Ford Mustang finally dumps ancient 4.0L V6!

ford-mustang-duratec-37

The latest Ford Mustang may look hot but if you’re not driving one with the V8 under the hood, what you have to deal with is a 4.0 litre Cologne V6 which only makes 210 horses and 325Nm of torque. Other than the Mustang, the engine is only found in trucks like the Ranger and the Explorer, and it also found its way into the Land Rover LR3 as a baseline petrol engine.

Now the Mustang has been updated for next year and FINALLY gets a proper ‘baseline’ V6, this time from the Cyclone family, officially called the Duratec 37. You’ll also find this engine in the North American Mazda 6 and CX-9. Displacement is down to 3.7 litres but the engine actually produces more power than the 4.0 litre it replaces.

The new Duratec 37 makes 305 horsepower and 380Nm of torque, which is actually more than the very modern Nissan’s 3.7L V6’s 366Nm, though that’s just comparing peak torque figures and not how wide the engine can make its peak torque.

Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.

Certified Pre-Owned - 1 Year Warranty

10% discount when you renew your car insurance

Compare prices between different insurer providers and use the promo code 'PAULTAN10' when you make your payment to save the most on your car insurance renewal compared to other competing services.

Car Insurance

Paul Tan

After dabbling for years in the IT industry, Paul Tan initially began this site as a general blog covering various topics of personal interest. With an increasing number of readers paying rapt attention to the motoring stories, one thing led to another and the rest, as they say, is history.

 

Comments

  • dotdot on Dec 03, 2009 at 1:51 am

    cool

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • xptmsb07_09 (Member) on Dec 03, 2009 at 2:29 am

    hot

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • cool or hot?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • warm

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • panas

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Ariff on Dec 03, 2009 at 3:19 am

    sejuk

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Mazda 3 MPS on Dec 03, 2009 at 3:20 am

    finally….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • chidori on Dec 03, 2009 at 4:21 am

    suam

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • budin on Dec 03, 2009 at 4:34 am

    beku

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • bmpower on Dec 03, 2009 at 4:47 am

    210? are you kidding me ford?

    210hp from 4.0 ?

    your previous B8T engine old engine jv with mazda.

    the most legendary B8T 210 that produce 210hp was only from 1.8cc!

    well i know, it was turbo.

    but from 4.0l, it should get at least 350hp!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • wuttaheck on Dec 03, 2009 at 4:56 am

    stupid american…finally they learn it the hard way that bigger engine does not always mean bigger output…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • 210hp from a 4.0 litre engine is too small!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • mitlanevo on Dec 03, 2009 at 5:17 am

    4G63 and 4B11 turbo, 400hp in FQ-400, beat that…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • 4g63tdsm on Dec 03, 2009 at 5:25 am

    The old 4.0V6 may only produce 210hp, but it makes 245nm of torque….

    I've driven them before. They ain't that bad.

    FWIW, these are simple and reliable engines, and run on 88 octane gas.

    Even at that time, the 4.6 modular V8 made only something around 285hp (apparently 315hp now), obviously, you don't want your base engine to match the output of the top end V8.

    HP is not what is about in pony cars. Its the stump pulling, tire shredding, accelerate like a banshee at any gear torque. I had a Camaro Z28 with a massive 5.7L LT1GM smallblock. It would spin the 245 rears up on 3rd gear at 100+kmh. It only had something like 285hp, but 330ft-lbs (450Nm) of torque. And the sound of that V8 through the twin flowmasters……

    Eventually changed to a 2.0T Eclipse AWD because that monster is close to impossible to drive in the snow…….The forcefed Eclipse made more hp and slightly less torque than the LT1. But the feel is completely different.

    If you call yourself a car enthusiate, you should try these out at least once in your lifetime. You will "get it"…..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • mingyuyu on Dec 03, 2009 at 5:46 am

    Why no 300bhp?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Mazda 3 MPS on Dec 03, 2009 at 7:19 am

    it doesnt matter what engine it is….the mustang has a bad chassis

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Arct|c on Dec 03, 2009 at 7:53 am

    ford is for wussy

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • noProton on Dec 03, 2009 at 8:37 am

    I've got my 308TH rechiped to 210hp with 300NM~ I can spin in 2nd gear tough!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • That Guy In The Ford on Dec 03, 2009 at 8:52 am

    wuttaheck said,

    December 2, 2009 @ 8:56 pm

    stupid american…finally they learn it the hard way that bigger engine does not always mean bigger output…

    (Suck it)

    There's no replacement For Displacement.

    You may be able to get an Acceptional amout of power out of a smaller engine… With a lot of moddifications, and a basic rebuild. Take on of the "Stupid American" Engines and pit it against your modded small engine. And it will make as much if not more STOCK. Thank you. Goodnight!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • nizam80 (Member) on Dec 03, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    I will always love the new mustang and the old bullet one. Always wonder if Ford will ever be bringing it to Malaysia officially which is very unlikely. A 3.7 litre with 380nm of torque might seems more than enough for this legendary American muscle. Anyway, is there a right hand drive version of the Mustang?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • shooter on Dec 03, 2009 at 8:41 pm

    4g63tdsm said,

    The old 4.0V6 may only produce 210hp, but it makes 245nm of torque….

    ——————————————————————

    i think you ment to say 245 ft/lb – 245 nm equates to aprox 177 ft/lb, which is pretty weak for a 4.0L V8, even runnin on 88 RON. any way, its not just about the PEAK numbers that count, delivery or SPREAD also comes into play, you can have impressive high out put figures from small capacity egines, that delivers power close to the rev limit (e.g Hondas' s2000 F20A engine-150 lb @ 6500 rpm!!! very peaky…), which requires a lot of short ratio gears(6- 7 speeders) to optimize the power; or you can have a big capacity engine that pumps out a lower output, but on a wider/ thicker spread, which requires taller and lesser numbers of ratios, that make driving alot more laid back ( think of cruising @ 110 kmh in top gear and the engine spinnin circa 2.5k rpm) like that old Ford engine; i havent' seen the dyno, but i woulnt be surprised if 70-80% of the tourque is avilable from as low as 2k rpm, and through out the entire rev range…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • "Why no 300bhp?"-mingyuyu

    @mingyuyu

    The base Mustang's new 3.7 liter V6 makes 305hp.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Mazda 3 MPS on Dec 04, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    noProton said,

    December 3, 2009 @ 12:37 am

    I’ve got my 308TH rechiped to 210hp with 300NM~ I can spin in 2nd gear tough!!
    ——————-

    vti or turbo

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • Nick R on Jan 16, 2010 at 9:13 pm

    The 4.0L SOHC V6 actually makes 210HP and 245lb/ft of torque, with a redline of 6,000RPM. Combined with either the automatic or manual, acceleration is pretty spirited, I definitely wouldn't call it slow. We have an 07 with the automatic it does just fine.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
 

Add a comment

required

required