New 7-seater Toyota Rush SUV launched!
The new Toyota Rush has been launched in Malaysia and UMW Toyota showrooms will start taking bookings from today onwards. Read more about the new 7-seater fully imported 4X2 Toyota Rush 1.5 liter SUV after the jump.
Click to enlarge
The new Rush is a 7-seater monocoque SUV based on an adapted Toyota Avanza platform, and is powered by a 1.5 liter VVT-i engine called the 3SZ-VE, installed longtitudinally in the Rush’s engine bay. It drives the two rear wheels. The 3SZ-VE produces 109 PS at 6,000rpm and 141Nm of torque at 4,400rpm.
Three variants of the new Toyota Rush are available - the manual 1.5G, the automatic 1.5G and the automatic top of the line 1.5S, which is only available in automatic. The manual variant has the 3SZ-VE paired with a 5-speed manual, while the automatic version has a 4-speed auto with a gated shift. The drivetrain is 2WD, which is lighter and offers better fuel economy.
The Toyota Rush is 4,410mm long, 1,695mm wide and 1,745mm tall including the roof rails. Its wheelbase is 2,685mm long. Track is 1,445mm at the front and 1,460mm at the rear. The manual variant weighs 1,210kg while the automatic is 10kg heavier. The suspension is a MacPherson strut setup with stabilizer bar at the front, and a 4-link live axle at the rear, fitted iwth a lateral rod to maintain axle stability during fast cornering. Front brakes are solid discs while the rear brakes use drums. Turning radius is 5.2 meters, which is better than average for a SUV of this wheelbase. The Toyota Rush has an approach angle of 38.5 degrees and a departure angle of 24.5 degrees.
The Toyota Rush has an interior done up in beige with fabric seats. Cabin length is 2,440mm and cabin width is 1,385mm. There are 3 rows of seats in a 2-3-2 arrangment, and the second row has a 60mm fore-aft slid adjustment with a backrest reclining function. The Rush has second row air conditioning vents mounted on the ceiling, which also serves to cool the third row. The third row takes up most of the car’s boot space, but if you require this boot space you can fold it forwards against the back of the second row. Access to the third row is easy via the double-action folding second row seats, but the low-ish ceiling because of the high-ish floor will make it hard for people with back problems to get into the third row, so be sure to let granny sit in either the front or second row! Access to the boot space is via a side-hinged door which also has the spare tyre mounted on it.
On to equipment levels - the in-car entertainment is a single disc MP3-capable head unit that sends tunes to 6 speakers (4 speakers plus 2 tweeters). The emergency kit includes a jumper cable, first aid kit and a safety triangle. The boot comes with a luggage net. The wing mirrors have turn indicators integrated into them. The Toyota Rush rides on 16 inch alloy wheels wrapped with 215/65R16 tyres. The driver’s seat has height adjustment.
Storage areas are also aplenty - a glovebox, a little coin box, front center storage below the air conditioning controls for your mobile phone and etc, the center console box inside the arm rest, a sunglasses holder, door trim pockets on all doors, seat back pockets, and also third row storage on each side of the car.
The 1.5S has a few extra equipment options over the 1.5G - these include a 2-DIN head unit that also supports cassette other than a CD instead of a 1-DIN unit, projector headlamps instead of reflector lense headlamps, foglamps, an LED-powered high mount stop lamp instead of a bulb-powered one, a rear spoiler, power retractable door mirrors, leather wrapping on the gear shift and steering wheel, dual SRS front airbags (1.5G only has a driver airbag) and strangely - anti-lock brakes and electronic brakeforce distribution. Yup, ABS and EBD are not standard on the Toyota Rush as the 1.5G manual and auto models do not have these safety options.
Warranty for the new Toyota Rush is for 3 years or 100,000km, and the Rush is a CBU import from Indonesia. The following is the price list for Peninsular Malaysia, OTR with insurance:
Toyota Rush 1.5G M/T - RM85,888
Toyota Rush 1.5G A/T - RM88,888
Toyota Rush 1.5S A/T - RM94,888
It comes in four colours - Blue Metallic (the signature colour), Silver Mica Metallic, Champagne Mica Metallic and Black Mica. Kinda looks like the love child of a Toyota RAV4 and a Toyota Fortuner… looks really attractive but the smallish engine and the lack of ABS across the range is kinda disappointing.
Third row seating
Projector headlamps for the 1.5S - Click to enlarge
Reflector headlamps for the 1.5G - Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
January 29, 2008 @ 12:29 am
ffuuuhh…
paultan lagi cepat!!!
i did hear of an event at the subang branch from a mate who used that main road….so this is the event!
looks like paul is taking more images from the Toyota marketing presentations!!
good job paul!!! more insider secrets perhaps.
how come no models like the russian Lexus??
January 29, 2008 @ 12:36 am
Aik?? I thought 1st February is the launching date? Wow, so fast!
Paul, you’re super duper fast!!!
January 29, 2008 @ 12:43 am
my question is the ride quality, ??
January 29, 2008 @ 12:43 am
rush rush….
2wd only yaa…
paul,what the engine source is same with vios/yaris?…
my opinion..
the interior,especially console look abit like nissan cube…
the tacometer like they take from hilux,fortuner…
toyota manage well in sharing platform yaa…
add some thousand RM more from vios…
get the rush….
mmm,if toyota malaysia release this rush….
what rebadge model for new perodua kembara eh?…
Paul Tan says: the engine is from the avanza 1.5 (3SZ-VE), not the vios/yaris (1NZ-FE)
January 29, 2008 @ 12:47 am
As i suspected, is damn expensive for this car!!! Even expensive then a Avanza 1.5L a lot! I think this car is almost the same Wif Avanza since it has only 4X2 RWD drive train!!!
I dont think this car can sell well in Boleh Land, if u guys go and check the Indonesian website this car cost less then RM80k for 1.5G for M/T when convert … If i want to buy this car, i rather take the 1.5G avanza…
http://www.toyota.co.id/cars/price/?Model=Rush
January 29, 2008 @ 12:48 am
ohoo,thanks paul!…
January 29, 2008 @ 12:57 am
I remember seeing Rush being launched at Jakarta a year ago. And the price was something like RM50K+.
January 29, 2008 @ 1:03 am
toyota is really good at making money. shockingly good at it.
nice looking body + whatever parts bin they can find in their enormous product range = SUCCESS.
Poor poor livina…. there goes a well designed, well executed, less cunning car down the drain.
1.5 Ltr + 7 Seater + RWD + Off Road looks = WHEREONEARTHCANYOUFINDSOMETHINGLIKETHAT?
January 29, 2008 @ 1:13 am
Luckily price in langkawi 57k. i want to book this one instead of Livina more than 60k
January 29, 2008 @ 1:29 am
This is where Toyota excel the most… selling what the people want. You want a 7 seater and short on cash, go get the Avanza. Want something more adventurous, get the Rush.
Seats 7 in 3 rows. Back air-con vent to cool the rear passenger (some more expensive SUV dun even have this). Who cares about the el cheapo head units or fabric… look at the price…!!! though i think its a little on the high side, in this country the Rush price is competitive.
i like the Daihatsu Be-Go interior and the short wheelbase more.
January 29, 2008 @ 1:31 am
I must say I was drawn to the look of this car, very RAV4-ish.
Until THAT interior shot.
Is it me or is that dashboard the ugliest (and cheapest) I’ve seen?
Like a van. In a bad bad way.
January 29, 2008 @ 1:32 am
Cheapo Indonesia Car
January 29, 2008 @ 1:46 am
I think I prefer the Suzuki Vitara 2.0
Fully Japan Import with 2.0 engine.
More value for money than this.. I guess.
Don’t be blinded by the badge people!
Always see Toyota on the road, very boring.
January 29, 2008 @ 2:06 am
frankly speaking, i rather choose livina…
January 29, 2008 @ 2:17 am
blerkz said,
January 29, 2008 @ 1:46 am
I think I prefer the Suzuki Vitara 2.0
Fully Japan Import with 2.0 engine.
More value for money than this.. I guess.
Don’t be blinded by the badge people!
_______
haha…i agreed. when i saw the car it looks good outside. but when i scroll down i thot how come got some china car cheapo looking interior photos? i thought i was in another article of this blog. Coz it looked like naza sutera quality.
surely japan CBU suzuki vitara is better than this china interior indonesia CBU “japanese” car.
ppl will buy just for the brand alone. no wonder toyota make such easy money.
still it will sell as though it was given for free. and probably eat up avanza and vios market a share due to the price range.
January 29, 2008 @ 2:32 am
eeewww the front so fugly!!! But i like the arse hehe
January 29, 2008 @ 3:20 am
Isn’t this the Daihatsu Terios in Indonesia? If Toyota Rush in Indonesia is only 5-seater like the S’pore version. The 7-seater in Indonesia is Daihatsu Terios. Both selling very well in Indonesia. Terios and Rush was launched in Indonesia last year. Grey importers sold the Rush in Indonesia 2 years ago for about Rp. 250 million, about RM100k at that time.
Rest In Peace Pak Harto….
January 29, 2008 @ 3:22 am
More expansive than Avanza, I am guessing less power from a 1.5l engine to bring 7 people will surely struggle. Looks like a small compact car but built with 7-seater arrangement. Toyota is hoping that it will appeal to people with big families who would not mind having an underpowered, cheap interior to carry them a long. Looks a lot more like the Unser but the Unser has a bigger engine, and I think is slightly lighter to this car
January 29, 2008 @ 6:44 am
Is this a joke??? A 7 seater people mover with a 1.5 litre engine? Surely you would need a 3.0 litre engine at the minimum for a 7 people seater. Even the Subaru Tribeca, which is a 7 people mover with a 3.0 litre engine, has been criticised for being underpowered. Are buyers of the Rush just going to do inner city rides with it?
I think we can use the erosion of a stone by the wind to measure how long it takes to get from 0 to 60!
January 29, 2008 @ 7:08 am
petulance said,
January 29, 2008 @ 6:44 am
Is this a joke??? A 7 seater people mover with a 1.5 litre engine? Surely you would need a 3.0 litre engine at the minimum for a 7 people seater
Where have u been la?…avanza 1.3 had been selling for ages in Msia..and its a 7 seater la dey….even Kancil 850 some people crammed 6-7 people…hehe..no prob dude….I think you wouldnt get any cheaper 7 seater SUV from other brands (unless P2 is bringing out the new Kembara), besides its a Toyota….i think its gonna sell well !..by d way..Paul, hear anything on Toyota launching the shortbase pulak ke?
January 29, 2008 @ 7:23 am
Interesting to note this this is as big as the first generation 4 door RAV4. Cars are indeed getting bigger.
Would be nice if one can swap in a larger 3SFE from the Rav4.
As I always maintained, at this price, perhaps a slighlty used CRV might make better sence.
January 29, 2008 @ 7:23 am
Utterly pointless… 4×2 simply defeats the purpose of a Sports Utility Vehicle…
January 29, 2008 @ 7:58 am
Eh! RM85K above only for 1.5cc. No way man. Made in Indon pulak tu. I say no. Thumb down. Thumb down.
January 29, 2008 @ 8:07 am
GOOD: Exterior looks nice & Toyota badge (perception of good reliability & after-sales service)
BAD: Overpriced for an Asean-made car, underpowered (resulting high FC), cheap & ugly interior, no off-road capabilities despite being SUV, no standard safety equipment (EBS, Airbags & Active Vehicle Control).
Add another RM15K+, and you’re off with a Japanese CBU Grand Vitara, with bigger 2.0L engine, full 4WD, safety equipments, and of course with better overall quality.
http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/29/suzuki-grand-vitara-for-rm109900/
Yeaaa agree with ingolstadt. UMW Toyota really makes good money out of people’s pockets. They should do more effort in cutting the costs down.
Consumers, do your research well before buying.
January 29, 2008 @ 8:10 am
exterior is nice, but interior looks cheap.. p1 new model interior looks much modern and expensive….
January 29, 2008 @ 8:21 am
i can tell you all a lot of reused products from toyota. a lot of parts are from avanza. Just like savvy and the new saga.
January 29, 2008 @ 8:32 am
wutttttttt???? a cassette player????
January 29, 2008 @ 8:36 am
the car interior look very cheap, for that price range.
January 29, 2008 @ 8:43 am
Boring car and overpriced. Fuel consumption sure like thirsty pig.
January 29, 2008 @ 8:43 am
I told you all oredi…this Rush sure come out b4 CNY.. Then again..Toyota is genius in making one car in same platform sell on different model in different countries, cost cutting here and there.. They dont care about customers who want to buy…they just sell because the brand so strong worldwide. Put anything under ‘T’ batch sure can sell..especially here in M’sia..anything with ‘T’ batch is reliable, good quality, satisfaction no.1. Only true car lovers knows which is intan which is kaca…For toyota its simple, makes a lots of car, sell them and makes money…
January 29, 2008 @ 8:43 am
Man … really VIgo price …. Manaul 88k , auto 93k for Vigo ?? … no hope but compare to nissan Livana which one worth ?? but only change the one wanna buy avanza maybe look into this rush … expensive … let c what price will be sell in P2 kemabara replacement model … hope not too expensive ..
January 29, 2008 @ 8:51 am
CRV still maintain its status but grand vitara is much more wiser than this T brand.
January 29, 2008 @ 8:53 am
errr… another low cost car but sold at the price like a high end car… and the engine bay just messy.. wiring fly over everywhere… I can buy an Skoda Octavia 1.8T AT with this price at China.. upset….
January 29, 2008 @ 8:54 am
Any news of the new kembara replacment???
January 29, 2008 @ 9:06 am
nice look but the price not good. i won’t buy this model definitely unless it is cheap. preferred livina since i saw the real unit last friday. afterall this is not 4×4 model, at least livina have 1.8.
January 29, 2008 @ 9:08 am
the exterior…acceptable..but the interior(sigh)…
look so cheap for rm90k++….how come??really not value for money!!
January 29, 2008 @ 9:17 am
A cheap car for an off-road looking, 7 seater… nobody gonna go off road in this one. Well done Toyota.
January 29, 2008 @ 9:22 am
want_diy said,
January 29, 2008 @ 8:54 am
Any news of the new kembara replacment???
___________________________________________________________________________
Kembara will come out on the same platform, shorter wheelbase & 5 seater. Change the ‘T’ batch, change the headlamp & tail light, enterior lil’ bit here and there. Price it right below 60k..there you go for All New Kembara. For Toyota its okay..tak mau beli Rush tak apa..go buy the ‘nationaled’ status Kembara..our money still goes to the same taukeh’s pocket; Toyota Motor Corp..
January 29, 2008 @ 9:23 am
ermm…. if i want a 7-seater, i’d got for a Livina for around the same price. Get a 1.8l car, and it looks better built too.
I don’t think you’ll really want go go offroading in this one afterall, esp since it comes in 2WD and a puny 1.5l engine. If you’re staying in estate area then i guess ok la.
January 29, 2008 @ 9:29 am
Despite the large tires and ground clearance, it is still a 2 wheel drive, which Rush, as an SUV, will perform miserably compared to 4WD/all-wheel-drive wagons in rough and muddy terrains.
Despite the monocoque structure advantage compared to Avanza, Rush’s floor is way above the ground and (together with unfavorable height:width ratio) that offsets the ride and stability advantage of monocoque structure when taken along the countryside’s winding roads.
So Rush is intended for:
poseur soccer moms (or dads) in the suburbs
to carry their kids and cargos while maintain that youthful character (and ruggedness for males)
to impress other moms and dads that despite already losing their bachelor status, they still maintain their youthful cute-ness, vigor and excursion
while still having the advantage of a fuel-sipper multipurpose utility carrier and ability to park in tight spots.
Unfortunately i am not impressed with such ppl. To look cute and youthful, I would take the Swift. If I want to carry a bunch of kids, I would take the Livina (with better riding refinement). For more excursion and vigorous look, it only takes a little bit of money to buy a more powerful, spacious Grand Vitara. Or a stylish 4WD Kia Sportage for a real rural expedition.
January 29, 2008 @ 9:47 am
Nice exterior but lousy and cheap interior. Some more no abs and way too expensive. Better go for Avanza. Although Avanza also has cheap and lousy interior, the 1.5g has dual airbags, ABS and much cheaper. Both are 2WD anyway. For this price better go for Livina.
January 29, 2008 @ 9:47 am
Any idea on the Avanza price drop after Rush launched? Planning to get Avanza, hope it may bring down the price for Avanza. Targeting for Avanza 1.5L.
January 29, 2008 @ 9:50 am
Just heard of it and Paul have it all in here… Superb!!!!
Looking forward to SUV…..
January 29, 2008 @ 9:52 am
King Samurai..
I dont think P2 will do cosmetic change on New Kembara..Except swap the T badge with P2 badge. JUst look at current Kembara..exactly same as Daihatsu Terios. And somemore they targetted at a very small market (300 unit/month)
January 29, 2008 @ 9:52 am
sweet !
i’m getting one today !
bye bye to avanza !
January 29, 2008 @ 10:03 am
agree with some of the comments above. the exterior look totally deceived us. the interior looks more like a TATA car than a Toyota. and using the same platform as Avanza, which is van/truck based… i doubt the ride is gonna be smooth..
January 29, 2008 @ 10:11 am
Expensive!
January 29, 2008 @ 10:13 am
I think we can start speculating on how much the SWB Kembara replacement will cost. Hope it comes with the 1.5l engine too, along with standard ABS.
If a similar 1.5S spec is produced by P2 in SWB form, a price of around rm60k-rm70k can be expected eh? any thoughts?
January 29, 2008 @ 10:22 am
Consider Toyota’s ‘Just In Time’ approach in product release. Consider the Badge. this vehicle is specially designed for South Asian market only. If they place this car in the below RM75K category (although they should, for a cheapo midsize pseudo SUV), then at what price will they sell the actual small 4by4 SUV new Kembara?
20 million potential buyers, how many do you think realize that this is actually not worth RM85K in Indon? People will buy coz it’s a Toyota. Maybe not you and me.
January 29, 2008 @ 10:22 am
It looks great but to pay some RM90k for the automatic is asking too much.
January 29, 2008 @ 10:23 am
Paul,
I hope you can shed some light into this. A currency conversion of the 1.5S A/T from RP183,800,000 to RM is about RM68k. Why is UMW selling it at RM95k?
January 29, 2008 @ 10:32 am
back seat cup holder remind me to PROTON PERSONA type..
BTW.. the interior is the ugliest design tht i ever seen made by toyota…
its look like a van dash design.. AND LOOK CHEAP ALSO…SUCKS
wat a $#@^(*&^……..
IF U WANT RUSH TO GET A CAR… GET THIS CRAP RUSH
January 29, 2008 @ 10:33 am
The funny thing about people who comment here is to speak before thinking.
1. Buying a Suzuki is fine but how many vitara you see on the road? Have you owned a suzuki, do you know how freaking expansive to buy spare parts from Japan. I did!
2. Have you owned a Avanza, do you know how easy and cheap to maintain and get spare parts? I did.
3. Toyota are known as master of manufacturer, a proven fomula that people wants their everyday car, realibility, low-cost maintainence, low mileage, fuss free and easy to drive. Some nuts talk about 3.0 Subaru tribeca? Do you know how much is the road-tax for 3.0l vehicle!!!?
4. At 88k, what can you get? For a new car. Lavina is a car designed specifically to sit between Avanza and Innova. Its here after 3 years Toyota have introduced such car segment. Nissan are not risk takers, they let others to create the market and come in to rip the rewards.
5. Can someone tell these 40 over nutters/commentor that CR-V and Vitara is on a Mid-sized SUV market segment, similar to RAV-4. So in that sense, Rush dont have a direct competitor, so why bother to compare until some other car maker says: Hey! Thats a cool idea, entry level/7-seater/2WD/family oriented/SUV. Lets do that TOO!
6. If you really call youself a car enthusiat, can you try to understand then appriciate every car (including the tata nano) for its purposed to be created before making senseless and shallow comments?
7. Cause Toyota have millions of designers, engineers, market reseachers with their million dollar paycheque to do their homework before a car call RUSH to roll out at the podium yesterday.
8. For those who still talk about national car and pride, bare in mind how many malaysian jobs are being created. Its the age of globalization in case you havent heard of it. Wake-up! The strenght of a country economy is judged by how well you have adapted in this new globalized economy, not how many protons you have produce you numbnuts!
No wonder some says we have 1st world infra-structure but 3rd world mentality. 51 years and we are still struggling because people who think we live in a paradise, and whatever it is, govt will fix it or pay for it. Do you understand that even PM cant stop the world from changing? So stop expecting to pay 88k for a car that dont share parts in the current market! Go buy a book a find out how Toyota become the world car maker in a record time and perhaps you can become the world number 1 pisang goreng seller.
January 29, 2008 @ 10:35 am
Not a fan of such creature. Toyota is starting to make cheapo cars at crazy high prices… Looking at the quality of the rear-most seats… sigh.. the steering wheel and the gearknob… very disappointing.
And the engine, lagi dasyat, 1.5L for such a big car… 7-seater and NO ABS? This is unimaginable for today’s market demand!
January 29, 2008 @ 10:38 am
THE CREAM COLORS LOOK IDIOT..
THIS IS THE SECOND CRAP FROM TOYOTA AFTER VIOSDUGONG
January 29, 2008 @ 10:47 am
Avanza, because UMW reckon people will accept the price range, here. Dude, it’s a matter of supply and demand. If M’sians agree to buy an SUV Toyota at this price, then WHY THE HELL NOT?
January 29, 2008 @ 10:49 am
Havent seen the actual car just yet. But like the extearior but the interior sooooo…..dull & cheap. Eeeeyeeeeew. Turn off.
Though of diff category car, GL is still a better car both interior & exterior.
January 29, 2008 @ 11:03 am
Maybe, just maybe, it costs RM20k a pop to deliver the cars here… muahaha.
Johanbey, maybe all that crap you wrote there is right. Maybe you studied International Business and E-Commerce and Global Finance. Maybe you didn’t study Mass Relations coz u called all of us nutters. But hey, we’re just exercising our right to an opinion. OUR 2 cents, bro. You can contradict too, just dont generalize us as nutters.
January 29, 2008 @ 11:10 am
If P2 sells a shortened version of this, its gonna be a real favourite with the Expat ’s Wives club. For some reason unknown to us locals.
At least this one has a decent nose job compared with Yaris/Vios/Camry design. It looks decent; design wise. Not something you expect from Toyota the leading auto maker. But something you’d expect from Toyota the most profitable auto maker.
If it is an SUV, then stop asking about ride comfort. Its good for scaring the bejezus out of people when you’re squeezing through morning traffic coz its huge. Its a traffic-buster or car-dozer or bike-swiper.
The interior does really shout PLASTIC in a way nobody else has ever tried (well except for KIA), declaring to everyone that it does not need to disguise what it is made off. Its bloody honest.
Very clearly its also made for a market that people still listen to AM radios and Cassettes.
January 29, 2008 @ 11:28 am
looks like a budget RAV4
January 29, 2008 @ 11:35 am
johanbey said,
2. Have you owned a Avanza, do you know how easy and cheap to maintain and get spare parts? I did.
3. Toyota are known as master of manufacturer, a proven fomula that people wants their everyday car, realibility, low-cost maintainence, low mileage, fuss free and easy to drive. Some nuts talk about 3.0 Subaru tribeca? Do you know how much is the road-tax for 3.0l vehicle!!!?
______
i agree with some of your points…..BUT let me point out what is my/our ( 40 odd commentors)concern:
The main problem is the quality of toyota interior recently really sucks. It is like putting a toyota badge on a Chery QQ and selling for RM70k.( a bit exaggerating but Toyota and especially UMW Toyota is heading towards that direction) Yeah sure the maintenance is cheap…coz most of the parts are of cheapo 3rd world quality. And u already paid the 5 yrs maintenance cost UPFRONT.
UMW really suck big time for using low grade parts…..have u ever been on the road recently n seen so many toyota with poor quality one year old “yellow” number plate and “aquarium” vios brake lights? Even the paint is of low grade and fade/ loses shine after only a yr.
Anyway a superb strategy by toyota for selling a nissan vannette that looks like an SUV without 4wd function at 30k more expensive for 3rd world soccer moms.
No one is asking for a 3- litre engine. Ppl were just saying even 3-litre engine still considered underpowered for SUV. Of course 3-litre doesn’t make sense in M’sia. A good choice would have been a 1.6 litre and 1.8 Litre or 2.0 litre option for this Rush.
This famous quote is dedicated to UMW toyota: ” You can fool some people all the time, and you can fool all the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
January 29, 2008 @ 11:35 am
i’m only an about 3 months old suzuki owner.. so i’ll talk about my frens experience. he owned a swift…first batch when swift first released in malaysia. until now..all he needs to do is only service the car. no problems at all. he drives quite rough and hardly take care of the car… but still no need to change spare parts and the car still feel like new even after more than 2 years… even if need to change spare parts, we have oem from taiwan… it’s swift la.. dunno about grand vitara…
oh…btw, my fren driving a satria gti tot that local car cheaper to maintain… he is crying liao… cos it’s expensive also… the local car cheaper to maintain is just a gimmick…
January 29, 2008 @ 11:43 am
Johanbey,
One more thing…..just because generally ppl do not agree with you does not give u the right to call them all nutters.
January 29, 2008 @ 11:47 am
Nice exterior, cheap interior, crappy 1.5l engine for the price. Definitely go for Grand Vitara just because of the price and engine size and go up several level. Being the overpriced Grand Livina is nothing as Rush is now the champion for overpriced ‘affordable’ car. But if selling at RM68k-78k still acceptable. Thet being said, a lot of Malaysian will still put their money into this overpriced creature because it’s a Toyota. Even though it’s a third world Toyota.
January 29, 2008 @ 12:06 pm
Johanbey,
i can’t fully support your comment but i think part of it is truth.
Malaysian reallly need to wake up. Indonesian, Thailand even Vietnam are doing very well in car manufacturing industries. if we still think that we are in haeven then we are 1 step closer to hell.
anyway, for this rush, my opinion will be OVERPRICE!!!
January 29, 2008 @ 12:11 pm
Johanbey,
Nutters here give comment or opinion bcoz we’re no longer fools..Those days yes.. Even proton now learn their lesson..to sustain the in the market listen to what people say coz we are the one holding the purchasing power. Toyota have been in the comfort zone for so long in this regional market. In their homeland, they will never ever introduce such scrappy cars..but outside Japan especially in this region, just look around what kind of car they’re offering?
I’ve lived in Japan for several years and there’s no doubt about Toyota’s superior in the automotive industy overthere. Even my family is a Toyota lover and my dad never change to other model since he bought his Corona in 1982. However, back here in msia.. i’m very dissapointed in their model line-up nowadays…cheap and low quality..meant for volume & maximum profitability. If this is their direction they’re moving forward.. we have to teach them something. We are they buyer & we are their future.
January 29, 2008 @ 12:11 pm
Poxxue2 said,
January 29, 2008 @ 7:08 am
Where have u been la?…avanza 1.3 had been selling for ages in Msia..and its a 7 seater la dey….
even Kancil 850 some people crammed 6-7 people…hehe..no prob dude….
Been living overseas for quite a while now.
6 - 7 people in a Kancil? All size 6 sub-50kg go-go dancers?
Eeeekkk …
on a more serious note, I suppose if potential Rush buyers use it for commuting to work, going to the shopping mall on weekends, occasional trips to the airport and to get to eating places, it should be fine. Even a Yaris has got a 1.5 litre engine.
I just don’t see your average Malaysian family filling it up with camping gear (tents, table, chairs, bicycles, cooking equipment, water and maybe a kayak on top) and then driving 400km in it for a weekend camping trip. Or doing anything sporty with it.
January 29, 2008 @ 12:22 pm
is this toyota…what a crap…exterior is condo interior is setinggan
common you guys for a car that price almost 100k u get the cheapest interior ever…your money only goes to the brand man…even if no tax if applied the car is still expensive for that kind of interior quality…wut so special about this car…nothin to shout about .even the exterior front look if you see it closely it almost same like savvy and latio (toyota cut cost huh) …its just only toyota..people will buy the brand..not the car…wutever from toyota is consider good…the ugliest will be the fabric and the din unit man…wut a crap…people open your eyes…its so easy to buy malaysian heart with branding not the product… rush is a crap crap crap
January 29, 2008 @ 12:27 pm
This toyota lacks QC in the interior! What happen to the Japanese of perfection? Died because of to much MTV…..
January 29, 2008 @ 12:29 pm
Toyota launches another MPV into the market, competing with it’s own Avanza. It’s not acceptable that while we are making it mandatory to wear seatbelts in the rear, we are not requiring car manufacturers to included safety features like ABS and EBD on their cars.
The HU is from 10 years ago? Who uses cassettes anymore? Anyway, it’s good that they included a 2-DIN player - I guess most ICE enthusiasts will quickly swap for an aftermarket DVD player or so….
January 29, 2008 @ 12:37 pm
johanbey said,
January 29, 2008 @ 10:33 am
6. If you really call youself a car enthusiat, can you try to understand then appriciate every car (including the tata nano) for its purposed to be created before making senseless and shallow comments?
–we appreciate every car but consider all aspect of the car not only the brand…if a car is overprice but crap interior like this rush, we have the rite to comment dont we…nutters like us dont buy a car because its toyota…we buy car base on what we get for what we pay…if u start talking about third world mentality you should judge yourself first for being low class mentality in accepting others comment…because for me if the car is sucks even if it was a ferrari or bugati or wutever its still sucks…
January 29, 2008 @ 12:44 pm
i look at the interior pics over and over again..still don’t understand how they come up with the design. the interior is like a basic van’s interior.
January 29, 2008 @ 12:47 pm
Shall we break it to the media about the RM20K price difference between Indon and M’sia? Or they’ve figured it out oredi.. Hey, we can tell Yamin Vong!
January 29, 2008 @ 1:14 pm
Though T Rush BUT actually this is a daihatsu unit, terios NOT Be-Go or T Rush as their interior, dashboard, gear lever are all different. Just Malaysia (and Indonesians alike) prefer BADGE over everything they just “comply” with our (mindset) standard. Cheapo car with spartan interior and appealing cost of ownership at luxury price.
Why not try to teach so-called Toyota?
January 29, 2008 @ 1:15 pm
Though T Rush BUT actually this is a daihatsu unit, terios NOT Be-Go or T Rush as their interior, dashboard, gear lever are all different. Just Malaysia (and Indonesians alike) prefer BADGE over everything they just “comply” with our (mindset) standard. Cheapo car with spartan interior and appealing cost of ownership at luxury price.
Why not try to teach so-called Toyota? Power in ya hand, dude.
January 29, 2008 @ 1:16 pm
Man, that Avanza platform is showing. The car’s not high enough to be a rugged SUV, and the wheelbase is so long, it reminds me of the Avanza.
It’s like one of those Tamiya remote control cars where the body is like an interchangeable (plastic) cover.
Just restyle the car (body) differently and selling it with an SUV-classification. Very smart of Toyota. And I must say the car - at a glance - looks appealing.
A little pimping up will make this ride look teh biznes.
But the 1.5liters sounds underpowered.
January 29, 2008 @ 1:17 pm
he even called us goreng pisang seller numbnuts! now is that a nice way to communicate with friends?
January 29, 2008 @ 1:27 pm
so paul, the toyota rush iwe are getting is not based on the extended platform of the short wheel base rush from japan? and how ours differ from the japanese one?
January 29, 2008 @ 1:45 pm
looks like a scaled up version of kembara..
January 29, 2008 @ 1:49 pm
hmm… how bout the upcoming kembara??? is this oso the end of avanza?
January 29, 2008 @ 2:32 pm
the interior is a total turn off. not sure how it will looks like in real life. and i do also think that 1.5L is a bit underpowered for it. 1.8L should be better, and with ABS + EBD as standards.
——————
4. At 88k, what can you get? For a new car. Lavina is a car designed specifically to sit between Avanza and Innova. Its here after 3 years Toyota have introduced such car segment. Nissan are not risk takers, they let others to create the market and come in to rip the rewards.
–
its Livina, not lavina. competition is good for us. dont u think so? more option for us to choose from. and Livina was introduced elsewhere in ASIA almost a year ago. its a bit late but still it gives competition to Toyota… it sounds like everything comes out from ‘T’ is a good stuff to you…. do you work for toyota?
January 29, 2008 @ 2:33 pm
singapore’s toyota rush japan spec dashboard photo… http://paultan.org/forum/index.php/topic,721.msg15838/topicseen.html#msg15838
January 29, 2008 @ 2:42 pm
In Japan, Rush interior look better:
http://toyota.jp/rush/interior/index.html
http://toyota.jp/rush/interior/index.html
Or even D Be-Go share common dashboard unlike inferior ASEANized Terios/Rush assembled by Astra group.
http://www.daihatsu.co.jp/showroom/lineup/be-go/index.htm
UMW Toyota sucking our hard earned money with this offering’s prices.
January 29, 2008 @ 2:55 pm
Its cheap…consider it looks like an SUV, 7 seater, good pricing. WELL DONE. Ill take one Hilux please….What!?….its price about the same, its tough, more power, bigger space and size and it says “get out of my way i’m big”. Why Rush, its poitnless
January 29, 2008 @ 2:55 pm
haha, already told cha!! not Perodua, its Toyota……
January 29, 2008 @ 2:56 pm
8. For those who still talk about national car and pride, bare in mind how many malaysian jobs are being created. Its the age of globalization in case you havent heard of it. Wake-up! The strenght of a country economy is judged by how well you have adapted in this new globalized economy, not how many protons you have produce you numbnuts!
–
well.. lots of numbnuts in this forum are still not wake up you say? they already wake up long time ago and thats why they dont just accept all the T badge produts blindfolded!
and about “how many proton you produce” what kind of statement is it? with many employment created, does proton still not adapted yet to this globalized economy?stop dragging others to make your so-wake-up statement looks stronger!
January 29, 2008 @ 2:58 pm
I have to test drive to see how worst it handles…maybe worst than vios
January 29, 2008 @ 3:22 pm
The exterior : Very good. The interior : Total turn off. If you compare with JDM Rush, this is langit and bumi. The aircond - cable type sama dengan saga la brudder! I hope we condemn here kawkaw until they warrant improvement spec. Frankly, the LWB is not that awkward, in fact I like it better. I don’t want fancy toys, just black colour interior like JDM would be enough.
http://toyota.jp/rush/exterior/garally/index.html
http://toyota.jp/rush/interior/index.html
It is understood to reduce the cost, few toys will be remove but at least understand Malaysia’s market esp on the colour. You can put lower grade material (not the water resistant) on the seat but that colour? Even if the colour gives you the pseudo-space feeling, but it will scream “cheap” quite loud. Mktg, if you’re reading this you already lost 1 customer. Please TMAP/TTCAP do something.
And for those who thing everything comes out from Toyota is god’s gift to human, think again. This is nowhere near LS, GS and please, we just need the right colour (Hey, I don’t even comment on the price. I think it’s justified due to CBU status).
January 29, 2008 @ 3:28 pm
I wonder…..what’s Rush all abt?
It seems to b more xpnsv than Avanza n Vios, n not that well equipped save for the 1.5S model. The interior is especially disappointing, considering this comes from world’s no1 (or no2. Kejap naik atas GM, kejap turun balik…) car manufacturer.
To look rugged wit 4WD look? Geez……I wonder what’s wit the craze for soft off-road which probably can’t do much off-tarmac…..it’s like buying a pewter knife but using it to show off rather than cutting anything. Except that…..this pewter knife is very, very expensive…..n it’s not like there’s no cheap n more durable stainless steel knife to do some serious cutting tasks.
People, spend ur money wisely: if u need a budget MPV, u can get Avanza/Innova/Grand Livina/wait for Proton’s 2009 MPV, use the money saved to buy this junk for petrol or something else that is more necessary to live. U have to be extremely rich….n a bit dimwit to buy this ‘pewter knife’. Even if u want to buy the brand, it’s not like Toyota doesn’t hv any cheap model which is practical n made more money sense.
January 29, 2008 @ 3:47 pm
Exterior looks good but don’t really like the beige concept and design of the interior.
January 29, 2008 @ 5:34 pm
i think this a car is for a show, but non of the character fullfil the need either way,
rugged look but incapable, 7 seater but less comfy for its body roll i guess,
well,,some people might want put the money on it, not me,
who are really into 7 seater, should get a genuine 7 seater,
or probally take your time, proton MPV should be in the list, wait and be patient ..
January 29, 2008 @ 5:37 pm
with such price and specs toyota rush may compete with livina
some may disagree but think again, its a 2WD
fuel consumption maybe high for this car
totyota should launch a 2.0 version 4WD
January 29, 2008 @ 5:40 pm
Hehe.. This phenomenon happen when people “memuja” a brand to much
January 29, 2008 @ 6:18 pm
Cost RM23k more than the Avanza 1.5. What do you get? Basically the same things. Hell, even the seats are from the Avanza! You don’t get 4WD. No thanks! BTW, I drive an Avanza and I really don’t see any reason to get this.
January 29, 2008 @ 6:25 pm
overpriced la boss….
quite disapointed as i’ve been waiting to get sothing like that…..i think now i’ll just wait a little longer la… will stick to my old car for now.
from a consumer point of veiw, in malaysia, i’m willing to pay no more than RM100k for a T-Rush IF it has 1.8L engine, ABS, EBD and a better interior.
i think RM 65-75k would be reasonable for this T-Rush.
hope that P2 will give us a surprise offer la…
January 29, 2008 @ 6:41 pm
This is really Toyota acid test whether we can accept their T brand if the spec much lower than competitions. If YES that mean they need not to lower Kembara Replacemnet Model’s price.
If NOT they’ll lower down the Kembara price.
January 29, 2008 @ 7:03 pm
that interior looks absolutely appalling… its a total turnoff.
that kinda design and quality just isn’t acceptable when u’re paying close to RM100k for a stretched cute-ute.
January 29, 2008 @ 7:22 pm
To sum up what most people have comment above, Rush in an over-priced piece of crap.
1) Body = Basically a rebodied Avanza to look more sporty. Looks is acceptable though but not worth the price.
2) Safety = Active Safety items like the ABS & EBD is not available for the G spec. Obviously G spec mean nothing anymore to Toyota. Safety is compromise for people paying over RM80K for a vehicle. What a joke. Toyota, you are making me loose respect towards you.
3) SUV = Huh. But it’s on 2WD. Ofcourse I won’t expect much from a 1.5L engine but not having 4WD as an option is unacceptable.
4) Price = This the most ridiculous part, you pay extra RM18k for a rebodied Avanza minus safety items like Airbags, ABS & EBD.
People, please look past the appearance alone. Save the money and buy an Avanza 1.5G instead. The RM18k could be put to better use. ABS & EBD is very important as it would allow the driver an opportunity to steer the vehicle to safety instead of just going straight during emergency braking.
Some might arque that the 1.5S model have the ABS & EBD plus airbag. True but then you are paying over RM25k for a rebodied Avanza with projector headlamp. Not worth while.
The concept of the product may be nice but the overly greedy people managing the sales are under cutting the package that could be offered to make a fast buck knowing a lot of pitiful malaysian know nothing about vehicle safety and maths.
January 29, 2008 @ 9:10 pm
the interior looks very cheap. even the new saga’s interior looks more upmarket.
January 29, 2008 @ 9:20 pm
i wont rush for this one…
January 29, 2008 @ 9:36 pm
wait for new X trail although it is not in the same class. why not just pay bit higher and get better ones?
January 29, 2008 @ 9:59 pm
Like it or not:
-rush will still sell better than the nutters who compare it with vitara and lavina.
-ppl criticise new vios(like dugong)but it outsold even the latio.
-1.5l underpower?so many avanza owner won’t be wrong…
-Innova,hilux,and fortuner share same platform so what?All selling very well in their class at least.
-So many wish and so little stream around…
-Waiting list so long for camry…
Bravo to TOYOTA!!!
*only yaris not doing so well due to price positioning.
January 29, 2008 @ 10:18 pm
SUV punya avanza
January 29, 2008 @ 10:30 pm
Thanks Paul for fast information, but Malaysian really do not deserve a quality yet price competitive car as long as the ’so called’ national car still exist. In Indonesia, this car is RM28k cheaper (for 1.5 M/T model) by removing two seats!!!
January 29, 2008 @ 10:42 pm
Foremost, kudos to Paul Tan for his extensive kind coverage and congratulation to UMWT for its new launched elongated Rush.
It have shown up at last. Haha seems like most of you flabbergasted particularly for its interior. Yeah frankly speaking, it’s bloody disappointing. I can hear a lot of grouses here and that’s a good sign actually. You guys should react accordingly and give’em a good nice lesson so that they realize, Malaysians are changing and not that easy to be fooled anymore. As a consumer and buyer, you have the bloody right to be rather critical.
Given the fact that this car is being produced at Astra Daihatsu Motor (ADM), Indonesia, revealed to us about the state of the car’s quality. Not that commendable. My contacts in Toyota and Daihatsu Japan also stressed out that this ADM is suck. The standard is damn low and not like the higher class of those Toyota manufacturing plants in Thailand. They said even Perodua is much better. If you wanna whack this car then IMHO it deserves to. The price is not reasonable ! The actual price should be at slightly same range with Avanza.
Can this kind of car be sold in Japan ? I mean with that kind of price and quality ? Not a chance…consumer is the king and Toyota will be kicked hard on its arse…yeah really really hard.
January 29, 2008 @ 10:54 pm
UMWT does really well in reaching their hands deeply into the pockets of “brand conscious” Malaysian car buyers. Put the Toyota badge into anything, and people will buy. Sooner or later, they will become complacent enough and don’t bother about quality & affordability anymore.
Fellow Malaysians, do your research well before buying from UMWT. There are better alternatives out there with better pricing, quality, reliability and after sales service.
January 29, 2008 @ 10:54 pm
Was told by *ahem* somebody in P2 that they won’t get the new Kembara out coz there’s some volume problems with Viva. So T thinks its better that the new Kembara is sold as the original Rush. They think having the T instead of the P would sell more.
Makes marketing logic. But they misunderestimated that both brands carry different customer expectations. Each marque caters for a different target market. The P clients wouldn’t shout if it was the new Kembara as they don’t expect much, like anybody who buys a Viva.
So much for EBIT growth. I wonder who’s EBIT is concerned, Toyota or UMW?
January 29, 2008 @ 11:17 pm
1220KG wif only 1.5 litre? Fuel consumption must be quite bad and will be underpowered…
January 29, 2008 @ 11:26 pm
T-fan don’t mind, a lot of them OK though their Hilux only slightly powerful than Tata 4×4, enough is enough.
January 30, 2008 @ 12:11 am
nice exterior but dissapointing engine n interior..its just like a beautiful girl or a handsome man but with a bad heart n bad habits…or maybe the Avanza went for a nose job or boob job (plastic surgery) to become RUSH..we malaysian’s are not blinded by looks toyota!!..buck up..why dont u just CKD the Japanese Domestic Model (JDM) Rush or CKD the RAV4..at least more malaysian’s will have jobs..just like honda with their CRV..For 95k!! i think a 2nd hand or a recondition harrier seems like a better option..(or even a vitara,x-trail,sorento)
p/s: Paul i guess u should compare RUSH with other competitor…
January 30, 2008 @ 12:15 am
the daihatsu bego and JDM interior is so much better, if they apply it to the local RUSH i will rush to the showroom and get myself one!
CRAP INTERIOR FOR TASTELESS PEOPLE
no driving pleasure for sure…
January 30, 2008 @ 12:56 am
based on Japan official website, fuel consumption for auto spec is 14km/L and 15.2km/L. i think quite ok already. however, the japanense model only 5 seats.
January 30, 2008 @ 12:56 am
based on Japan official website, fuel consumption for auto spec is 14km/L and 15.2km/L for manual. i think quite ok already. however, the japanense model only 5 seats.
January 30, 2008 @ 2:30 am
UMW Toyota is just too F***ing greedy!
January 30, 2008 @ 2:33 am
8918 said,
January 29, 2008 @ 9:59 pm
Like it or not:
-rush will still sell better than the nutters who compare it with vitara and lavina.
-ppl criticise new vios(like dugong)but it outsold even the latio.
-1.5l underpower?so many avanza owner won’t be wrong…
-Innova,hilux,and fortuner share same platform so what?All selling very well in their class at least.
-So many wish and so little stream around…
-Waiting list so long for camry…
Bravo to TOYOTA!!!
*only yaris not doing so well due to price positioning.
_____
another blinded toyota hardcore fanboy that will praise any product from toyota no matter how lousy it is.
January 30, 2008 @ 2:34 am
8918 said,
January 29, 2008 @ 9:59 pm
Like it or not:
-rush will still sell better than the nutters who compare it with vitara and lavina.
—only nutters will buy this crap instead of vitara and livina ( so sad people buying the brand not the car)
-ppl criticise new vios(like dugong)but it outsold even the latio.
— latio is more worse then latio…that is the reason.. but if you can see clearly the new vios isn’t too popular compare to the old vios…somehow persona is easy to be seen at the road nowdays compare to the new vios even my auntie (own a old version vios) said the new vios is suck…better go for civic man
-1.5l underpower?so many avanza owner won’t be wrong…
—avanza is family car market..so people who buy it not push the car to the limit so they dont complain…but this rush is SUV (sports utility vehicle)segment so where is the sport feel if its cannot be what its suppose to be…with those weight surely its will be underpower
-Innova,hilux,and fortuner share same platform so what?All selling very well in their class at least.
—yup agree with you on this…but still not because it was a car…its about brand…think toyota car is design by god and quality proven by god (what a crap)
Bravo to TOYOTA!!!
hope malaysian not be easily fool by brand like this fool…peace
January 30, 2008 @ 3:54 am
I know this is an unfair comparison but for the price of the Toyota Rush 1.5S, one could buy a Toyota RAV4 Limited (top spec model) with leather seats, self dimming mirror, intergrated bluetooth, 6 in dash speaker etc etc. in the US. I really wonder how much does the Malaysian government reaps in with all the CBU and CKD taxes. Furthermore, the interior of the Rush is really awful. It reminds me of the ealier Gen 2 interiors, which was horrendous.
January 30, 2008 @ 7:37 am
can’t really blame Toyota/UMW la, i think we ourselves that make them think that they can put their products and any price they like and yet can reach their sales target. well well well, malaysian we have to wake up sometimes and show them that we won’t just simply buy thier ideas now… don’t bleme me if i say that i seriously hope for a bad sales record this time for T-Rush to wake them up a bit…. so people if you can hang on just hang on, save some money for a better models later….
January 30, 2008 @ 8:53 am
like most of the toyotas sold in malaysia.. the plastics look really cheap. but the hordes of toyota fans will still be buying it for sure. but everyone has the right to spend their hard-earned money any way they want too.
for me, I would get the livina. its a proper focused MPV, and if you want a real MPV why buy something thats trying to be an SUV, but isnt, and also trying to be an MPV at the same time?
January 30, 2008 @ 9:02 am
toyota always produce crappy interiors..just look at all their models..they lose flat out to honda in every aspects..low costs interior+price slightly lower than its competitor = toyota’s winning formulae..
-prefer H than T-
January 30, 2008 @ 9:05 am
wahlaueh…
still typically large steering wheel…. i like WAJA steering wheel just in nice size not too big or too small… TOYOTA when you can change the steering wheel size??…
January 30, 2008 @ 9:23 am
8918 said,
January 29, 2008 @ 9:59 pm
-1.5l underpower?so many avanza owner won’t be wrong…
________________
you never heard of the phrase” the blind leading the blind? “
January 30, 2008 @ 9:24 am
no matter how bad the bashes are, toyotas are known to last. Even terrorists loves em
Just like some of you 
:)
January 30, 2008 @ 9:55 am
I don’t think this is Toyota Japan, this is the work of UMWT. Shaming yourself like this will prompt harakiri in Japan. UMWT is shameless. They’re banking on brand name alone and it appears to be working. And folks, dont worry about those three guys, they just pushing your buttons just to make this string longer. Hehe.
January 30, 2008 @ 10:39 am
ok lah SUV…if u have money n u like it.. go n buy…
BTW wondering why people comparing grand livina with RUSH??
January 30, 2008 @ 11:17 am
Although I’m driving a T car, but this new T Rush is rather disappointing in terms of engine capacity, interior, price and safety issues. A very sad/sick product from T badge.
January 30, 2008 @ 1:22 pm
why some people is blaming UMWT la Astra daihatsu la for produce out this crap…if toyota not proving it do you think UMW have power to release this model…do you think toyota will allowed their subordinate to scratch their reputation without their approval…this is all toyota decision..not UMW..not astra..its all about their cut cost max profit method…thats all…they use us because they know we will buy because of the badge not the car…why people blaming our own countrymen or indonesian for a greedy jap faults…huh so lame…
January 30, 2008 @ 2:12 pm
ganz said,
January 30, 2008 @ 10:39 am
BTW wondering why people comparing grand livina with RUSH??
—————-
Because T try to TRANSFORM this thing to eat Bolehland MPV cake. lolz!!!
January 30, 2008 @ 4:24 pm
OK… so this how the Avanza looks like with an SUV shell over it. So… what’s the point, Toyota? Nice shell but the interior is so low rent it’s a real turn-off.
I’m really interested to see how many Malaysians will actually buy into this SUV “lifestyle” story.
January 30, 2008 @ 6:51 pm
wah 129 comments for a toyota topic?not bad….all the bashes is pointing to toyota now?wow a year ago this is impossible…man this blog is damn fun…is there any word such as toyota blind basher?i wanna be one̷