Our Toyota C-HR review we posted last week has over 100 comments at the time of writing, with many arguing whether or not the crossover is worth the money. Meanwhile, two new premium SUVs – BMW X3 and Range Rover Velar – launched within a day of each other last week garnered a lot of interest over what they offer, as well as what they don’t.
So, in this week’s PT Talks, Hafriz and Matt discuss Toyota’s opinion-dividing model – is it too expensive, and a case of style over substance? Plus, the new X3 and Velar – both have ok specs, but what’s sorely missing in the Malaysian models?
Do let us know your thoughts on these topics, plus any other comments or feedback on our new segment and/or set. Don’t mind the toys and props, though – we’re just having a little bit of fun ;)
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
Shafiq
on 
lotusftw
on 
camtakpro
on 
Haha
on 
Wawa
on 
Tengku Halim
on 
Same L0rr
on 
j0hn
on 
sparta
on 
komarad
on 
Jps
on 
loler
on 
Amran
on 
Yawnz
on 
NoWorthAll
on 
Wastemoney
on 
youtakpro
on 
Banana
on 
tokmoh.
on 
bshrutd
on 
Volvo best
on 
Turmeric Man
on 
bosch
on 
Gigergarlic
on 
Ibuyifcheap
on 
emos
on 
parap
on 
Kasimalu
on 
earn urself, buy urself
on 
Belajardulu
on 
TUV
on 
old dog
on 
Kaj
on 
Shah
on 
superdriver
on 
12yrsold john
on 
Hex
on 
Colins
on 
Petoron Sagu
on 
contilover
on 
Aazzx
on 
Makjab
on 
Bionik
on 
Chairperson
on 
Ghornon
on 
ChanKW
on 
fugley
on 
TanJ
on 
Rudd
on 
yongwun
on 
ALVIN
on 
Shooh
on 
Jim
on 
AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments mainly focus on the high price of the Toyota C-HR, with many considering it overpriced compared to its competitors like the HR-V, CR-V, and others in its segment. Several commenters criticize the valuation, emphasizing that the C-HR is more style than substance, and some compare it unfavorably to other brands such as Proton, Volvo, and BMW. Positive remarks about its design and driving experience are offset by concerns over cost, lack of features, and comparisons to global pricing.