Perodua has posted a video on its Facebook page to explain the QV-E‘s much-maligned battery leasing programme. It reiterates much of the points you’ve heard before – battery degrades over time, Perodua takes responsibility for the battery’s health and environmentally-friendly disposal, resale value is protected because the car’s value isn’t tied to the battery.
“When the EV battery isn’t your responsibility, you’re protected from the usual concerns of ownership”, says the caption, and one of the texts in the video says “most EVs come with battery worries. QV-E doesn’t.”
You will no doubt find a thousand ways to poke holes at this (for the uninitiated or to jog your memory, dive deep into the Perodua QV-E’s battery leasing scheme here – it is rather complex), but what has us scratching our heads most is the ‘guaranteed resale value’ part.
You see, as far as we’re aware, Perodua has yet to publicise how much it’ll buy back the car for after X years/X km (you can only sell it through Perodua Pre-Owned Vehicles). So while you don’t have to worry about finding buyers when you’re done with the QV-E, you don’t know what the resale value is going to be.








Perodua QV-E
from RM69,999
Perodua Traz
from RM76,100
Perodua Axia
from RM33,900
Perodua Alza
from RM62,500
Perodua Myvi
from RM46,500
Perodua Ativa
from RM62,500
Perodua Bezza
from RM34,580
Perodua Aruz
from RM72,900
AI-generated Summary ✨
Comments reveal strong dissatisfaction with Perodua’s battery leasing scheme, high car price, and poor marketing strategy. Many criticize the lack of transparency, resale concerns, and the perceived misjudgment of consumer preferences. Some appreciate local innovation and the government’s potential subsidies but believe the overall package is uncompetitive. There’s skepticism about the viability of the business model and frustration over the limited sales and perceived mismanagement. Overall, sentiments are negative, emphasizing market rejection and operational missteps.