Our Toyota C-HR review we posted last week has over 100 comments at the time of writing, with many arguing whether or not the crossover is worth the money. Meanwhile, two new premium SUVs – BMW X3 and Range Rover Velar – launched within a day of each other last week garnered a lot of interest over what they offer, as well as what they don’t.
So, in this week’s PT Talks, Hafriz and Matt discuss Toyota’s opinion-dividing model – is it too expensive, and a case of style over substance? Plus, the new X3 and Velar – both have ok specs, but what’s sorely missing in the Malaysian models?
Do let us know your thoughts on these topics, plus any other comments or feedback on our new segment and/or set. Don’t mind the toys and props, though – we’re just having a little bit of fun ;)
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments mainly focus on the Toyota C-HR's high price in Malaysia, calling it overpriced compared to global markets and local competitors like HR-V and CR-V. Many argue UMW has marked it up excessively, making it less attractive despite its stylish design and better handling. There are debates over whether safety features like AEB should be mandatory, with some suggesting the model is not worth the premium. Comparisons are drawn with other SUVs like the Honda HR-V, Subaru XV, and Proton models, emphasizing value for money. Critics also express frustration over pricing strategies for BMW X3 and Range Rover Velar, which they see as overpriced and lacking in certain features like diesel options or safety gadgets. Overall, the sentiment is that the C-HR's high cost diminishes its competitiveness in the Malaysian market.