Perodua has posted a video on its Facebook page to explain the QV-E‘s much-maligned battery leasing programme. It reiterates much of the points you’ve heard before – battery degrades over time, Perodua takes responsibility for the battery’s health and environmentally-friendly disposal, resale value is protected because the car’s value isn’t tied to the battery.
“When the EV battery isn’t your responsibility, you’re protected from the usual concerns of ownership”, says the caption, and one of the texts in the video says “most EVs come with battery worries. QV-E doesn’t.”
You will no doubt find a thousand ways to poke holes at this (for the uninitiated or to jog your memory, dive deep into the Perodua QV-E’s battery leasing scheme here – it is rather complex), but what has us scratching our heads most is the ‘guaranteed resale value’ part.
You see, as far as we’re aware, Perodua has yet to publicise how much it’ll buy back the car for after X years/X km (you can only sell it through Perodua Pre-Owned Vehicles). So while you don’t have to worry about finding buyers when you’re done with the QV-E, you don’t know what the resale value is going to be.
Looking to sell your car? Sell it with Carro.

Perodua QV-E
from RM 80,000
Perodua Traz
from RM 76,100
Perodua Axia
from RM 38,600
Perodua Alza
from RM 62,500
Perodua Myvi
from RM 46,500
Perodua Ativa
from RM 62,500
Perodua Bezza
from RM 34,580
Perodua Aruz
from RM 72,900
AI-generated Summary ✨
Commenters express disappointment with Perodua’s battery leasing model, criticizing the high overall vehicle costs, lack of confidence in long-term resale value, and marketing missteps. Many highlight that including the battery in the car's price or offering warranties would be more attractive. There’s skepticism about the economic viability and public acceptance, with some suggesting the car's limited sales reflect its poor market fit. Overall, sentiments are largely negative towards the approach and execution of the EV project.