Saya check dgn @TengkuAdnanReal, dia TAK cakap RON95 akan hanya dijual kpd orang miskin. Jangan spin cerita tak betul.
— Khairy Jamaluddin (@Khairykj) January 24, 2014
Kenapa bodoh sangat tak faham yang di cakap kita cakap rationalisation fisical tentang subsidy untuk rakyat yang memerlukan bukan yang kaya
— Tengku Adnan (@TengkuAdnanReal) January 24, 2014
sad with people whom like to sensationalised things suka fitnah suka bawa cerita suka mengata mana sifat ketimuran kita mana agama kita SAD
— Tengku Adnan (@TengkuAdnanReal) January 24, 2014
Minister of Youth & Sports Khairy Jamaluddin tweeted earlier today that Federal Territories minister Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor was misquoted by dailies yesterday on the matter of RON95 fuel to be restricted for purchase only by the ‘poor’ from May/June this year.
Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan also published two tweets on the matter, clarifying that he was talking about fiscal rationalisation on subsidies to ensure they benefit citizens who really need them instead of wealthy citizens.
No details were mentioned on what that actually means. How will restricting fuel subsidies to citizens deemed to be ‘wealthy’ work? If we look back to 2008, there were proposals of quotas for subsidised fuels being discussed. Quotas could be enforced through MyKad verification at the pump using a system like ePetrol.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments express frustration and skepticism over the government's handling of fuel subsidies and economic policies. Many criticize the misquotation of Ku Nan related to RON95 fuel being for the poor and highlight that subsidies should benefit all Malaysians, not just the poor. There's widespread dissatisfaction with politicians’ communication skills and their tendency to deflect blame or politicize issues. Several comments address the unfair division between the rich and the poor, emphasizing that taxation and subsidies should be fair across income groups. Others express concern over corruption, misuse of public funds, and the lack of transparency in resource management. Overall, the sentiment is one of disillusionment with leadership, a call for fair policies, and frustration over social and economic inequalities.