Bezza, Axia, Alza because these are the real cars Toyota/Daihatsu put on Malaysian roads that partly contributes to the accident rates in the country. No point showing the audience cars which are not driven by the average person on the Malaysian street. When these cars end up as a block of mangled steel, then only Toyota can further understand why there is high fatalities in Malaysian accidents.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 1
  • Bini 4 on Sep 11, 2016 at 5:09 pm

    In Malaysia, the safety feature in Toyota is the tin-milo steel body of Vios, Altis and Camry….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 4
  • ..and UMW toyota strips all the safety features in their cars sold in Malaysia, except for the super-overpriced top spec ones. How ironic.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 1
    • Not just UMW Toyota but Toyota ASEAN..

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
    • Mikey on Sep 13, 2016 at 1:28 pm

      blue, Toyota will not want to sell their strip out cars. Its “UMW” who assemble & sell these cars. If UMW sell Their assemble cars with all the safety features, our P1/P2 will be in BIG trouble.

      UMW is protecting our national cars by churning out sub-standard cars to protect our national car.

      Point the finger to our National Car policy. If we value our lives, we should ask our government to make all car companies to make it a mandatory to offer the latest safety equipment’s in all their face lift/new model.

      To cut it short, M’sian should drive their cars according to limits. Cars DO NOT kills people. Only irresponsible drivers/speeding kills

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
      • inb4 same shit in Indomee, tomyam, pinoy, brunei, myanmar, laos, vietnam, cambodia, etc, ini juga salah P1.

        Pls grow up. Not everything is salah Gov.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
        • Mikey on Sep 14, 2016 at 8:58 am

          Ha ha ha John the talk a lot(nonsense included). What’s the matter J, U usually have a lot of shit to say but in this case U only have Indomee & tomyam !?

          Common, I expect something better from U. By saying “Pls grow up”, U are getting personal & that only means U have lost the plot. Keep commenting man bcos U have many fans here & pls don’t disappoint them OK.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • nabill (Member) on Sep 11, 2016 at 9:48 pm

    dont confuse Toyota and UMW…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
    • Toy Yoda on Sep 13, 2016 at 9:14 am

      Then Toyota should kick UMW’s butt if it cares about its name.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
      • Mikey on Sep 13, 2016 at 2:30 pm

        Toy, Toyota is the leading car manufacturer in the world. If Toyota decide to shift it’s operation to say Thailand, M’sian as a whole is the Big looser. Who will employ the retrenched workers, YOU !

        Besides that, Toyota contribute a large chunk of the profits to UMW(aka Uno cronies). It will not happen bcos the domino effect is too great for UMW & it’s entire food chain. Shalom & Cheers …

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • For ASEAN toyota owners, the only safety feature available to them, is the T badge in front of their cars. Salesmen like Albert & Sammy convinced them, that the badge made their cars invincible.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3
  • paanjang16 on Sep 12, 2016 at 6:11 am

    Toyota overseas in Japan, US, Australia and EU is highly respected due to being a leader in safety.

    But in Malaysia under UMW Toyota and P2, it is a leader in squeezing profits. Nowhere else does a member of the Toyota family strip its cars of even basic equipment like ABS and VSC to make its cars more ‘affordable’ but add in trivial stuff like bodykits, ‘anti-snatch hook’, spoilers etc.

    No one can forget the omission of VSC from their Camry not too long ago.

    I dare P2 and Toyota to show crash test for their AXIA, Bezza and Myvi using international standards and even a cross section of their cars like what P1 is doing.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
  • Scarface on Sep 12, 2016 at 9:15 am

    Tthe regulation of car sold in Malaysia need to be changed for consumers to own safe cars. Just allow cars with full safety spec to be sold. However, owners with their car’s airbag deployed may not replace them. Similar to electronic controls since the car still can be driven without it working. Cost of replacement of these items vs value of the vehicle is taken into consideration. So, it’s all boils down to human error and attitude when driving. You don’t need all this if you don’t drive. You don’t even think about it. A responsible manufacturer will continue to improve safety of its products hoping that consumers will continue to buy from them. Well, if the consumer didn’t survive the crash, they will lose one repeat customer. All safety features in a car wouldn’t help if the person behind the wheel cannot guarantee that he or she will not make any single mistake or react emotionally. The only ‘thing’ can do that is a robot but AI may make it respond like a human.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • transformer on Sep 12, 2016 at 10:22 am

    in Malaysia Toyota car sold under UMW… Everyone knows UMW are GLC…. So just open up malaysian’s car market, abolish NAP, NEP and let TMC directly comes into Malaysia then they will have to offer same specs like for USDM….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 5
    • frankC on Sep 12, 2016 at 2:37 pm

      competition will eventually see Toyota in full spec.. latest Honda accord have come out with full 6 airbag for all trims… now that Honda have outsold Toyota in msia, let’s see what Toyota and umw will do about it… if no change then Honda will continue to command leadership.. vios is no where near city now

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
    • Only reason why toyota is still adamant to gip comparable safety features versus “cronies” P1/ Honda/ Naza/ China brands, is becoz come hell or high waters they will alwiz be Party Hard official car suppliers. So they cannot be persoaled.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 2
  • Basheer on Sep 13, 2016 at 8:49 am

    When to replace faulty airbag inflator? Always no stock excuse.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  • Jobless on Sep 13, 2016 at 9:11 am

    Suggestion for PT that any articles on Toyota cars safety features are to have a caveat saying that the safety features in the articles will most likely NOT be installed in Toyota cars sold in Malaysia. Otherwise people might be misled.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  • Oh, the 360 degree virtual reality chamber. So thats where my P2 did the 100,000km endurance and reliability test for Biza. 21st century modern age of testing for new cars, yo!

    Kalahkan BMW, Mesidis, Bugatti, VW, Audi, Hyundai, P1, and all other car makers that still do camo road test.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
 

Add a comment

required

required