The ministry of international trade and industry (MITI) says it is looking at a reduction in vehicle excise duties as a possible means to bring car prices down. Such a move will mean less direct revenue for the government, but this will be offset by improved tax collection from an increased sales volume, according to deputy minister of international trade and industry Ong Kian Ming.
He said that on the whole, it would benefit consumers, industry players as well as the government, as The Star reports. “Of course, there is a cost-benefit involved here, in the sense that you have more tax reduction in the excise duty. The government may collect less per unit, but whatever revenue lost by the finance ministry can be regained by the increase in the sales volume because car prices would be lower,” he said.
“The original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) get to sell more cars, consumers get to benefit from lower car prices and the finance ministry gets to benefit as well, when it gets to collect more excise tax as a whole because of increased volumes. This is something we want to work towards for all car models,” he explained.
Ong said that industry players will be providing the government with their estimates on an expected increase in sales volume as a result of excise duty being reduced. He added that local parts suppliers and OEM vendors will also benefit from the move through an increase in completely-knocked-down (CKD) activities.
Industry observers and analysts offered different views on the proposed move. An industry observer said that it would help lower car prices and benefit local automakers more than those that imported vehicles, as this would help CKD programmes in the country.
An analyst had a different take on the matter, saying that an excise duty reduction will not have an impact on sales volumes or improve the government’s coffers, adding that even if it did, it might hardly be felt. “The prices of Perodua and Proton vehicles might not reduce that much from this, but it will be more favourable for Japanese brands,” he said.
What do you think of the plan to reduce automotive excise duties? Share your thoughts in the comments section, but do remember to keep it civil.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
Dylan Ch'ng
on 
johnnas
on 
YB Kunta Kinte
on 
arya
on 
John Bin Dedak
on 
YB Albert
on 
joe
on 
john
on 
rozz
on 
Daddykasi
on 
Anon
on 
shaw
on 
The Roti john Company Sdn Bhd
on 
mat
on 
Everest
on 
Yahya Awal
on 
U-Tun
on 
krs189
on 
4G63T DSM
on 
Ollie
on 
Separuh-Nilai
on 
Sugarhill
on 
Tanah Merah
on 
mustaqim
on 
Susukotak
on 
lilytan
on 
Antianalyst
on 
PH empty promises
on 
azhar
on 
Avenger
on 
Pizz
on 
joker
on 
Paul Wee
on 
Seelan
on 
johnwhat
on 
newme
on 
sohhai
on 
benzs
on 
thepolygon
on 
Nick
on 
anon
on 
Dong gor
on 
ILAVARASAN A/L NADARAJAN
on 
Not Toyota Fan
on 
pengayuhbasikal
on 
Pp
on 
john is otak batu
on 
Joey
on 
utun
on 
Honda_Fan
on 
Satu batu dua burung!
on 
Rennie A Ghani
on 
Carolyn Khaw
on 
Sammy Loo
on 
TOTO
on 
Syd
on 
zztop
on 
blankarung
on 
vVivi Zurianti
on 
Wanhamizan
on 
Ekbk
on 
Engineer
on 
Francis Lim
on 
Mike Khoh
on 
alldisc
on 
Jerry C
on 
Henry
on 
Andrekua
on 
Greasemonkey
on 
muhammad
on 
AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments express mixed feelings about MITI's plan to reduce excise duties to lower car prices, with some hopeful that prices will fall and others skeptical due to potential U-turns or minimal impact. Many highlight that lower duties could benefit imported CBU cars and make vehicles more affordable, but express concern that local manufacturers like Proton and Perodua may resist, and that savings might not be passed to consumers. Several comments emphasize that past promises to reduce car prices have been unfulfilled, criticizing government inaction, protective policies, and the influence of national car makers. There's also discussion about broader issues such as congestion, pollution, public transport, and economic competitiveness, with some urging for comprehensive reforms beyond just duty reductions. Overall, there's cautious optimism tempered by skepticism about genuine change.