Toll rates for 20 highways are not planned to be increased next year, but the government is expected to pay RM558.69 million in compensation to highway concessionaires as a result, Bernama reports.
The 20 aforementioned highways are:
- Ampang-Kuala Lumpur Elevated Highway (AKLEH)
- Western Kuala Lumpur Traffic Dispersal Scheme (SPRINT)
- New Pantai Expressway (NPE)
- Kajang Dispersal Link Expressway (SILK)
- Storm Water Management and Road Tunnel (SMART)
- South Klang Valley Expressway (SKVE)
- Sungai Besi Expressway (SBE)
- Senai-Desaru Expressway (SDE)
- Butterworth Outer Ring Road (BORR)
- Guthrie Corridor Expressway (GCE)
- Kajang-Seremban Highway (LEKAS)
- Duta-Ulu Kelang Expressway (DUKE)
- Maju Expressway (MEX)
- Damansara-Puchong Expressway (LDP)
- New North Klang Straits Bypass (NNKSB)
- East Coast Expressway (ECE1)
- Kuala Lumpur-Karak Expressway (KLK)
- Cheras-Kajang Highway (Grand Saga)
- KL-Kuala Selangor Expressway (LATAR)
- Shah Alam Highway (LKSA).
“An allocation of RM458 million has been approved to the ministry to pay the compensation. An additional allocation will be sought in mid-2015,” deputy Works minister Datuk Seri Rosnah Abdul Rashid Shirlin said, adding that 17 highways will get their compensation next year; the rest in 2016.
The compensation amount is based on a formula stipulated in the concession agreement, and the actual amount will only be determined after the Malaysian Highway Authority (LLM) completes its traffic verification process, she said.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments express frustration over the government’s decision to pay RM559 million in compensation to concessionaires due to postponed toll hikes, highlighting issues of transparency and fairness. Many believe these agreements favor cronies and incur losses for taxpayers, criticizing the lack of disclosure and the questionable fairness of guaranteed profits and risk distribution. There is strong skepticism about the integrity of the deals, with claims that they benefit private companies at public expense. Several commenters argue that the highway projects have been profitable and question why they require compensation after years of operation, while others criticize the government for corruption, mismanagement, and unfair business practices. Overall, sentiments are predominantly negative, condemning the arrangement as another form of misappropriation and corruption.