Alfa Romeo new line-up pushed back to 2020 – report

150624_Alfa-romeo_Giulia-Reveal_02

The much talked about Alfa Romeo Giulia is spearheading the Italian brand’s global reboot and return to the US market, but it won’t be doing it all alone – the sporty sedan will be supported by seven other siblings. Now, reports of a delay have surfaced, something that fans and well-wishers must be immune to by now.

An official document has purportedly revealed that the supporting cast will arrive later than expected. The original plan was for all eight new models, Giulia included, to surface by 2018. The target date has now been pushed back to mid-2020 at the earliest, Carscoops reports.

The main reason behind the delay is the slowdown of the Chinese market. Also cited are reduced investment in Alfa Romeo from 2018 and the increased need for an expanding distribution network across the globe.

Giulia aside, Alfa’s fresh line-up will have two SUVs codenamed Tipo 949 and Tipo 962. After those, an executive sedan codenamed Tipo 961 will go after the BMW 5 Series and rivals. Also planned are a new sports car (in coupe and Spider forms) and two compact models, one of the latter to replace the Giulietta.

It is added that despite the delay, Alfa is still confident that annual sales will rise from 80,000 units to the 400,000 mark, when all eight models work in unison.

This comes after Automotive News Europe reported that the Giulia Quadrifoglio sedan, revealed to much fanfare in June, will now go on sale in Europe in the middle of next year, six months later than initially planned. Regular Giulias are set to debut in late 2016.

The same report, which cites suppliers, adds that Alfa’s first SUV will not surface before early 2017, nine months later than planned. The US launches for both cars are scheduled to happen about three to six months after Europe.

When it comes to Alfa Romeo, it’s best not to have any expectations, or trust any promises. Only until the car goes on sale, and appears in showrooms, then we start to believe.

GALLERY: Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio

Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.

10% discount when you renew your car insurance

Compare prices between different insurer providers and use the promo code 'PAULTAN10' when you make your payment to save the most on your car insurance renewal compared to other competing services.

Car Insurance

Danny Tan

Danny Tan loves driving as much as he loves a certain herbal meat soup, and sweet engine music as much as drum beats. He has been in the auto industry since 2006, previously filling the pages of two motoring magazines before joining this website. Enjoys detailing the experience more than the technical details.

 

Comments

  • DonkeyKong on Dec 14, 2015 at 2:14 pm

    State-owned when it was in financial troubles before WW1, and despite winning races and producing great drivers’ cars, they were constantly in financial troubles and needed rescuing over and over. They also had plenty of failed tie-ups with foreign auto companies, while the Italian police used their cars extensively.

    More than 100 years in the business and still couldn’t get it right, but the Italians didn’t call it a blood-sucking company, the reason for expensive cars in Italy, etc. and asked for it to be shut down and buried..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 4
    • are you sure.. where you source, did you live in italy for the pass 20 years..

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5
    • no citzen in they right mind, want a company that use they tax money over and over again, just to stay in buisness..

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4
  • Sanita on Dec 14, 2015 at 5:59 pm

    Alfa should close shop

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5
  • Unknown on Dec 14, 2015 at 7:48 pm

    Alfa Romeo is like P1 of Italy. Every time they launch something new they will always delay it, just like P1 with the 1.3 turbo engine and new Perdana. When they finally launch it, the competition have move on.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
 

Add a comment

required

required