Perodua Axia vs Wuling Bingo
Verdict
The Perodua Axia is the simple money answer: at RM38,600 it undercuts the Wuling Bingo by RM29,200, seats five instead of four and matches it for power at 67 hp. The Bingo asks proper extra money, but gives you an electric drivetrain, a 31.9 kWh battery, 273 km of range, six airbags and a much larger 395-litre boot. It is also bigger in every exterior direction. For a first car, the Axia’s price still bites hardest; for an urban EV brief, the Bingo’s space and safety kit matter.
Pick the Perodua Axia if you want the cheaper five-seat hatchback with petrol running, a CVT and the same 67 hp output.
Pick the Wuling Bingo if you want an electric hatchback with 273 km of range, six airbags and a bigger boot.
Key differences
- Price: Perodua Axia RM38,600; Wuling Bingo RM67,800
- Fuel/drivetrain: Perodua Axia petrol 998 cc; Wuling Bingo electric single motor
- Seats: Perodua Axia 5; Wuling Bingo 4
- Boot space: Perodua Axia 265 litres; Wuling Bingo 395 litres
- Airbags: Perodua Axia 2; Wuling Bingo 6
- Size: Perodua Axia 3,760 mm long and 1,655 mm wide; Wuling Bingo 3,950 mm long and 1,708 mm wide
| Price & overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | RM 38,600✓ | RM 67,800 |
| Body type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | A-Segment | B-Segment |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Assembly | CKD | CKD |
| Powertrain | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Electric |
| Engine | 998 cc | Single motor |
| Power | 67 hp | 67 hp |
| Torque | 91 Nm | — |
| Transmission | CVT Automatic | Single Ratio Automatic |
| Driven wheels | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Efficiency | ||
| Fuel economy | 25.3 L/100km | — |
| Battery | — | 31.9 kWh |
| EV range | — | 273 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 3,760 mm | 3,950 mm |
| Width | 1,655 mm | 1,708 mm |
| Height | 1,505 mm | 1,580 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,525 mm | 2,560 mm |
| Boot space | 265 L | 395 L✓ |
| Fuel tank | 36 L | — |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 2 | 6✓ |
| Auto emergency braking | — | — |
| Ownership | ||
| Warranty | 5 | 5 |
| Road tax / year | RM 20 | RM 20 |
Specs shown for the selected variant of each car. ✓ marks the better figure where lower/higher is objectively better. Road tax: West Malaysia, private registration.
Axia
- Much lower purchase price
- Five seats
- 36-litre fuel tank and RM20 road tax
- Only two airbags
- Smaller 265-litre boot
- No electric range or battery option
Bingo
- 31.9 kWh battery with 273 km EV range
- Larger 395-litre boot
- Six airbags
- RM29,200 dearer than the Axia
- Only four seats
- No auto emergency braking listed
Axia vs Bingo FAQ
Is the Perodua Axia or Wuling Bingo better?
The Perodua Axia is better for budget-led buyers because it costs less, seats five and has the same 67 hp output. The Wuling Bingo is better if you want an EV with more boot space and six airbags.
What is the price difference?
The Perodua Axia costs RM38,600, while the Wuling Bingo costs RM67,800. That makes the Bingo RM29,200 more expensive.
Which one has more space?
The Wuling Bingo is larger, measuring 3,950 mm long with a 2,560 mm wheelbase and 395-litre boot. The Perodua Axia is 3,760 mm long with a 2,525 mm wheelbase and 265-litre boot, but it has five seats instead of four.