Verdict
At RM106,800, the Aion ES costs RM72,220 more than the RM34,580 Perodua Bezza, but it brings a 136 hp, 225 Nm electric motor, a 55.2 kWh battery and 442 km of claimed range. It is also substantially larger, with a 2,750 mm wheelbase against 2,455 mm. The Bezza is the rational low-entry-cost choice: its 67 hp 1.0 litre petrol engine is rated at 4.4 L/100 km, road tax is RM20 a year and its 508-litre boot beats the ES's 450 litres. The ES suits buyers committed to EV charging; the Bezza makes more sense for a tight budget and maximum luggage space.
Pick the Aion ES if you can justify the RM72,220 premium for 442 km EV range, 225 Nm and an eight-year/160,000 km warranty.
Pick the Perodua Bezza if RM34,580 pricing, 4.4 L/100 km rated economy and a 508-litre boot matter more than EV power and range.
Key differences
- Price: Aion ES RM106,800; Perodua Bezza RM34,580.
- Power and torque: Aion ES 136 hp and 225 Nm; Perodua Bezza 67 hp and 91 Nm.
- Energy use: Aion ES has a 55.2 kWh battery and 442 km range; Perodua Bezza is rated at 4.4 L/100 km with a 36-litre tank.
- Size: Aion ES is 4,810 mm long with a 2,750 mm wheelbase; Perodua Bezza is 4,150 mm long with a 2,455 mm wheelbase.
- Boot space: Aion ES 450 litres; Perodua Bezza 508 litres.
- Warranty and road tax: Aion ES eight years/160,000 km and RM70 yearly; Perodua Bezza five years/150,000 km and RM20 yearly.
ES
- 136 hp and 225 Nm electric motor
- 442 km claimed range from a 55.2 kWh battery
- Eight-year, 160,000 km manufacturer warranty
- RM106,800 costs RM72,220 more
- RM70 annual road tax versus RM20
- 450-litre boot is 58 litres smaller
Bezza
- RM34,580 entry price
- 4.4 L/100 km rated fuel economy
- 508-litre boot and 60:40 split-folding rear seats
- 67 hp and 91 Nm trail the Aion ES's 136 hp and 225 Nm
- Five-year, 150,000 km warranty is shorter
- Five-speed manual rather than a single-ratio automatic
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM106,800 | RM34,580✓ |
| Body type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Segment | C-Segment | A-Segment |
| Assembly | CBU | CKD |
| Ownership | ||
| Road tax / year | RM70 | RM20✓ |
| Powertrain | ||
| Engine Tech | 400V architecture | 12-valve DOHC, Naturally Aspirated with Variable Valve Timing |
| Capacity | — | 998 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 67 hp |
| Torque | — | 91 Nm |
| Fuel | Electric | Petrol |
| Bore | — | 71 mm |
| Compression Ratio | — | 11.5 |
| Number of Motors | 1 | — |
| Motor Horsepower | 136 hp | — |
| Motor Torque | 225 Nm | — |
| Battery Capacity | 55.2 kWh | — |
| EV Range | 442 km | — |
| Charging Rate (AC) | 6.6 kW | — |
| Charging Rate (DC) | 60 kW | — |
| V2L | 3.3 kW | — |
| Drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Single Ratio Automatic | Manual |
| Transmission Name | — | 5MT |
| Gears | — | 5 |
| Transmission Manufacturer | — | Akashi Kikai |
| Driveline | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Performance & Efficiency | ||
| Rated Economy | — | 4.4 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,810 mm | 4,150 mm |
| Width | 1,880 mm | 1,620 mm |
| Height | 1,545 mm | 1,510 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,750 mm | 2,455 mm |
| Weight | — | 930 kg |
| Fuel Tank | — | 36 litres |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot Space | 450 litres | 508 litres✓ |
| Front Tyre | 215/55 R17 | 175/65R14 |
| Rear Tyre | 215/55 R17 | 175/65R14 |
| Spare Tyre | — | Full Size 14" |
| Factory Tyres | — | Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 |
| Chassis | ||
| Assembly | China (CBU) | Malaysia (CKD) |
| Front Suspension | — | MacPherson Strut |
| Rear Suspension | — | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 14" Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 14" Alloy |
| Steering | — | Rack and Pinion (Electric Power Steering) |
| Crash Safety Ratings | ||
| ASEAN NCAP | — | 4 stars |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | — | Driver and Passenger |
| ABS/EBD | — | ✓ |
| Alarm | — | ✓ |
| Immobilizer | — | ✓ |
| Child Safety Lock | — | Manual for rear doors |
| Seat Belts | — | 5 Three-point |
| ISOFIX | — | Available on Two Outer Rear Passenger Seats |
| Lane-keeping Assist | — | No |
| Collision Warning | — | ✓ |
| Seatbelt Reminder | — | Front Seats Only |
| Safety Notes | — | Solar and Security Window Film |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlamps | — | LED Reflector |
| Taillamps | — | LED Combination |
| Front Foglamps | — | ✓ |
| Wing Mirror Turn Indicators | — | ✓ |
| Cabin | ||
| Front Seats | — | Manual Adjustable, Driver's seat height adjustable |
| Rear Seats | — | 60:40 Split-folding |
| Front Air-con | — | Manual Air-con |
| Power Sockets | — | 1 Front |
| Interior Lighting | — | Map Lights |
| Cup Holders | — | 2 Front |
| Audio | — | Radio with 4 Speakers |
| Convenience | ||
| Power Windows | — | Four Windows, Driver's Side Auto Down |
| Engine Start | — | Manual Key |
| Locks | — | Remote Control Operation |
| Auto Start/Stop | — | ✓ |
| Boot Operation | — | Remote Control Activation |
| Parking Sensor Front | — | 2 Sensors |
| Parking Sensor Rear | — | 2 Sensors |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓ |
| Instrument Cluster | — | Backlit Analogue |
| Parking Brake | — | Handbrake |
| Convenience Notes | — | USB Charger |
| Warranty | ||
| Warranty Mileage Manufacturer | 160,000 km✓ | 150,000 km |
| Warranty Manufacturer | 8 years✓ | 5 years |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
Used ES & Bezza for sale
ES vs Bezza FAQ
Is the Aion ES or Perodua Bezza better?
The Aion ES is better for buyers who want 442 km claimed EV range, 225 Nm and a larger C-segment sedan. The Perodua Bezza is better for low upfront cost, 4.4 L/100 km rated economy and its larger 508-litre boot.
What is the price difference?
The Aion ES is RM106,800 and the Perodua Bezza is RM34,580, so the gap is RM72,220.
Which has the longer warranty?
The Aion ES has the longer manufacturer warranty at eight years or 160,000 km. The Perodua Bezza is covered for five years or 150,000 km.