BYD Atto 2 vs Mazda CX-3
Verdict
For Malaysian buyers, the BYD Atto 2 offers a compelling choice with its RM 100,000 price tag, significantly lower than the RM 107,920 CX-3. With an impressive 174 hp electric powertrain and a robust EV range of 345 km, it stands out as an affordable and efficient option in the B-segment SUV market, especially for those looking to embrace electric mobility.
Pick the Atto 2 if you prioritise electric efficiency and lower running costs.
Pick the CX-3 if you prefer a traditional petrol engine and a more established model.
Key differences
- Price: RM 100,000 (Atto 2) vs RM 107,920 (CX-3)
- Power: 174 hp (Atto 2) vs 114 hp (CX-3)
- Torque: N/A (Atto 2) vs 149 Nm (CX-3)
- 0–100 km/h: 7.9 s (Atto 2) vs N/A (CX-3)
- EV range: 345 km (Atto 2) vs N/A (CX-3)
- Boot space: 380 L (Atto 2) vs 350 L (CX-3)
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM 100,000✓ | RM 107,920 |
| Body type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | B-Segment | B-Segment |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Assembly | CBU | CBU |
| Powertrain | ||
| Fuel | Electric | Petrol |
| Engine | Electric | 1,496 cc |
| Power | 174 hp✓ | 114 hp |
| Torque | — | 149 Nm |
| Transmission | Single Ratio Automatic | Conventional Automatic |
| Driven wheels | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.9 s | — |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | — |
| Efficiency | ||
| Battery | 51.1 kWh | — |
| EV range | 345 km | — |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,275 mm |
| Width | 1,830 mm | 1,765 mm |
| Height | 1,675 mm | 1,535 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,620 mm | 2,570 mm |
| Boot space | 380 L✓ | 350 L |
| Fuel tank | — | 48 L |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 6✓ | 2 |
| Auto emergency braking | Yes | — |
| Ownership | ||
| Warranty | 6✓ | 5 |
| Road tax / year | RM 120 | RM 120 |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
Atto 2
- Lower price point at RM 100,000
- Superior electric range of 345 km
- More powerful with 174 hp
- Less torque compared to petrol rivals
- Less established brand presence
- Smaller boot space than some competitors
CX-3
- Familiar petrol engine performance
- More torque at 149 Nm
- Established brand with a loyal following
- Higher price at RM 107,920
- Lower power output at 114 hp
- Limited features compared to newer models
Atto 2 vs CX-3 FAQ
Is the Atto 2 or CX-3 better?
The Atto 2 is better for those seeking an electric vehicle with superior range and power, while the CX-3 is suited for buyers who prefer a traditional petrol SUV.
What is the price difference?
The Atto 2 is priced at RM 100,000, while the CX-3 costs RM 107,920, making the Atto 2 RM 7,920 cheaper.
What are the warranty periods for both models?
The Atto 2 comes with a 6-year warranty, while the CX-3 offers a 5-year warranty.