Everyone wants to have a say on Proton, it seems. Following Tun Mahathir’s resignation from the national car brand last week, MITI minister Datuk Seri Mustapa Mohamed issued a lengthy statement on the current state of Proton. Since then, KPDNKK minister Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainuddin, Proton Edar Dealers Association (PEDA) president Armin Baniaz Pahamin and Tun M himself have voiced their (mixed) opinions.
Now, it’s the turn of the minister of information and communications, Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Salleh Keruak. Titled “the Proton willing buyer, willing seller situation,” Salleh’s opinion piece was published in his personal blog, SSKeruak. In it, he wrote that “that buying a car is not about nationalism or patriotism.” It all boils down to one thing, apparently, which is value for money.
“You cannot create a demand by asking Malaysians to buy your product just because they are Malaysian and Proton is also Malaysian,” Salleh added. He then cited Volvo’s sale to Chinese company Geely and BMW’s acquisition of Mini as examples of competition and globalisation turning the world into a buyers’ market.
Do read the minister’s statement in full, and share your comments on the matter below.
The Proton willing buyer, willing seller situation
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has asked Malaysians to help Proton. Proton is not government owned but private owned. Mahathir, however, wants Malaysians to help Proton as a sort of national service or as a mark of patriotism.
Personally I have no argument with this. After all, I am as Malaysian as Mahathir is and anything that helps keep Malaysia’s flag flying high I would be most supportive of.
But then we need to understand that buying a car is not about nationalism or patriotism. It is about spending sometimes up to half your monthly salary (instalments, road tax, insurance, fuel, toll charges, parking fees, service, etc.), not including the depreciation, which can be as high as 20% the instant you register your car and drive it out of the showroom.
So when someone buys a car it all boils down to just one thing, value for money, and whether later you can recover as much as possible from your investment when you decide to sell or trade-in your car. And a car is the worst investment you can own because it depreciates the instant you buy it and you loss more money every day you hold on to it.
So ultimately the issue of market forces and the law of supply and demand dictates what you do. If there is a demand then you create the supply. But you cannot create a demand by asking Malaysians to buy your product just because they are Malaysian and Proton is also Malaysian.
Sweden did not ask the Swedes to buy Volvo to prevent the company from being sold to the Chinese. Britain did not ask the British to buy Mini to prevent the company from being sold to the Germans. And the current problem the British government is facing is that three Tata steel factories (which are losing RM6 million a day) may be closed in the UK, resulting in the loss of 40,000 jobs because people prefer buying cheaper steel from China.
This is all about willing buyer, willing seller. But when the buyer is not willing then there is nothing the seller can do. Unfortunately, competition and globalisation have turned the world into a buyers’ market. That, basically, is what Proton is suffering from and not due to lack of nationalism and patriotism on the part of Malaysians.
AD: Drive the Proton model of your dreams. Submit your details and Proton PJ will get in touch with you.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments mainly express frustration over high car prices driven by protectionism, taxes, and government support for Proton, which some see as inefficient and a drain on national resources. Many believe Proton's quality and management issues prevent it from being competitive, suggesting it should be sold or closed. Several comments highlight that buying local cars can be a patriotic act, but only if they offer good value, quality, and affordability. There is criticism of political motives, with some viewing statements as political posturing, especially post-Mahathir's era. Others emphasize that patriotism goes beyond car purchase, encompassing national development and innovation. Overall, the sentiment is largely negative towards Proton's ongoing support and the perceived economic consequences of its survival, advocating for better quality, fair competition, and less government interference.