After earning a five-star Euro NCAP safety rating, the 2015 Volvo XC90 has added yet another feather in its cap after the SUV was awarded a Top Safety Pick+ status from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) – the highest possible rating to be given out by the US-based organisation.
The Volvo XC90 chalked up a ‘Good’ rating in five separate crash categories that includes the front small overlap, front moderate overlap, side impact, roof strength and head restraint and seats tests. As a result, the vehicle scored a maximum six points to earn a ‘Superior’ score in terms of front-crash prevention capabilities.
Key to success in the aforementioned category was courtesy of the car’s updated Volvo City Safety system. Said safety net allowed the Volvo XC90 to autonomously brake from speeds between 19 and 40 km/h. “The independent testing result from IIHS once again highlights the exceptional nature of the work we do at Volvo Cars in taking car safety to a new level,” commented Volvo Safety Centre director, Cecilia Larsson.
The small overlap test is, arguably, one of the most punishing forms of obstacles a car has to go through under the supervision of the IIHS. In said test, the Volvo XC90 was driven into an obstacle at a speed of 64 km/h. The car, as mentioned, passed with flying colours. A report by the IIHS stated that “measures taken from the dummy showed a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.”
Closer to home, it was revealed in April that order books for the Volvo XC90 have been opened since then. While said report claimed that a local launch was due for the third quarter of 2015, Volvo Malaysia has since remained relatively silent on the notion of the car’s arrival. It was also reported earlier on that the Volvo XC90 will go on sale in Malaysia in a sole T8 “Twin Engine” plug-in hybrid trim.
GALLERY: Volvo XC90 T8 Twin Engine
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.
This is not news. It’s only news when Volvo doesn’t get top marks for any safety test.
This is how amazing the China company can be.
Malaysians are stupid. Pay so much for a Volvo. Our Proton is at par with BMW and Volvo. This is no sarcasm. I love Proton and I myself truly believe Proton quality is better than any volvo crap
So, why waste money and buy a Volvo? Support your own car!
This is about XC-90, dude. Yes, Iriz for example is valued for money for the safety features installed, standard across the range some more. But there is no way it can beat any Volvo, especially XC-90. It gets the recognition from the strictest safety test. I do not mean to condemn proton but the money u pay for a Volvo also goes to its build quality as well.
But still toyota rules the world. High RV summore
Since you’re too concerned about rv you probably might even die from lack of safety even before you can sell your high rv car man
Better buy Proton, ‘Volvo of Asia’, better than original
Meh. Volvo FH truck have got autonomous braking 3 years ago. This is just Geely inheriting the tech from real Volvo Sweden.
Volvo have applied auto brake feature for a long time, at least even in XC60 launched 7, 8 years ago have it too. They just keep refining and improving it, nothing wrong with them co-operating with Volvo Truck.
But the system is at a pinnacle in an FH. The real Volvo Sweden (ie Trucks), have mastered this tech. Oh BTW Volvo Trucks dun align themselves to Cars, they treat them as a separate company.
No surprise, their car safety tech is like more than 20 years ahead of anybody !
I notice inside the car during small overlap crash, the curtain airbag blow thicker on the edge near the steering wheel, so you head won’t smash side way on the windshield fender. None of the other car brands did this !
rm248k and rm65k…for 2013 and 2006 XC90 used car advertisements.
From almost rm300K for brand new XC90,it drops to rm 65K in 9 years……..a whopping depreciation of rm230K.
Volvo resale values is no better than Proton…and the spare parts after 9 years…..more expensive than Merc Benz parts…and very very expensive.
Anyway,like Protong…there are always loyal Volvo supporters.
I’d still go for this if i need to ferry my family. Yes parts are rare and ex but still acceptable. My dad had a 240GL that served us well from 1988 to 2006.
Full body repaint once, engine overhaul once and one silly accident at the Bank Negara roundabout, caused by a lady who came speeding down despite traffic lights already turned red for her. Expectedly her Saga’s engine and radiators detached from the bay with the front half of her car fully damaged. My dad’s Volvo? Just to knock the front fender and bumper, spray a bit and a new headlamp.
Engine detached from bay in collision is part of the safety feature in modern cars. In more severe collisison this might save your life because engine wont intrude your cabin and crashes you.
Plus crumple zone makes the car absorb high impact. Harder body doesnt mean it’s safer without any crumple zone. Your car might be lesser damaged but your internal organs. That’s a big no no
Yes, in a modern car true. But that was a Proton Saga Aeroback Megavalve. The crash was so bad that the engine dropped from the chassis. It was a total loss although the rest of the car was fine. It was beyond repair.
Volvo is the Nokia 3310 of cars.
Related: http://imgur.com/FMlwABe
Volvo is king of depreciation. Avoid at all cost.
Volvo RV only like Nokia. Proton better
Pls use % instead of absolute numbers to calculate depreciation.
Also, some ppl is happy to save some money and die when their car hits a dog, while some ppl rather spend abit of money to stay alive. Its a matter of choice.
MeeToo,just use the bladdy calculator.You are what Tun describe LAZY…every thing spoon feed.Anyway,for lazy people…it is 80 percent and above cos the original price is way way above rm 30ok.
Good luck to you,if you prefer Volvo which is a VERY SAFE CAR.
Buy car, expecting ROI. U Maslan?
RV, RV, Albert is another Toyota SA? Desperate cannot sell car until have to bash Volvo? Apa salahan Volvo?!! Apa salahan Volvo?!! Apa salahan Volvo?!!
http://paultan.org/2009/12/10/new-mercedes-benz-ml-350-amg-sports-edition/
ML 350 RM 548,888 brand new, now:
http://oto.my/car-for-sale/148162/used-2007-mercedes-benz-m-class-ml350-kuala-lumpur/
2007 RM 116,800, lose RM 432k in 8 years.
BMW, Mercedes, Peugeot, VW RV lagi sampah, nobody cares.
Volvo RV sampah, all Toyota SA loses their mind! Anak murid Maslan betul.
I bet you will cry to get 10k from sam loo to trade it in, worse than kimchi owners
http://paultan.org/2007/05/30/e70-bmw-x5-30si-30d-48i-launched-in-malaysia/
2007 BMW X5 3.0i was launched for RM 548k
2007 BMW X5 3.0d was launched for RM 558k
2007 BMW X5 4.8i was launched for RM 888k
http://oto.my/car-for-sale/161544/used-2008-bmw-x5-4.8is-sport-kuala-lumpur/
2008 4.8i now RM 126,288, lose RM 761k after 7 years.
http://oto.my/car-for-sale/156938/used-2008-bmw-x5-xdrive35i-kuala-lumpur/
2008 3.0i now RM 138,399, lose RM409k after 7 years.
How? What excuse u wanna tell me?
BMW owners all never care about RV? Too rich, shouldn’t care about RV? Aik, double standard?
BMW more reliable than Volvo? Funny, I never remember Volvo earning Banyak Masuk Workshop Banyak Makan Wang reputation. I know many older Volvo still running around daily, not a testament to their durability?
Parts cheaper than Volvo? How much cheaper? As cheap as Proton Wira parts? RM7 oil filter? Alternator RM150? Starter motor RM100? Timing belt kit RM65? Spark plug set RM15? Air cond compressor RM300? ATF RM20/L? Wow, can recommend me your BMW part shop and mechanic?
But BMW more successful than Volvo, so maybe Volvo need to have worse RV so can become successful? Good, I’d love add more Chinese metal wives at greater value for my money.
Seeing how BMW can lose 409k in 7 years and be more successful, I guess first owner need to pay me RM109k to buy his car, then my Volvo will give me respectful image like a BMW owner. Yuo are of genious!
Bingo. You admit as a hypocrite person
When will ASEAN NCAP do the small overlap test? Ingin nak tengok Suprima S, Iriz, Myvi, City perform.
for ASEAN NCAP for Suprima S, Iriz, Myvi, City , they will put a Volvo XC90 in front and let them bang the volvo. haha
RV doesn’t matter. what matters the most is safety. UMW do you hear me?
RV won’t save your life
There are certain people who go for brand image, while some people go good specs like Volvo.